Who Was Moses?

Devin P

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2017
1,280
631
31
Michigan
✟99,110.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Devin, there wouldn't be a scripture saying it's the default position if it's the default position. There would be no reason for it.
I linked scripture that provides the exact opposite idea as truth. It's not in scripture because it's not scriptural. I'm not trying to be so harsh, but it's absolutely unscriptural.
 
Upvote 0

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
There are only 12 gates, there's no gate for the church. In order to enter, we must be part of Israel for salvation. I completely understand what you mean, I used to believe literally, exactly the same exact thing.
Please provide a verse that states that we must be part of Israel to achieve salvation.

This will probably come up a lot, so let me introduce one of my concepts now, and try to do so clearly. There is a difference between Israel and the Commonwealth of Israel. Israel is the tribes and converts. The Commonwealth includes (OT) those Gentiles who came to sojourn in the Land but who did not convert and (NT) those Gentiles grafted on, worshiping the God of Israel even if they don't become Jews.


No, it's not a have to. I get to.
Let me put it another way. If you don't do it, is it a sin? You see, when I say a person doesn't HAVE to refrain from pork (don't misinterpret this as being anti-torah please) that it is not a sin. So for example, Messianics who take up observing the Torah do so out of love for God, not because they are trying to avoid sin. It means that those in the Christian churches, who don't observe Shabbat or avoid treif meat, are not sinning. As believers, we are obligated to avoid sin. We don't "get to" sin even though it's wrong.

Well, the punishment I'm referring to, was what banished Israel from God in the first place.
Ah, I suspected we had a potential for misuderstanding here. There was something about the way you said punishment that clued me in that you meant something different.

The covenant with Israel at Sinai was basically, Obey my commandments and you get to live in the promised land. Therefore the punishment for Israel not keeping the commandments was that we would get kicked out of the Land.

There is no where that it is written that if Israel doesn't obey the commandments that God will abandon her. Indeed, if you read the prophets, you'll find that even though God gets angry with Israel, even cries out "I divorce you!", that his love is deeper and he never abandons her, if you read all the way to the end. In fact, there is an entire book, Hosea, devoted to this very issue. The essence of Hosea is that just as Hosea is faithful to his wife despite her prostitution, so God will be faithful to Israel despite her unfaithfulness.

The Lord does cut Israel off from being the his oracle of the gospel due to their disbelief--a disbelief caused by God until the fullness of the Gentiles is come in. But not being God's oracle doesn't mean that he doesn't keep his covenant with them, or that they are not still elect despite their unbelief. As Paul writes about unbelieving Jews in Romans 11:28-29, "As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, for God's gifts and his call are irrevocable."


I understand what you mean by a replacement theology, but it's not so. If I thought that this meant that we were replacing you and your natural place, then absolutely. But as I've made clear before in my previous posts, that's not so. We're not replacing you, we're joining you. There's a huge difference. We're not replacing you, we're the 10 lost tribes, you're the 2 that weren't ever lost. It's not that we replace you, we rejoin you. Just as the parable of the prodigal son reveals. There is no replacing, I'll say it again. We simply join you in being counted among the elect, we do not strip you of your status as elect. You are still His chosen, and His beloved. We, a people who were not His beloved, nor were His elect, become that, just as you are. There is no replacing anyone. The only ones we replace, are those that brought themselves under the curse of the adulterous bride in the first place thousands of years ago. Also, those that are of the bloodline that lack faith in anything other than their works. As I showed in the post I linked previous to this one. Those that have Yeshua as their stumbling block are taken out, because their faith isn't in Elohim, but in themselves. That isn't something that we replace, but יהוה Himself. And this isn't even permanent, it can possibly be undone for some, if those in the awakening become prideful and lose their standing in faith, and become prideful like those that they do replace. But, if Yeshua is your reason for salvation in your heart, there isn't any replacing, period. I can assure you, that no one is replacing you. Your faith is in Yeshua, I can gleam that clearly from the way you present yourself.

