By one estimate,
a person who
weighs 150 pounds on the surface of the earth
would weigh approximately 149.92 pounds at 10,000
feet above sea level, .. teeny-tiny.
And here is the figures for gravity:
There is less gravitational force, but by how much? An insignificant amount. The gravitational force of attraction between two objects is given by,
Fg=Gm1m2R2'>Fg=Gm1m2R2Fg=Gm1m2R2 ,
where,
G'>GG is the graviational constant,
R'>RR is the distance between the object's centers, and
m1'>m1m1 and m2'>m2m2 are the masses of the objects.
Instead of finding the variation in force between the aircraft and earth, it would be be better to find the variation in the acceleration due to gravity, g'>gg (as Fg=mag'>Fg=magFg=mag , with ma'>mama being the mass of the airliner)
We have, on earth's surface,
g=GmeRe2'>g=GmeR2eg=GmeRe2
where,
me'>meme is the mass of the earth, and
Re'>ReRe is the radius of the earth.
For the aircraft at an altitude h'>hh above the surface of the earth, this becomes,
gh=Gme(Re+h)2'>gh=Gme(Re+h)2gh=Gme(Re+h)2
Taking ratio, we get,
Taking ratio, we get,
ghg=(1+hRe)−2'>ghg=(1+hRe)−2ghg=(1+hRe)−2
Plugging in numbers, we get, for an airliner cruising at 12 km,
gh=9.773 m s−2'>gh=9.773 m s−2gh=9.773 m s−2,
or about 0.37 % less compared to the sea level value.
This is quite small and would not be noticable to all but the sensitive instruments.
In other words, stick with density because the only place you'll find gravity is in NASA Globe earth math. Just as no engineer figures for the 8" squared per mile + curvature of the globe, no one ever figures for "gravity", .. except for NASA cosmologists in their sci-fi deception on their MK-Ultra brainwashed population. Heck, .. they can figure anything and everything without even leaving the ground, just by looking at a star, .. err, I mean planet, and tell us it's 150 million light years away and give us detailed info on everything including how much water, life, what kind of atmosphere etc. was on the planet 2.325 billion years ago.
Here is what they show us by looking at so called planets through the
Worlds Largest Telescope:
But sorry, I guess our taxpayers money is not enough for them to show us the actual photos of the "planets" in our solar system, .. for that, we'll have to go to NASA artists rendered images.
So, when we look through telescopes and see planets, what exactly are we looking at? Also, where are objects like meteors and comets coming from if not space?
You mean the stars that look like spheres? They are stars, not planets. Some spheres, and others like this:
As far as "meteors", .. I would call it "Cosmological Fireworks", .. you know, used with the "Globe in every classroom" to keep the globe earth deception alive. Amazing what a few magnesium rockets will do to keep the sheeple spinning through the vacuum of sci-fi space, isn't it?
You can detect electricity with certain devices. Has the Moon ever been shown to be generating electromagnetic waves? How is it constantly generating an electromagnetic field in the first place?
I know it creates the tides, .. or,
we can accept the other theory, which is the wobbling of the earth on its 66.6 deg. axis causing the swishing of the water!?
If you would like me to actually go up close to our Flat Earth moon, I and other flat earthers would love to do that, .. even with just one months of NASA's budget I believe we could give you Globe-earthers most of that info. For now, I doubt NASA would give us the real data on our moon, .. for obvious reason$$$. Look how much money they got for putting a Rover in Greenland (or wherever other locations they used here on F.E.?)
They own the imaginary space with the millions and billions and trillions of Carl Sagan sci-fi planets. Anyone with enough money to build a rocket like NASA and associates like Space-X can afford, must ask permission from our
One World Government AKA NASA before launching it. And we know how that would go, just like any big money private expedition to the Antarctic, .. never get the approval, so it ain't gona happen.
Also, if the Moon is self-illuminating, why does it go through phases at all?
God made it to tell "times and seasons" for fisherman. Ah the Wonders of Gods creation!
What's happening to it during a lunar eclipse and when it turns red? Why, when you look at it closely, can you see shadows in its craters and along its surface? How can something that's generating light cast a shadow on anything, like the moon does during a solar eclipse?
This video should explain those questions:
Water isn't the only thing that static electricity has an effect on.
If the Moon is generating static electricity, why doesn't it effect metal and other objects?
And who says it doesn't?
I just picked that ONE, but I'm sure there is a lot more to it than static electricity, .. and again, not getting the BILLIONS of dollars a month to fund deeper investigation does throw a wrench into the spokes of our F.E. tricycle wheel, but we keep on peddling, and eventually we'll have an answer for all that also. I'll check on it, we may already have answers to that?
Me, I just stick to the simple deceptions like the obvious gravity hoax, the expanding universe-vacuum joke, gravitational waves, spacetime fabric full of black holes, .. the ridiculousness of Einstein's "Special Relativity" puns, like his answer to 'Everything' about the imaginary universe:
E=MC^2, .. that one beats them all. I can just see everyone from engineers building roads, to cruise ship captains using this formula when navigating the oceans!?
God already said once for this Earth that was in chaos covered in darkness and disorder: "Let there be light!"
Yet here we go again, this time covering the earth and darkness by creating these Religious science fiction fairytales![/quote][/quote]