Did Nancy use the "B" word?

JohnAshton · Nov 15, 2019

JacksBratt, you have been inaccurate and incomplete in your comments.

The facts, sir, nothing but the facts. Witnesses under oath have been willing to say that Trump did X and Y and Z.

Those who won't go under oath say Trump has not done these things.

Trump is going to be impeached, the Senate will not convict, and the GOP with Trump will be ripped apart next year.

A_Thinker · Nov 15, 2019

JacksBratt said:
My fave... when Hillary said that they had to duck and run under a hail of gunfire... when the video showed a nice calm professional welcome... Doh!

Fortunately, that is not a feature of our current circumstances ...

A_Thinker · Nov 15, 2019

JacksBratt said:
But.. Keep searching for something to bring Trump down... good luck...

It's been found. Whether it brings Trump down ... will ultimately depend upon the American public's view of the ultimate impeachment charges. Currently, a slim majority of Americans think that the president should be impeached and removed.

P.S Schiff is performing admirably.

A_Thinker · Nov 15, 2019

JohnAshton said:
JacksBratt, you have been inaccurate and incomplete in your comments.

The facts, sir, nothing but the facts. Witnesses under oath have been willing to say that Trump did X and Y and Z.

Those who won't go under oath say Trump has not done these things.

Trump is going to be impeached, the Senate will not convict, and the GOP with Trump will be ripped apart next year.

Yup ... Roger Stone was just found guilty of all of the seven counts with which he was charged.

Bolton is writing a behind-the-scenes memoir next year.

Trump and all of his cronies ... are slowly going down ...

JohnAshton · Nov 15, 2019

Trump will be toppling around on stumps when Bolton's book is published.

JacksBratt · Nov 15, 2019

Yarddog said:
There is more testimony to be heard but from what the witnesses have testified to this far, Bribery fits.

What the witnesses have testified? By this you mean all the third party hearsay? Never permissible.

This is a

JacksBratt · Nov 15, 2019

JohnAshton said:
Trump is not a Christian and does not embrace Christian principles.

So.... you would vote for The Democrats? Who obviously are anti bible, anti Christian, anti white and anti male?

The left is basically anti Christian.. The right... is working toward more Christian and biblical values.

JacksBratt · Nov 15, 2019

jgarden said:
Did Nancy use the "B" word?

It makes perfect sense for Pelosi and the Democrats to replace "quid pro quo" in favour of its English equivalent, "bribery"- interpreting Latin phrases has never been one of the American public's strengths and the Constitution itself makes specific reference to the term "bribery" as one of the high crimes and misdemeanours that would lead to impeachment!

That's fine.. but not one of the witnesses could point out where the "quid pro quo" was.. in the transcript.

They asked them what, in the transcript, showed a "Quid pro Quo" and all you heard was crickets..... as they sat there with dumb looks on their faces.

JacksBratt · Nov 15, 2019

JohnAshton said:
JacksBratt, you have been inaccurate and incomplete in your comments.

The facts, sir, nothing but the facts. Witnesses under oath have been willing to say that Trump did X and Y and Z.

Those who won't go under oath say Trump has not done these things.

Trump is going to be impeached, the Senate will not convict, and the GOP with Trump will be ripped apart next year.

Third person hearsay will not impeach Trump... The "whistle blower" will not be brought in under oath because the truth is..... there was no Quid pro quo.. no law broken... no case.. no impeachment...

th1bill · Nov 15, 2019

JohnAshton said:
Give it up, joshua 1 9. The offer of bribery and an extortion are obvious: those are crimes. The House can decide what is grounds for impeachment, not the citizenry. The House has made it abundantly clear that Trump has committed impeachable offenses.

End of story.

JA, please excuse my arrogant stupidity but can you list the provable offenses of either Common Law or of the Constitutional Law?

I am doing my meager best to keep up with Shiff and Nancy but the Democrats and the Republicans are so much smarter than any Independent such as this old Blues and Country singer. [Oh, footnote: Just like GW, President Trump belongs to no party. He ran on the GOP Ticket to benifit his chance of winning, he played the Historical odds.]

Yarddog · Nov 15, 2019

JacksBratt said:
What the witnesses have testified? By this you mean all the third party hearsay? Never permissible.