You need to read what you yourself wrote, so that you can see its many self-contradictions. You say no one is being replaced, but then you turn around and describe who is being replaced: disbelieving Israel (let's face it, we of the remnant are extremely few). You say you are not stripping Israel of it's election, but you believe that unbelieving Jews are NOT chosen in fact. You are, without being conscious of it I believe, talking out of both sides of your mouth.

Here is the reality of what I see happening in the Two House movement. It begins with the wrongheaded notion that only Israel is saved, and then gets forced into creating a way that Gentile believers in Messiah can be Israel (which is more specific than the Commonwealth of Israel, which they really are a part of). Once Israel envy sets in, the Scriptures get distorted. It procedes to make two errors:
1. It strips the People of Israel (the vast majority of who are not believers) of our election as God's chosen people. It declares it no longer truly Israel.
2. It creates a new Israel: those who believe in Yeshua and keep the commandments.

This sir, SCREAMS Replacement Theology. You can say, "We aren't replacing you," all you want, but if you accept those two assertions above, you have adopted an extreme form of Replacement Theology.

Just to let you know, Replacement theology is my big "thing." I hate it, because it has led to the persecution and death of millions of Jews. It is the fertile ground upon which anti-Semitism grows. It is a heretical doctrine that is a threat to the People of Israel. So you may notice me getting more emotional when we talk about it. It's not you personally. It's the issue.

Yeah, I'm sorry for being so blunt with my last messages, I took some things incorrectly from the tone I thought you were conveying.

Don't even worry about it, my friend. Like I said, it's my fault -- I realize that my blunt style in the forum, especially when you can't see my face or hear my voice, can sometimes be interpreted as being hostile. That's why I figured, since we were going to get into theology pretty deeply, it would be a good idea for me to tell you what my actual attitude was. :) :) :)

Those from the house of Judah, that would be getting replaced, wouldn't be saved in the first place, because again, their faith isn't in Yeshua, it's in themselves.
If you spent quality time around religious Jews, you would find out for yourself that they do indeed have faith in God, not themselves. In fact, given this sort of anti-Jewish statement that shows such a grave misunderstanding, I suggest you do exactly that: contact the Rabbi of a local synagogue and tell him that you would like to learn more about Jews and Judaism and would like to attend prayers and maybe some Torah Studies. Just a suggestion.

I notice you do admit in this quote of you that there ARE those getting replaced (the overwhelming vast majority of the known People of Israel, the Jews). You simply excuse doing so by saying, "well, but they're not saved."


They had no chance for salvation in the first place, unless they repent, and find salvation in the One who freely gives it.

This is no fault of their own. It is God himself who places a veil over their eyes, for the sake of the fullness of the Gentiles coming in. Do you think that the Lord will punish them for something which is not their own fault? Consider that Paul says of unbelieving Jews, "and so all Israel shall be saved." Romans 11:26

Shabbat shalom, my friend.
 
Upvote 0

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
I just deleted 2/3 of this post. :sigh: Give me a minute to go back and get the earlier verses again.

1 Peter 1:1 - Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,

There is dispute over whom Peter actually wrote to, whether he was writing to Jewish believers within those churches, or whether he was writing to the Gentiles there, who made up the majority.

As I have not studied this personally, and don't really have an opinion, it's better that I simply not comment on its actual meaning.

Your interpretation if I understand it, is that this verse indicates Peter is writing to Israel in dispersion, but the Churches were Gentile, so it would lead one to conclude that the Gentile Believers were considered a part of Israel. Not bad -- I'll give you some credit for this one. But it's weak. It's weak because we don't have a consensus about what the verse means. And it's weak because, AGAIN, it simply doesn't state that Gentile believers are Israel--you can only infer it, if at all.

