You're not a prophet? Then you're not mature!

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,777
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
How can you KNOW that ... without the scriptures ???
I don't have to know that. Some of my arguments are based on YOUR assumptions. If you believe all these so-called cults are real Christians, just say so.
 
Upvote 0

A_Thinker

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 23, 2004
11,911
9,064
Midwest
✟953,784.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And how did they know those 'scriptures' to be the inerrant word of God?
Is there any history ... of the Jews previous to the fall of Jerusalem ... which posits that they didn't believe their scripture was inerrant ?
 
Upvote 0

A_Thinker

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 23, 2004
11,911
9,064
Midwest
✟953,784.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok let's be clear. Should I follow the next burning bush? Why or why not?
Jesus has warned us to be careful who we follow ... whether they come with miraculous works or not.

So then, do we listen and heed Jesus' words as recorded in the scriptures ... or do we see how the next revelation sounds to us ?
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,777
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
@A_Thinker said,
You seem to want to avoid the conclusion of a self-authenticating voice. But Adam and Eve didn't 'check it out with Scripture', nor Enoch, Noah, Abraham, and Moses. They had no Scripture. And even the later men who DID have it, they still needed a self-authenticating Voice to authenticate Scripture - to persuade them it was the inerrant word of God. That's called the Inward Witness.
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,777
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Jesus has warned us to be careful who we follow ... whether they come with miraculous works or not.

So then, do we listen and heed Jesus' words as recorded in the scriptures ... or do we see how the next revelation sounds to us ?
That was my question to you. I've already answered it on the epistemology thread.

(Sigh). Should I, or not, obey the next burning bush? If so, on what basis?
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,777
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
A_Thinker,

Put yourselves in the shoes of a prophet. You hear a voice telling you about a future event (foretelling). If the Voice isn't self-authenticating:
(1) How do you know the message to be true? Can you check it out with Scripture?
(2) How you even know yourself to be a true prophet, and not the victim of a deceiver?
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,777
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Is there any history ... of the Jews previous to the fall of Jerusalem ... which posits that they didn't believe their scripture was inerrant ?
It's not a question of what they believed. Anyone can believe in a false religion. A rational man will have sufficient warrant for what he believes, especially about religion. You're saying Scripture is the basis of knowledge. That makes zero sense because first I need a way (an authoritative basis) to KNOW whether Scripture is the inerrant word of God This authoritative basis - whatever it is - is my highest authority, because it is on that basis I decide whether to accept or reject a book such the Koran, the Book of Mormon, or the Bible.

Thus the claim that Scripture is my highest authority is pure nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

A_Thinker

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 23, 2004
11,911
9,064
Midwest
✟953,784.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
@A_Thinker said,
You seem to want to avoid the conclusion of a self-authenticating voice. But Adam and Eve didn't 'check it out with Scripture', nor Enoch, Noah, Abraham, and Moses. They had no Scripture. And even the later men who DID have it, they still needed a self-authenticating Voice to authenticate Scripture - to persuade them it was the inerrant word of God. That's called the Inward Witness.
The scriptures don't speak much of an "inward witness" (i.e. self-authenticating voice). Jesus said that our hearts are wicked ... and not to be trusted.

Mark 7:20-23

And He was saying, "That which proceeds out of the man, that is what defiles the man. "For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries, deeds of coveting and wickedness, as well as deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride and foolishness. All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man."

Jeremiah said the same ...

Jeremiah 17:9

The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,777
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The scriptures don't speak much of an "inward witness" (i.e. self-authenticating voice). Jesus said that our hearts are wicked ... and not to be trusted.

Mark 7:20-23

And He was saying, "That which proceeds out of the man, that is what defiles the man. "For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries, deeds of coveting and wickedness, as well as deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride and foolishness. All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man."

Jeremiah said the same ...

Jeremiah 17:9

The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
Actually it does speak of the witness in our hearts. You might want to do a study on the Greek word for 'witness'. The Reformed theologians didn't fabricate it.

Scripture doesn't speak of 'Trinity' by the way. You're making a moot point.
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,777
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
It should be a simple question.

What do YOU know of Christ ... which is not found in the scriptures ?
Him. I told you, the human mind can't find Him in Scripture, for reasons that I gave you. You need a direct revelation.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
27,914
7,993
NW England
✟1,053,319.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
(Sigh). Suppose a man walks up to you and says, "I'm the Son of God. Leave all your possessions IMMEDIATELY and follow me."

I mean, that's what the disciples did, right?

