How quickly people rush forward to defend the media.
It is almost as if the protection of our media was written into our foundational document.
Upvote
0
How quickly people rush forward to defend the media.
This would go a lot easier if you could just explain your issues rather than speaking cryptically and expecting people to guess what you meanps note to self, I Never, never take a poster at their word. When the head of the investigation, Schiff, does not die life his sources, why should I believe an anonymous poster on a forum.
Since when has Congress ever needed to go through the courts to issue a subpoena in a congressional investigation? Also, this is not the question you asked earlier. You specifically asked (multiple times) how Congress got Devin Nunes's phone records. That question has been answered multiple times in multiple ways by multiple people all saying the same thing.furthermore.... yes there is more.... how did they get a private citizens phone records without going through the courts?
furthermore.... yes there is more.... how did they get a private citizens phone records without going through the courts?
Merry Christmas, this is my gift for you.
Now I don't see you asking WHY Nunes called Giuliani and Parnas. Why is that ?
He's part of the Guiliani prayer chain?
making it tougher to pursue frivolous lawsuits targeting free speech.
Nunes is a “public figure”, Nick was made one (against His will, apparently). Did CNN admit to defamation?Like CNN did with Nick?
CNN settlement with Covington student Nick Sandmann a win for the 'little guy,' expert says
Free speech does not cover libel
Nunes is a “public figure”, Nick was made one (against His will, apparently). Did CNN admit to defamation?
Devin Nunes sues CNN for $435M over ‘false and defamatory’ Ukraine story
The 47-page lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, accuses the liberal network of publishing “numerous egregiously false and defamatory” statements about Nunes on Nov. 22, 2019 when journalist Vicky Ward reported claims that Nunes met with Ukranian prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, in Vienna in 2018 to dig "up dirt" on Hunter and Joe Biden.
And guess who:
. “It was obvious that his lies were part of a thinly-veiled attempt to obstruct justice and to trick either the United States Attorney or House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Adam Schiff into offering ‘immunity’ in return for information’ about [Nunes].”
The settlement was not disclosed unless you’re holding back a link?
A [Virginia] judge concludes that the lawmaker's $435 million libel suit has hardly anything at all to do with the state. The case is transferred to New York, a more convenient forum for CNN.
The highly litigious Nunes is asserting $435 million in damages (a comical amount that doesn't include additionally claimed interest) over what he alleges to be a "demonstrably false hit piece" about a meeting between him and an ex-Ukrainian prosecutor to discuss dirt on Joe Biden. CNN's source is said to be a lawyer for Lev Parnas, an indicted associate of President Donald Trump's own attorney Rudy Giuliani. Nunes insists he never met with the Ukrainian, didn't tell Parnas anything of the sort, and that CNN had obvious reasons to doubt a source facing prosecution.
Nunes filed the case in Virginia, the same state where he's suing a fake cow and others on social media. His legal efforts ... have been credited with spurring Virginia lawmakers to pass a SLAPP bill, making it tougher to pursue frivolous lawsuits targeting free speech.
Yawn. Another Nunes Nothingburger. He never tires of wasting time, does he?
There is a poster here that thinks you are wasting your time posting about an issue from December of 2019
It shows that it's the first time Nunes has gone berserk with a nine-figure lawsuit...
...and it won't be the last time he fails.
Ambiguous questions get ambiguous answers.
noted.
The settlement amount was not disclosed unless you’re holding back a link?
possibly, what will you say if he wins?