My own way of dealing with this verse is that I simply say, "Well, what does the length and breadth of the rest of Scripture say? What can shine light on this?" And the rest of the New Testament makes it clear that there are Jews and Greek, Israel and the Nations. It makes it clear (Acts 15) that Gentiles do not need to be circumcised and keep the commandments.

Matthew 15:24 - But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

This verse comes up in here a lot. There is disagreement over whom the "lost sheep" are. I've written entire long posts giving my view and documenting it. I'll try to give you the short version, since this post is growing ever longer.

This verse cannot be referring to the house of Israel aka the 10 tribes who are dispersed among the nations, because during his life, Yeshua never went out to them. He stayed within the Land. Indeed, you can count on one hand the number of encounters Jesus had with Gentiles that are recorded in the gospels. So who DID Jesus reach out to in the years he was here on this planet? Sinful Jews -- prostitutes, tax collectors, etc. This leads me to conclude that the "Israel" in the verse is the larger Israel, the People of Israel, and that those sheep who are lost are sinful Jews.
 
Upvote 0

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
I'm going to go slowly. PLease try not to reply if you see only part of this post answered. I just spent an hour on a post, and 2/3 of it got deleted. So, I may save part of the work as I go. I'll remove this paragraph when it's ready to be replied to.

Romans 11:13-24
17 But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, although a wild olive shoot, were grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing root[c] of the olive tree,
18 do not be arrogant toward the branches. If you are, remember it is not you who support the root, but the root that supports you. 19 Then you will say, “Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.” 20 That is true. They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand fast through faith. So do not become proud, but fear. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will he spare you. 22 Note then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God's kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness. Otherwise you too will be cut off. 23 And even they, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God has the power to graft them in again. 24 For if you were cut from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these, the natural branches, be grafted back into their own olive tree

Here Paul talks about Israel. The good olive tree is Israel.
I disagree. The Olive Tree is the Oracle of God, not Israel. Israel was once the Oracle of God for the World. That is no longer true. Israel does not dispense the gospel because of its unbelief, and so its branches were broken off. Gentile believers, being grafted on, are still Gentiles. You need to understand how grafting works. If I graft peach branches onto a plum root, the peach branches don't become a plum tree.

Romans 2:28-29
28For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: 29But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, andnot in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

I'm not sure why you included this verse. You don't claim to b a Jew.

Here are some examples of the Apostles writing letters to Gentile churches. Yet, here's how they describe them:

James 1:1 -
James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.

James was not writing to Gentile Churches. He wrote during the earliest years of the Church when all the believers were Jews.

1 Peter 1:1 -
1 Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,

There is dispute over whom Peter actually wrote to, whether he was writing to Jewish believers within those churches, or whether he was writing to the Gentiles there, who made up the majority.

As I have not studied this personally, and don't really have an opinion, it's better that I simply not comment on its actual meaning.

Your interpretation if I understand it, is that this verse indicates Peter is writing to Israel in dispersion, but the Churches were Gentile, so it would lead one to conclude that the Gentile Believers were considered a part of Israel. Not bad -- I'll give you some credit for this one. But it's weak. It's weak because we don't have a consensus about what the verse means. And it's weak because, AGAIN, it simply doesn't state that Gentile believers are Israel--you can only infer it, if at all.

My own way of dealing with this verse is that I simply say, "Well, what does the length and breadth of the rest of Scripture say? What can shine light on this?" And the rest of the New Testament makes it clear that there are Jews and Greek, Israel and the Nations. It makes it clear (Acts 15) that Gentiles do not need to be circumcised and keep the commandments.

Matthew 15:24 - But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

This verse comes up in here a lot. There is disagreement over whom the "lost sheep" are. I've written entire long posts giving my view and documenting it. I'll try to give you the short version, since this post is growing ever longer.