Not exactly.
Jesus didn't tell his disciples he was the Son of God, nor did he tell them to leave their possessions immediately.
Jesus was baptised in the river Jordan, at which the Spirit descended on him like a dove and God's voice spoke from heaven. After this he was taken into the wilderness for 40 days. When he came out of the wilderness, Matthew, Mark and Luke say that he started preaching, Matthew 4:12-17, Mark 1:14-15, Luke 4:14-30. Luke then tells that Jesus healed many people and then he called his first disciples, Luke 5:1-11. John tells us that 2 of Jesus' disciples had first followed John the Baptist, but when Jesus walked past and they heard John say "Look, the Lamb of God"; they left John and followed Jesus. One of these disciples was called Andrew, and he went to find his brother, Simon, and told him that he had found the Messiah, John 1:35-42.
It is very likely that the disciples would have heard of, heard or seen Jesus before he called them.

Was that a foolish act on their part? Sounds to me like you would have said, "Sorry, Jesus, let me spend some time checking it out with Scripture.

No, not if I knew of, or had heard things about, the person who was asking me to follow them.
I'm certain people were talking about Jesus before he even began his ministry - son of an unmarried mother who had completely amazed the teachers of the law in the temple at the age of 12, and later started walking round the countryside preaching instead of carrying on the family carpentry business.
The disciples may have seen the dove at Jesus' baptism, heard, what they thought was, thunder and later heard Jesus preaching repentance. They may have heard of him being thrown out the synagogue and nearly stoned to death - Luke then says that he healed many people. Andrew had even heard John the baptist's testimony about Jesus.

This creates an epistemological challenge. When someone CLAIMS to speak the truth, or CLAIMS to speak on God's behalf, or CLAIMS to be a prophet,

Jesus didn't.
He was baptised in the Jordan, started to teach, healed people and then called various men to follow him. Natural human curiosity would probably have led them to do that; they almost certainly didn't realise then that it would be a lifelong, and life-changing, commitment.
They didn't know that Jesus was the Messiah until much later - after he had healed many people, bought a couple of dead children back to life, walked on water, fed 5000+ people and so on. Even then, they didn't work it out for themselves, it was revealed to them by God.

When someone CLAIMS to speak the truth, or CLAIMS to speak on God's behalf, or CLAIMS to be a prophet, how do we authenticate the claim? How do we KNOW it to be true or false?

That's exactly what I've been asking you.
My answer is "if it is found in, or lines up with, Scripture". You seem not to like that answer.

Epistemology is the question of what do we know and how do we know it.

For you, maybe.
I just read and trust the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

A_Thinker

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 23, 2004
11,911
9,064
Midwest
✟953,784.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Actually it does speak of the witness in our hearts. You might want to do a study on the Greek word for 'witness'. The Reformed theologians didn't fabricate it.
The scriptures say that God's Spirit testifies to our spirits ... that we are the children of God. I think that's in Romans.

I don't know of any other scriptural example of this idea ...
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,777
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Not exactly.
Jesus didn't tell his disciples he was the Son of God, nor did he tell them to leave their possessions immediately.
Jesus was baptised in the river Jordan, at which the Spirit descended on him like a dove and God's voice spoke from heaven. After this he was taken into the wilderness for 40 days. When he came out of the wilderness, Matthew, Mark and Luke say that he started preaching, Matthew 4:12-17, Mark 1:14-15, Luke 4:14-30. Luke then tells that Jesus healed many people and then he called his first disciples, Luke 5:1-11. John tells us that 2 of Jesus' disciples had first followed John the Baptist, but when Jesus walked past and they heard John say "Look, the Lamb of God"; they left John and followed Jesus. One of these disciples was called Andrew, and he went to find his brother, Simon, and told him that he had found the Messiah, John 1:35-42.
It is very likely that the disciples would have heard of, heard or seen Jesus before he called them.
I've given too many examples of the need for a self-authenticating voice. You've got a huge burden of proof unmet as yet.

No, not if I knew of, or had heard things about, the person who was asking me to follow them.
So if i heard some positive rumors about a man claiming to be God, I should drop all when He calls and follow Him. Um..not a cogent epistemology.

Jesus didn't.
That's funny because if this were a debate with a JW, you would insist that Jesus DID make messianic and/or deistic claims of Himself.



That's exactly what I've been asking you.
My answer is "if it is found in, or lines up with, Scripture". You seem not to like that answer.
I like answers that work. See my prev last several posts for scenarios that don't fit the Sola Scriptura model.
 
Upvote 0