TLK Valentine
I've already read the books you want burned.
- Apr 15, 2012
- 64,493
- 30,319
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Agnostic
- Marital Status
- Single
Huh?
Don't think too hard about it -- Donald has spoken.
Upvote
0
Huh?
We are all welcome to our opinions. I don't agree with yours.
Hey look, another one of your bogus equivalencies between Obama and Trump. I guess since you couldn't back up your claims about Obama's supposedly-lurid private life, you've retreated back to something slightly less ridiculous.
But no, Obama didn't pat himself on the back nearly to the degree that Trump does. In fact, I can't think of anybody I've ever known - in public or in private - who does it as much as Trump. It's like there's something wrong with him.
Don't think too hard about it -- Donald has spoken.
If the first statement is any kind of criteria, many of us are too educated.
You are too educated to be president?
Too educated to support the current one, it would seem.
Unfortunately the presidency has no aptitude test or entrance exam; a person can get the job without being capable of doing it.
Sure he did, but constant pounding like that over the years can create confusion in the best of us. And this was a very quick reaction then it was realized. I simply don't blame him for these things at all.
In the end It's way off base to think he would downplay something he knew was a terrible thing like that. What do some of you people think, that he did that on purpose, knowing it was a real problem? Well of course you do.
If so, seems to me it isn't Trump with the real problem. Geez Loueeze.
As I understood it, Trump said the virus was fake news at first and as much fake news as he has encountered against him, it was perfectly reasonable for me to think him saying that was completely understandable.
IOW The dems/media cry wolf so often people stop taking them seriously, and then they blame people for not taking them seriously the few times they are.
Too educated to support the current one, it would seem.
Unfortunately the presidency has no aptitude test or entrance exam; a person can get the job without being capable of doing it.
Not sure what your first comment means
but the "test" is, do they have enough going for them to get elected.
Are they smart enough for the voters, and it's at least clear to me, Trump was.
I don't fault DT for not knowing how to do something. The problem is when he won't call in the people who do know, and take their advice. We have lost tons of talent and experience over the past 3.5 years. They haven't been replaced. Acting heads of agencies so he can control and not have to answer to folks. No one who values their reputation want to get within 100 miles of the WH and we all suffer for it.
His supporters may end up suffering most of all.
To maintain the analogy, you're forced to concede that the Dems/Media were right this time, and that Donald really did drop the ball.
I'm impressed.
Are claiming that the voters chose Donald for his intellect?
I believe Donald calls people like that "human scum" - Donald Trump describes Republican critics as 'human scum'What does it say about the followers if they admit the emperor has no clothes?
It is only strange if you've ignored the last three years. I mean, the administration and its defenders started off by lying about how many people came to the inauguration (both crowds and people with Russian money for Donald). The pattern's been there for years - it would be strange to expect something different at this point.It really is a strange line of reasoning if you stop and think about it.
Never mind that China simply stopped testing people so they could say they had no new cases.
This presumes that defenses of Donald need to be consistent, either with the facts or with each other. I'd say the evidence for that idea doesn't rise to the level of statistical significance.To maintain the analogy, you're forced to concede that the Dems/Media were right this time, and that Donald really did drop the ball.
I'm impressed.