As in .Various other passages show deeds matter: Sheep and Goats - Matthew 25:31-46
Even at a more basic level: Forgiveness Matthew 6:14:15
The distinction is the need to cooperate with grace. We have a choice.
The difference between "intellectual assent": even devils believe in jesus and "formed faith" which has charity. No amount of good deeds are enough to save . So this is not "salvation by works" . Such deeds are essential, but not sufficient.
This is one of the problems I had with Lutheranism at one stage in my Journey - the idea that Christs passion sufficed to save us, no matter what we then do. I think stated by luther that he could commit adultery 100 times and would not lose his salvation: the concept of "snow colourded dung hill". That belief seemed to contravene both your scripture, the ones I mentioned and many others.
But I think we must cooperate with grace, but are then only saved by grace through faith. No amount of such deeds are sufficent by themselves. So faith must be more than just "intellectual assent" it needs to be formed faith, that is with charity.
Nor do I think we are automatons. By virtue of faith we do not automatically do those things that are needed for salvation, we still have free will every day. We can do the work of "sheep and goats" or not.
One interesting test of a persons belief. Is to consider what happens at judgement. (if you are not shaking like a jelly unable to speak at that point!!) - Can you imagine our Lord saying "but I told you I was hungry and you did not feed me (and reminding of 100 other scriptures) and our trying to sayto our Lord "but I didnt think those things mattered because I can do nothing and just rely on your mercy". The answer "more fool you" springs to mind!
By not taking it prima facia.How?
If you can take the trouble of putting it forward prima facia, I and maybe others can show you how it doesn't say what you think it says.By not taking it prima facia.
I did. I posted the text. Hence, prima facia.If you can take the trouble of putting it forward prima facia, I and maybe others can show you how it doesn't say what you think it says.
I know. What He said was that His sheep hear His voice and follow.No, our Lord never said that he turns people into robots that are incapable of rejecting him.
Then that’s the law, and not the gospel.
The gospel is the finished work of Christ. He not only bore the punishment for our sin, He also lived the perfect life for us. So in regards to Matt 5:17, He fulfilled the law. If we are in Christ, it’s as if we, too, have fulfilled it.I have a question and a comment.
How do you personally understand what ''the Gospel'' is and means, that would be valuable for dialogue.
Also, Christ said he came not to abolish the law but to fulfill it Matthew 5:17. So it could be argued that following Christ is faith and law combined.
John 10I did. I posted the text. Hence, prima facia.
It does. It means that we read it as it was intended. If I read that the A’s beat the Rangers last night, I don’t need a long explanation that they didn’t take their bats and started beating the other team.John 10
7Therefore Jesus said again, "Very truly I tell you, I am the gate for the sheep.
Very rarely does prima facie convey the actual meaning.
Isn't the revelation that faith alone saved Abraham and can similarly save us the REAL good news? Why would Christ need to come into the picture? We could keep believing and finally be found so righteous that God would be fully satisfied, like He was satisfied on Mt Moriah, with Abraham.The gospel is the finished work of Christ. He not only bore the punishment for our sin, He also lived the perfect life for us. So in regards to Matt 5:17, He fulfilled the law. If we are in Christ, it’s as if we, too, have fulfilled it.
And in most cases, when I make a law/gospel distinction, it’s not always the Mosaic law that I have in mind. It’s any rule or work that someone thinks is necessary for salvation apart from faith in Christ. What it’s not is an idea that we can be antinomians and have no law at all. Those who have placed their faith and trust in Christ will be transformed, and will want to do good works, but out of love for Christ and not out fear that one will lose favor with God if they don’t perform.
That's why I keep repeating that God didn't make the credit happen. It's never said anywhere.It does. It means that we read it as it was intended. If I read that the A’s beat the Rangers last night, I don’t need a long explanation that they didn’t take their bats and started beating the other team.
Abraham looked forward to Christ. Sin still needed dealt with.Isn't the revelation that faith alone saved Abraham and can similarly save us the REAL good news? Why would Christ need to come into the picture? We could keep believing and finally be found so righteous that God would be fully satisfied, like He was satisfied on Mt Moriah, with Abraham.
Yes it does.That's why I keep repeating that God didn't make the credit happen. It's never said anywhere.
Yes it does.
Then he believed in the Lord; and He reckoned it to him as righteousness.
— Genesis 15:6
Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom also we have obtained our introduction by faith into this grace in which we stand; and we exult in hope of the glory of God.
— Romans 5:1-2
Abraham looked forward to Christ. Sin still needed dealt with.
Good question.
First, Abraham was justified without the law, second, all the prophets, including Christ, rebuked Israel for not producing fruit ( the land owner sent His Son to collect RENT). No mention of law.To fulfill the Law.
Its irrelevant that the law came later because Christ still had to fulfill that law regardless. Also, didn't Abraham sacrifice sheep to God?First, Abraham was justified without the law, second, all the prophets, including Christ, rebuked Israel for not producing fruit ( the land owner sent His Son to collect RENT). No mention of law.
Why fix it of it ain't broke? Abraham believed and got the same results. We don't want no s*****n Law? And like you mentioned, there was a proto Law: sheep sacrifice. We really don't want no yada yada yada...Its irrelevant that the law came later because Christ still had to fulfill that law regardless. Also, didn't Abraham sacrifice sheep to God?
Genesis 22:6 Abraham took the wood for the burnt offering and placed it on his son Isaac, and he himself carried the fire and the knife. As the two of them went on together, 7 Isaac spoke up and said to his father Abraham, “Father?”
“Yes, my son?” Abraham replied.
“The fire and wood are here,” Isaac said, “but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?”