This is a View attachment 266742

The witnesses have confirmed what Trump officials have stated occurred. There is also a difference between a Congressional investigation and a court hearing which limits testimony.

JohnAshton · Nov 15, 2019

JacksBratt said:
Third person hearsay will not impeach Trump... The "whistle blower" will not be brought in under oath because the truth is..... there was no Quid pro quo.. no law broken... no case.. no impeachment...

Anything but third person hearsay, my friend. Yes, he will be impeached. He will not be convicted in the Senate. Yes, quid quo pro happened again and again.

JohnAshton · Nov 15, 2019

th1bill, you are no blushing newby. Impeachment in Congress is governed only by the Constitution, which states only Congress decides what is impeachable. You know that. Don't pretend.

jgarden · Nov 15, 2019

A_Thinker said:
It's been found. Whether it brings Trump down ... will ultimately depend upon the American public's view of the ultimate impeachment charges. Currently, a slim majority of Americans think that the president should be impeached and removed.

P.S Schiff is performing admirably.

Trump's Republican colleagues in Congress must be getting increasingly frustrated of being forced inventing new and novel excuses to put a positive "spin" on 3 years of blunders and incompetence - virtually all of this President's own making!

Now congressional Republicans are confronted with major damage control - providing this President with a "face saving" excuse for posting tweets intended to "smear" the reputation of the former Ambassador to the Ukraine to coincide at the very moment she is testifying before the House Committee being televised nationally!

Democrat Adam Schiff correctly noted that not only were the President's tweets intended to intimidate the current witness, but by extension he was sending the same message to all other witnesses who may be considering testifying before the Committee!

This is just another example of "witness tampering" - a charge for which the President's close advisor, Roger Stone, was just convicted this very morning!

JacksBratt · Nov 15, 2019

jgarden said:
Trump's Republican colleagues in Congress must be getting increasingly frustrated of being forced inventing new and novel excuses to put a positive "spin" on 3 years of blunders and incompetence - virtually all of this President's own making!

Now congressional Republicans are confronted with major damage control - providing this President with a "face saving" excuse for posting tweets intended to "smear" the reputation of the former Ambassador to the Ukraine to coincide at the very moment she is testifying before the House Committee being televised nationally!

Democrat Adam Schiff correctly noted that not only were the President's tweets intended to intimidate the current witness, but by extension he was sending the same message to all other witnesses who may be considering testifying before the Committee!

This is just another example of "witness tampering" - a charge for which the President's close advisor, Roger Stone, was just convicted this very morning!

As soon as Trump was elected... the gears were put in motion to impeach him..

This is just that last ditch effort as it is abundantly clear that nobody can beat him in the coming election...

Maybe the Dems should have started working on doing things for their country instead of focusing all the money and effort on getting the President impeached....

Maybe they should have found some possible leaders that could actually bring something to the table in this upcoming election.

JohnAshton · Nov 15, 2019

It is clear that Trump will be beat like a drum in the coming election.

Trump et al should have been working for the country instead of trying to enrich themselves.

No GOP leaders will be able to step up when Trump falls from power.

friend of · Nov 15, 2019

JohnAshton said:
The offer of bribery and an extortion are obvious:

Obvious? Obvious where? Please be more specific. That's the most subjective thing I've read.

JohnAshton · Nov 15, 2019

friend of said:
Obvious? Obvious where? Please be more specific. That's the most subjective thing I've read.

Your comment, after all the evidence and testimony and hearings, is "the most subjective thing" I've ever read.

Trump is a malicious criminal, friend of, nothing but.

Biblewriter · Nov 15, 2019

JohnAshton said:
Source, please.

This is explicitly stated in the Bible in Numbers 25:29-34.

St. Helens · Nov 15, 2019

ADMIN HAT ON
This thread has undergone a ratings cleanup.
The rating system is meant to reward or encourage members - not voice disagreement or mock.
ADMIN HAT OFF

Did Nancy use the "B" word?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Searching for Truth

Searching for Truth

Searching for Truth

Searching for Truth

A Believer/Follower

Senior Contributor

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Senior Veteran

Searching for Truth

Well-Known Member

A private in Gods army

Well-Known Member

Senior Member

I stand with Israel

Similar threads