This verse cannot be referring to the house of Israel aka the 10 tribes who are dispersed among the nations, because during his life, Yeshua never went out to them. He stayed within the Land. Indeed, you can count on one hand the number of encounters Jesus had with Gentiles that are recorded in the gospels. So who DID Jesus reach out to in the years he was here on this planet? Sinful Jews -- prostitutes, tax collectors, etc. This leads me to conclude that the "Israel" in the verse is the larger Israel, the People of Israel, and that those sheep who are lost are sinful Jews.

Here's God using a prophet to describe this. This is one, of dozens of verses describing this very thing.

Hosea 2:23 - And I will sow her unto me in the earth; and I will have mercy upon her that had not obtained mercy; and I will say to them which were not my people, Thou artmy people; and they shall say, Thou art my God.

Was Israel ever NOT His people? No. Who were not called His people? Gentiles.
In the Old Testament, only the People of Israel were His People. That is no longer true. There are those of the Nations, aka Gentiles, who are called his people because they believe in Messiah. In essence, God now has TWO peoples which are his: the Children of Israel, and Ekklesia, the Church.

I understand you don't agree, but link scriptures to support your point. I'll try my best to see your side, but you have to show the scriptures.
Every time the NT speaks of Israel and the Nations, every time it mentions "Jews and Greeks" in the Church, it supports my point. Every time it mentions Gentile believers, it supports my point. I will try to compose a post for you with scriptures. But I have something like 20 other posts quoting me that I must address first.

Shabbat shalom.
 
Upvote 0

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
I linked scripture that provides the exact opposite idea as truth. It's not in scripture because it's not scriptural. I'm not trying to be so harsh, but it's absolutely unscriptural.
Devin, reasoning skills are not taught in Scripture, but they are of God. Asserting that something is a default interpretation is an appeal to reason.

This has gone on so long, that I don't even remember the original point that I was saying was the default interpretation.
 
Upvote 0

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
You should go by the name B'nei Yisrael. You are, but not all of Israel is found yet. A lot of us are still dispersed, and a lot aren't even aware of this mystery just yet.
"Israel" is simply short for "b'nei Israel." This is why we use the term Israel and Jewish People interchangably.
 
Upvote 0

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
Does the Catholic Church Teach Replacement Theology?.

"Grafted into the Root of Jesse" does not imply that Jews are now chopped liver in Catholic theology.
It does lead to an understanding of how the promise of Abraham is fulfilled through Christians.
This is not a place to discuss the theologies of other churches. I do discuss such issues in General Theology and elsewhere on CF. However, since the SOP states that Messianic Jews who exist in the churches may not use the forum to argue for their Church's doctrine, I cannot fully reply to you here (which is exactly why this forum isn't a good place for such threads). I'll just say a few things that are permitted, and then if you want to pick it up in more detail, we can open a thread in General Theology.

In the past, because the Church has not officially clarified its teachings on Israel and her relationship to the Church, Replacement Theology was not excluded. So although it was never the official teaching of the Church, it did become trendy during certain periods.

However, with Vatican 2 and the document Nostrae Aetate, the Church has OFFICIALLY assumed a position that makes Replacement Theology utterly untenable. Please see the quotes in my signature.

We Hebrew Catholics follow very closely the dominos falling from Nostrae Aetate. It is, of course, hard not to be impatient. But it is truly amazing what has been happening in the Church as more and more, she begins to realize the full significance of Nostra Aetate with regards to how the Church thinks of Israel, as well as of herself.

I am currently reading an excellent book by Messianic Jewish Rabbi Mark Kinzer on the significance of Nostra Aetate, and what it will mean for Jewish Catholic relations, as well as for the relationship between Messianic Jews and the Church. All extremely wonderful things! I consider Mark Kinzer to be THE foremost thinker today in the Messianic Jewish World. The book is called, "Searching Her Own Mystery; Nostra Aetate, the Jewish People, and the identity of the Church."

https://www.amazon.com/Searching-Her-Own-Mystery-Identity/dp/1498203310
 
Upvote 0

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
Who is Israel? The children of the promise to Abraham,
beginning with the blood and continuing on to all who
follow and serve Yahweh.
Do you consider non-believing Jews to be part of Israel?
 
