This is all anecdotal and evades the responsibility you have to support a claim which I and others are fairly certain you invented through a combination of an active imagination and speculation.
I see. So your systematic methodology is to tear-down the observed and experiential statements made by others who did not make what they saw and heard into a scientific, proof-gathering endeavor, thus trying to relegate them to silence, or trying to show that you've won the day by allegedly having dismantled their claim in the eyes of others in order to put to rest what YOU have not seen nor heard. Very crafty indeed.
Well, frankly, I don't really care at all if you believe me. If you look back through this thread, I at no time begged, "expose4ever, please, please, please believe me..." I rest in the confidence that there are many others out there who have seen and heard what I have stated, in varying degrees, and so those folks and I can relate while you hide within your little bubble spouting those fancy identifiers that are rooted in a fallacy defined by your own ignorance and lack of personally observed evidence for what is being claimed.
If I were making it up, then I would not rest in the confidence of what I know to be true. I might be all aquiver inside, hoping that you never launch out on your own to read and watch what is out there, only to discover that there is a total vacuum in relation to what I have said. You seem to enjoy posing as some sort of bastion against hearsay. Well, that's fine so long as you don't try to use it as a battering ram against what you can discover for yourself when challenged. Evidence can be a two-way street when facing someone who is little more than a mere antagonist with a chip on his shoulder, or an axe to grind. Having doubts about the merits of what someone says who did not make their observations into some sort of scienctific endeavor for evidence collection, and then labeling their claims as "made up," etc., that's nothing but blind doubt, to which you are perfectly entitled. Nobody here is out to take you out to the wood shed for your doubts. I too firmly believe in what Paul said when he instructed us to "Prove all things." Great.
You have made the counter-
claim that I made it up, and then you cower behind the idea that evidence for claims is all one-sided. Well, I don't subscribe to such a manipulative system of Pharisaical, Clintonesque slight-of-hand. A punk challenged me last night to PROVE that God exists, and that he would then follow Christ. I countered him with the fact that he can't prove God DOESN'T exist, only to show that going down that road is nothing more than a dead end. Dude, you derailed nothing in the thinking of those who have seen and heard what I have stated. For all others, you have the right to disbelieve, but the day is coming when we will ALL see the infiltrations is the islamic, Fascist system of thought.
The liberal media is continuously demonstrating its friendly leanings toward islam, even though mainstream islamics cast homosexuals off high rise buildings, hang them, or execute them by other means, and are known widely to abuse, beat and demean women, and you're sitting there casting fallacy language around against the observations I've made as if there's no merits for possibility, and on the basis of your own ignorance and/or agenda, whichever the case may be. The leftist acceptance of islam should give pause to your doubts, but I suspect you're one of those who believes MSNBC, CNN and all the other leftist propaganda machines with blind indifference to evidence for THEIR claims. Hey, you have that right, but you're not going to win the day in this discussion so easily.
While holding my feet to the fire, you're also standing in the flames of the same fire.
Jr
