Would you exchange "privacy" to protect people?

dogs4thewin · Jun 2, 2019

TRVL ONE said:
You are heartless and deceived by the devil just like our government is

How so? I did not say that people did not need protected ( from certain things), but that does not mean that it needs to always be the government, nor that we should not have privacy.

TRVL ONE · Jun 2, 2019

dogs4thewin said:
How so? I did not say that people did not need protected ( from certain things), but that does not mean that it needs to always be the government, nor that we should not have privacy.

Only the government can protect people from being held hostages for days, months and years. They can do this with the right technology and enough resources and no privacy.

If you know another way of protecting people from this let me know

dogs4thewin · Jun 2, 2019

TRVL ONE said:
Only the government can protect people from being held hostages for days, months and years. They can do this with the right technology and enough resources and no privacy.

If you know another way of protecting people from this let me know

how so? If I go to the store and see someone being attacked I can step in and yes use lethal force if needed to stop an attack if you kill someone then they cannot hold people captive anymore.

The Barbarian · Jun 2, 2019

TRVL ONE said:
l

It sounds like you are helping criminals avoid the law?

It's often a way of harassing "the wrong kind of people." Government people spend a huge amount of time trying to figure ways to get around the Constitution.

Never encourage them. If they have legitimate reasons, then it's simple to get a warrant. If not, they have no business going through people's effects. That's what the 4th Amendment is about.

I want them in jail.

The criminals you should be worried about are the ones who have government power behind them.

dogs4thewin · Jun 2, 2019

The Barbarian said:
It's often a way of harassing "the wrong kind of people." Government people spend a huge amount of time trying to figure ways to get around the Constitution.

Never encourage them. If they have legitimate reasons, then it's simple to get a warrant. If not, they have no business going through people's effects. That's what the 4th Amendment is about.

The criminals you should be worried about are the ones who have government power behind them.

once again if I could winner that more than once I would.

Search

Search

Would you exchange "privacy" to protect people?

dogs4thewin

dog lover

More options

TRVL ONE

Active Member

More options

dogs4thewin

dog lover

More options

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy

More options

dogs4thewin

dog lover

More options

Similar threads