Upvote 0

pat34lee

Messianic
Sep 13, 2011
11,293
2,637
59
Florida, USA
✟89,330.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Do you consider non-believing Jews to be part of Israel?

They are part of the bloodline. Until they come to believe
in Yeshua, they are not part of the body. Some people
believe that they get some dispensation for believing that
the Messiah is still coming. I don't see it individually, but
as a nation, I think they do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devin P
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

pat34lee

Messianic
Sep 13, 2011
11,293
2,637
59
Florida, USA
✟89,330.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Please provide a verse that states that we must be part of Israel to achieve salvation.

I just wanted to chime in on this one point.
The question is like those saying we follow the
law in order to be saved. That is putting the cart
before the horse in both cases.

Once we are saved, we are made part of Israel.
And following the law is a consequence of those
who learn the law after salvation, just as the fruits
of the spirit are consequences. Lack of these means
either stunted growth or questionable salvation in
the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devin P
Upvote 0

Devin P

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2017
1,280
631
31
Michigan
✟99,110.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Please provide a verse that states that we must be part of Israel to achieve salvation.

This will probably come up a lot, so let me introduce one of my concepts now, and try to do so clearly. There is a difference between Israel and the Commonwealth of Israel. Israel is the tribes and converts. The Commonwealth includes (OT) those Gentiles who came to sojourn in the Land but who did not convert and (NT) those Gentiles grafted on, worshiping the God of Israel even if they don't become Jews.
It's everywhere. Jesus Himself said that He only came but unto the lost sheep of the House of Israel. So, Jesus literally says that He only came for them. People try to say that this was because He only talked to Jews when He was on earth and during His ministry, but that isn't so. He talked about Him being the savior to a gentile woman, a Sumerian by a well, and there's another gentile He preached to, that escapes me at the moment, but He did talk to both Jews and Gentiles. He just primarily talked to Jews.

That, and no. Commonwealth, means nation. So when it says we become part of the commonwealth of Israel, it means we become part of the nation of Israel.

Let me put it another way. If you don't do it, is it a sin? You see, when I say a person doesn't HAVE to refrain from pork (don't misinterpret this as being anti-torah please) that it is not a sin. So for example, Messianics who take up observing the Torah do so out of love for God, not because they are trying to avoid sin. It means that those in the Christian churches, who don't observe Shabbat or avoid treif meat, are not sinning. As believers, we are obligated to avoid sin. We don't "get to" sin even though it's wrong.
You're teaching people to sin by that logic though. Sin, is only described as the transgression of the law. Yeshua tells us to "go and sin no more", but all sin is ever described as, is one of two things:
1. Disobeying a command directly from the mouth of God.
2. More commonly, disobeying the Torah.

When you tell people that they don't have to refrain from eating pork, you're teaching them it's okay to eat something, and do something that our Father directly calls an abomination. Things that prophetically, when speaking of the end times, He said those that do that, will burn.

I'm not saying we "get to" sin. I'm saying that I'm not keeping Torah for salvation. I'm doing it because I am saved. You asked me why I felt I had to keep Torah. I said I don't have to, I get to. It's a privilege to have had the scales removed from my eyes allowing me to see this.
Ah, I suspected we had a potential for misuderstanding here. There was something about the way you said punishment that clued me in that you meant something different.

The covenant with Israel at Sinai was basically, Obey my commandments and you get to live in the promised land. Therefore the punishment for Israel not keeping the commandments was that we would get kicked out of the Land.

