Have some pride, mate, and stop the ad-hominem, learn how to debate, and respond to what I posted. Although if you weren't awake to see it unfold, or didn't pay any attention, I can appreciate that you probably don't have anything useful, informative, or interesting to contribute.
Dude. The Associated Press declined to call states as a win for Trump that were showing as estimated over 90% of votes counted, and with a strong Trump lead. They certainly didn't exercise the same caution when they called Arizona for Biden with an estimate of 80% of votes counted. I also saw reports that people tasked with monitoring the election had been denied access to observe the counting of ballots. At the time that votes stopped being counted, I was watching the progress of the count in five states. Two of those states had Trump leads of 8% and 10%. In two other states Trump was also winning, but with smaller leads of 2-3%. In the fifth state, Biden had a small lead. Can anyone really blame Trump for smelling a rat when he had a good lead in most of the undeclared states, and the estimates showed that the majority of votes had already been counted?
Of course you also have to consider the bigger picture. The Democrats effectively wasted the last four years. Instead of learning from mistakes, developing policies that appeal to voters, and selecting a credible candidate, they tried everything to remove Trump from office, and spectacularly failed. In a mad panic, it seems highly likely that they hatched a plan to steal the election using mail-in votes in states with sympathetic Democrat administrations.
This will probably now be resolved by lawyers in courts, and I'm sure those fighting Trump's corner will have much more detailed data than what I've posted above from memory. Biden's lawyers will have to somehow convince a court that overturning Trump's strong lead with mail-in votes, was entirely legitimate and not at all fraudulent. I expect that when the Trump:Biden vote ratio is revealed for in person votes and mail-in votes there might be a very large difference. The only other option is that there were truckloads of mail-in votes, which raises the question as to why some states had far more mail-in votes than others.