- Jul 4, 2020
- 3,815
- 2,458
- 34
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Methodist
- Marital Status
- Engaged
Still none. No one said that Mary didn't fit that criteria. The idea is that as God erases our Original Sin when we get Baptized, God removed Mary's before she was born but she still needed a Savior just like us. God is not bound by time and can apply Christ Salvation when He wants. That does not mean Mary was perfect, just that she was born without original sin. *
-------------------
*Note: I believe as the Orthodox and do not believe in Original Sin but Ancestral Sin, which means we are not guilty of Adam's sin only he is. Yes that means I don't believe in Mary being born without Original sin and yes I know it goes against the Catholic Church, but I want to make clear what Catholics believe away from the lies
Sorry but there is nothing about this in the Bible. It never says that God removes Mary's original sin.
Not quite. The Bible is actually quite silent on this matter. The Bible doesn't tell us if Jesus' siblings are His biological siblings (children of Mary and Joseph), or the previous children of Joseph, or even only close kin, such as cousins. The Greek word translated as "brothers" includes all these definitions.
And all Scripture really tells us is that throughout the duration of Mary's pregnancy with Jesus she and Joseph never had sex. Whether they did after she gave birth to the Lord is unknown.
At no point in the Bible does it say that Mary had sex with Joseph, no where does the Bible say that Jesus' siblings were the children of Mary--those are views which are rooted in mere opinion and conjecture. They may be correct opinions, or they may not be; but they are nevertheless only opinions and conjecture. Scripture is absolutely silent on this subject.
-CryptoLutheran
Fair enough point.
Sorry, I don't understand how "She was a virgin after being pregnant with Jesus only because no sexual relations were part of it" contradicts the implantation of an embryo. If it wasn't the natural way and not implantation, what was it then?!
The Holy Spirit.
Three distinct Persons. They are never separate.
This might sound like mere semantics, but I think we can realize the significance of the difference between these two words if say we were to talk about whether two of your fingers are distinct, or whether they are separate. If they are separated then you might need to rush over to the hospital for surgery, but if they are distinct then you are only recognizing that the one is distinct from the other. I.e. your pointer finger is not your pinky and vice versa.
It is impossible to separate the Three Persons, because of the unity of God's Being. The Father is never separate from the Son, because He is the Father of the Son, even as the Son is never separate from the Father because He is the Son of the Father. The Father is not the Son, and the Son is not the Father; thus they are distinct; but they are never separate because they are one and the same God.
-CryptoLutheran
Ahh,.. now somebody has said something that is actually starting to make sense to me. So you're saying the Trinity is like the fingers and toes on your hands and feet?
Upvote
0