There is no where that it is written that if Israel doesn't obey the commandments that God will abandon her. Indeed, if you read the prophets, you'll find that even though God gets angry with Israel, even cries out "I divorce you!", that his love is deeper and he never abandons her, if you read all the way to the end. In fact, there is an entire book, Hosea, devoted to this very issue. The essence of Hosea is that just as Hosea is faithful to his wife despite her prostitution, so God will be faithful to Israel despite her unfaithfulness.
The purpose of the covenant was the same as it is now. If they kept it, they stayed in the land. When they were kicked out of the land, if they went back to keeping it, they'd be brought back. But, after so much adultery (spiritually) He divorced them, and put them away. Not until Yeshua came could they then come back, because as the law of the adulterous bride states, the only way for an adulterous bride that was put away can be freed from that law, is if her husband dies. Therefore, Yeshua, יהוה, had to die for us, to free us from that law in which we were kept from Him.

By keeping that covenant again, since Yeshua renewed it, we will again be brought back into the promised land. But, only His people keep that covenant, so by keeping it, we prove we belong to the Father. Do we have to keep all of them? I mean, I suppose not. Yeshua says that those who do and teach all of the commandments, will be called great. Those that do away with the least and teach others to do the same will be called least. So, they'll probably still be able to get in. Definitely not if they do away with the whole law though. Because it doesn't say if they do away with all of it, and teach others to do the same. It says if they teach anyone to do away with the least of them. Not all, the very least of them. If we rejoice in freedom from the law, and the ability to live in disobedience, I don't really think such a person would be saved, because they'd be delighting in disobedience to our Father. We probably would have to agree to disagree here haha.
The Lord does cut Israel off from being the his oracle of the gospel due to their disbelief--a disbelief caused by God until the fullness of the Gentiles is come in. But not being God's oracle doesn't mean that he doesn't keep his covenant with them, or that they are not still elect despite their unbelief. As Paul writes about unbelieving Jews in Romans 11:28-29, "As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, for God's gifts and his call are irrevocable."
I'm not saying that they are removed from His covenant.


You need to read what you yourself wrote, so that you can see its many self-contradictions. You say no one is being replaced, but then you turn around and describe who is being replaced: disbelieving Israel (let's face it, we of the remnant are extremely few). You say you are not stripping Israel of it's election, but you believe that unbelieving Jews are NOT chosen in fact. You are, without being conscious of it I believe, talking out of both sides of your mouth.

Here is the reality of what I see happening in the Two House movement. It begins with the wrongheaded notion that only Israel is saved, and then gets forced into creating a way that Gentile believers in Messiah can be Israel (which is more specific than the Commonwealth of Israel, which they really are a part of). Once Israel envy sets in, the Scriptures get distorted. It procedes to make two errors:
1. It strips the People of Israel (the vast majority of who are not believers) of our election as God's chosen people. It declares it no longer truly Israel.
2. It creates a new Israel: those who believe in Yeshua and keep the commandments.

This sir, SCREAMS Replacement Theology. You can say, "We aren't replacing you," all you want, but if you accept those two assertions above, you have adopted an extreme form of Replacement Theology.

Just to let you know, Replacement theology is my big "thing." I hate it, because it has led to the persecution and death of millions of Jews. It is the fertile ground upon which anti-Semitism grows. It is a heretical doctrine that is a threat to the People of Israel. So you may notice me getting more emotional when we talk about it. It's not you personally. It's the issue.
The gospel, isn't just Yeshua. The gospel, is that those that were dispersed, that those that were scattered, can come into the commonwealth of Israel by keeping the Torah. Faith is a given. No one will want to keep Torah aside from faith, unless they've been brought up as part of Israel, and then try to keep it by self-righteousness. But, no outsider will want to keep it without faith.

Romans 11:20-23
20 Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:
Here we see that, they were broken off by unbelief. The root, is Yeshua. Period. But, if one doesn't have faith in Yeshua, they cannot be saved. We stand now, by faith. Does this mean that all of Judah that doesn't believe isn't saved? If they think that their own keeping of the Torah, alone, is what saves them, then no they aren't saved. This isn't replacement theology, this is quite literally what God says. If we have faith in our own justification, by our own hands, we aren't justified in His eyes. Only by faith.

21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.
22 Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.

