essentialsaltes
Stranger in a Strange Land
- Oct 17, 2011
- 33,270
- 36,592
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
Upvote
0
But the whole story was a sham: The only “expert” cited by NBC in support of its key claim was the firm New Knowledge
She is still a much better presidential candidate than Biden, Trump, Warren, and Harris.Old news. ETA: And wing2000 winged in before me.
Since Gabbard announced her intention to run on Jan. 11, there have been at least 20 Gabbard stories on three major Moscow-based English-language websites affiliated with or supportive of the Russian government: RT, the Russian-owned TV outlet; Sputnik News, a radio outlet; and Russia Insider, a blog that experts say closely follows the Kremlin line. The CIA has called RT and Sputnik part of "Russia's state-run propaganda machine."
All three sites celebrated Gabbard's announcement, defended her positions on Russia and her 2017 meeting with Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad, and attacked those who have suggested she is a pawn for Moscow.
It's a 30 paragraph article, and New Knowledge is only mentioned in the last two.
It's a 30 paragraph article, and New Knowledge is only mentioned in the last two.
NBC made its own analysis of the Russian propaganda sites RT & Sputnik.Oh...who are the other experts mentioned?
NBC made its own analysis of the Russian propaganda sites RT & Sputnik.
She is still a much better presidential candidate than Biden, Trump, Warren, and Harris.
Oh...who are the other experts mentioned?
A man named Josh Russell is also mention as an expert. I suppose you could check him out.NBC made its own analysis of the Russian propaganda sites RT & Sputnik.
So NBC just fired up it's Russian counter-intelligence team and had them pour through the data? You're kidding, right?
We are discussing [well ok, I am in post #16... your discussion of New Knowledge is nonresponsive to my point.] the public 'news' websites RT and Sputnik. NBC fired up its web browsers and looked at the stories promulgated by these sites that are Russian propaganda [source: CIA].
We are discussing [well ok, I am in post #16... your discussion of New Knowledge is nonresponsive to my point.] the public 'news' websites RT and Sputnik. NBC fired up its web browsers and looked at the stories promulgated by these sites that are Russian propaganda [source: CIA].
Here is the original New York Times article which reported on New Knowledge's Russian bot false flag:
And as for RT America, and Sputnik, they are progressive.
Oh so it's the CIA classifying them as "pro-Tulsi Gabbard propaganda" and not NBC?
I must have missed that part of the article....can you quote it?
And as for RT America, and Sputnik, they are progressive. Of course they back folks like Tulsi.
This remains irrelevant. My claim in post #16 does not rely on New Knowledge as a source.
Sorry, comrade, the CIA says they are channels of Russian state propaganda. [Source: RT]
The CIA says these sites are Russian state propaganda.
A man named Josh Russell is also mention as an expert. I suppose you could check him out.
Yeah, but the claim today was that Russian bots were to blame:
Why do you think they are "progressive"?