New Video Exposes Planned Parenthood Doc Describing Harvested Baby Organs

dogs4thewin said:

Yes, indeed I am a virgin. I UNDERSTAND the urges. We are sexual creatures, BUT just because you have urges does not mean you must ACT on them. That IS a choice and as such if you make the "wrong" choice you still should expect to possibily deal with some risks of that choice.

Click to expand...

My point is that your naivety has led you to beleive that just stating something will actually stop people having sex and solve the issue of abortion.

Once again, rather than stay on topic the trolls and liberals pile in to attempt a derail.

dogs4thewin said:

I am not STUPID I know it will not stop people, but it should. If you do not want children not having sex is a foolproof way to ensure you will not have them.

Click to expand...

Ask them this question: What is the most effective means someone can employ to prevent being arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol?

The answer of course is don't drive while under the influence of alcohol.

However liberals (in general) refuse to apply that simple logic to the question of pregnancy prevention. Instead the policy they advocate for is never even try to tell anyone to abstain from sex just make sure they know where the nearest Planned Parenthood abortion mill is.

Sistrin said:

Ask them this question: What is the most effective means someone can employ to prevent being arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol?

The answer of course is don't drive while under the influence of alcohol.

However liberals (in general) refuse to apply that simple logic to the question of pregnancy prevention. Instead the policy they advocate for is never even try to tell anyone to abstain from sex just make sure they know where the nearest Planned Parenthood abortion mill is.

Click to expand...

If only mankind had invented something to prevent pregnancies from happening while also allowing for sexual encounters. And if only the means to achieve this were taught to people, at the optimum at such a young age that they implement them when they become sexually active.

Oh well, one can dream.

Nithavela said:

If only mankind had invented something to prevent pregnancies from happening while also allowing for sexual encounters. And if only the means to achieve this were taught to people, at the optimum at such a young age that they implement them when they become sexually active.

Oh well, one can dream.

Click to expand...

Disingenuous response. I said most effective, not only.

About as disingeneous as representing liberals as advocating abortion as the sole alternative to abstinence.

Sistrin said:

Ask them this question: What is the most effective means someone can employ to prevent being arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol?

The answer of course is don't drive while under the influence of alcohol.

Click to expand...

Let's take alcohol out of the equation and ask them this question: What is the most effective means someone can employ to prevent being in an automobile accident?

The answer of course is don't drive at all. Period.

Why our schools encourage risky behavior from our young people in "driver's ed," instead of engaging in the far simpler and 100% effective "Abstinence Only" approach to driving is reckless. Instead the policy they advocate for is never even try to tell anyone to abstain from driving; just make sure they know where the nearest emergency room chop shop is.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Sistrin said:

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Click to expand...

Not even a token rebuttal?

Erik Nelson said:

Stop Planned Parenthood Harvesting and Selling Babies’ Organs | American Center for Law and Justice

Click to expand...

What a bunch of hooey.

kiwimac said:

What a bunch of hooey.

Click to expand...

Certain people make fun of Catholic Priests for staying celibate (to devote themselves to the Church & charity)

Then those same certain people, embracing "science", turn around and abort (kill) all their own children

From a purely scientific perspective, what exactly is the difference?

(Besides the one devoting themselves to caring for other people throughout the rest of society, and the other caring only for themselves & their own perceived pleasure)

Erik Nelson said:

From a purely scientific perspective, what exactly is the difference?

Click to expand...

It is futile to evoke the medical and biological science governing the human reproductive process with any pro-abortionist, as under no circumstances will they acknowledge it. To the pro-abortion crowd, abortion is a sacrament, a sacrificial religious practice and no amount of fact, scientific or otherwise, will ever influence or alter their devotion to that practice.

Sistrin said:

It is futile to evoke the medical and biological science governing the human reproductive process with any pro-abortionist, as under no circumstances will they acknowledge it. To the pro-abortion crowd, abortion is a sacrament, a sacrificial religious practice and no amount of fact, scientific or otherwise, will ever influence or alter their devotion to that practice.

Click to expand...

What a bunch of rot.

LivingWordUnity said:

Related to this is that science has discovered that the cells of the mother's baby live on in her brain.

Source:
Scientific American -Scientists Discover Children’s Cells Living in Mothers’ Brains
.

Click to expand...

I ate kalamari and now have it's cells within me

kiwimac said:

What a bunch of rot.

Click to expand...

Sadly it is the truth. See post number 96.