21-22, shows that unless one continues in His goodness (having faith in Him for our justification), then we are to be grafted out of the good olive tree (Israel).

23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be grafted in: for God is able to graft them in again.

Here it shows that they were grafted out (not all of Israel, just the unbelieving portion of it), but because of a belief in themselves, and not in Yeshua. If they then believe, they will be grafted back in. It's not a replacement, because not all of Israel was grafted out. Only the ones that don't believe in the Savior. Only the ones that place more faith in the tradition of man, than in the word of God.
It's quite literally what God Himself says. This is all throughout the Torah. They were keeping Torah decently, but would complain and gripe about not having certain things. Not having meat, not having water, etc. And because it shows a lack of faith, God punished those that didn't have faith.

Hebrew 11:6 - But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.


Numbers 20:12 - And the LORD spake unto Moses and Aaron, Because ye believed me not, to sanctify me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore ye shall not bring this congregation into the land which I have given them.

No man can be justified aside from faith, and without justification, we cannot stand before our Father. Will there be those of natural Israel that will not be saved? Yes, if they don't have faith. But God, nor I, want that. I want everyone to see the truth, and to place their faith in Yeshua, and not in themselves, and all of Israel is supposed to in the end days after the fulness of the Gentiles comes in, because they will then see where they strayed and change their ways and turn back to יהוה.

I never said that they get replaced, but if anyone. Natural or grafted, lacks faith, they will be removed, otherwise God isn't consistent with His own word.

I apologize if it sounded as if I was meaning Gentiles would replace Natural Borns, but that's not what I mean. I mean that if one born into Israel, rejects the truth for tradition, even until the end, they will not be saved. God desires strongly against this though. The Pharisees, they were of Judah, yet, they were called children of the devil, because their faith was in the traditions and doctrines of men. So, if the fulness comes in, and a man from Judah still rejects the gospel, still rejects the truth, I don't think that they would be saved based on scripture, but again, God strongly desires against this.


Don't even worry about it, my friend. Like I said, it's my fault -- I realize that my blunt style in the forum, especially when you can't see my face or hear my voice, can sometimes be interpreted as being hostile. That's why I figured, since we were going to get into theology pretty deeply, it would be a good idea for me to tell you what my actual attitude was. :) :) :)


If you spent quality time around religious Jews, you would find out for yourself that they do indeed have faith in God, not themselves. In fact, given this sort of anti-Jewish statement that shows such a grave misunderstanding, I suggest you do exactly that: contact the Rabbi of a local synagogue and tell him that you would like to learn more about Jews and Judaism and would like to attend prayers and maybe some Torah Studies. Just a suggestion.
All I'm saying, is if they believe in Talmud, their faith is not in Yeshua. It's in themselves and the traditions and doctrines of their fathers. If they reject Talmud, if they reject the extra laws passed down by the Rabbis, then yes, their faith is in Yeshua, and not man. If I were to find a sect of Judaism that kept strictly to Torah, and allowed outsiders to become Israel by keeping Torah and eventually out of faith, getting physically circumcised, then yes. I'd definitely seek them out, but apart from that, unless it was to spread this gospel, or to develop an apologetic it'd just be a headache. Unless they believe in the Tanakh, and the Brit, a lot of what they're saying I wouldn't agree with, as my beliefs don't match theirs in the slightest. It would be cool to hear some of the extra teachings that they could offer, especially since they have been reading only the Tanakh, and have so much knowledge of it, and probably understand in more depth the connections that are inside. So, it'd definitely be cool to pick their brain about some things though.
I notice you do admit in this quote of you that there ARE those getting replaced (the overwhelming vast majority of the known People of Israel, the Jews). You simply excuse doing so by saying, "well, but they're not saved."




This is no fault of their own. It is God himself who places a veil over their eyes, for the sake of the fullness of the Gentiles coming in. Do you think that the Lord will punish them for something which is not their own fault? Consider that Paul says of unbelieving Jews, "and so all Israel shall be saved." Romans 11:26

Shabbat shalom, my friend.
Absolutely. I'm not saying it's their fault. I was only able to believe in Yeshua because of the gift of faith that He gave me. But, the high priest Caiaphas, knew who Yeshua was, and still wanted Him put to death, because Yeshua would've put an end to their reign of authority. He would've put an end to what they had built, to their interpretation. If one of natural born Israel still rejects who Yeshua is, and picks tradition over truth, they will not be saved. But, as I said earlier, God greatly desires against this. So if it happens at all, I don't think it would be a majority. If it does happen that some aren't saved, it'd be a very small minority. But mostly, we'll just be grafted into Israel along side (both natural blood, and grafted) Judah. Our older brother, harmoniously.
 
Upvote 0

Devin P

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2017
1,280
631
31
Michigan
✟99,110.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I just deleted 2/3 of this post. :sigh: Give me a minute to go back and get the earlier verses again.

1 Peter 1:1 - Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,

There is dispute over whom Peter actually wrote to, whether he was writing to Jewish believers within those churches, or whether he was writing to the Gentiles there, who made up the majority.

As I have not studied this personally, and don't really have an opinion, it's better that I simply not comment on its actual meaning.

Your interpretation if I understand it, is that this verse indicates Peter is writing to Israel in dispersion, but the Churches were Gentile, so it would lead one to conclude that the Gentile Believers were considered a part of Israel. Not bad -- I'll give you some credit for this one. But it's weak. It's weak because we don't have a consensus about what the verse means. And it's weak because, AGAIN, it simply doesn't state that Gentile believers are Israel--you can only infer it, if at all.

My own way of dealing with this verse is that I simply say, "Well, what does the length and breadth of the rest of Scripture say? What can shine light on this?" And the rest of the New Testament makes it clear that there are Jews and Greek, Israel and the Nations. It makes it clear (Acts 15) that Gentiles do not need to be circumcised and keep the commandments.
Acts 15, is dealing with new gentiles coming into the faith. Gentiles did all of those things, and in order to fellowship in a synagogue, you cannot do any of those things, because Torah directly says that one who does these things should be cut off. Basically, all acts 15 is doing, is saying what a gentile must rid themselves of before they continue growing in the faith, because the very next verse talks about how they can learn the rest of Torah each sabbath day from pretty much any synagogue.

Hosea, talks about how God will make for Himself a people, out of those which were not His people. Gentiles are the only ones that aren't His people, as gentile simply means out of covenant. Peter in 1 Peter, then quotes from Hosea, to refer to this. He calls the target of 1 Peter, babes. Meaning they are babies in Yeshua. Yeshua is the word/Torah, so it's referring to those that have just come into this truth, and have accepted it, and now are learning to develop and live out this new found identity. Basically all that 1 Peter is about, is talking to the 12 dispersed tribes, and getting them to understand how to dwell in harmony with the gentiles of the land they're living in, because gentiles historically, especially at this time, dislike Jews, and anything that looks jewish.

Matthew 15:24 - But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

This verse comes up in here a lot. There is disagreement over whom the "lost sheep" are. I've written entire long posts giving my view and documenting it. I'll try to give you the short version, since this post is growing ever longer.

This verse cannot be referring to the house of Israel aka the 10 tribes who are dispersed among the nations, because during his life, Yeshua never went out to them. He stayed within the Land. Indeed, you can count on one hand the number of encounters Jesus had with Gentiles that are recorded in the gospels. So who DID Jesus reach out to in the years he was here on this planet? Sinful Jews -- prostitutes, tax collectors, etc. This leads me to conclude that the "Israel" in the verse is the larger Israel, the People of Israel, and that those sheep who are lost are sinful Jews.

You're right. He didn't go out to them in large numbers, but He raised disciples that He then sent out to them. If he had went out to them, He wouldn't of trained His disciples. At this time, they still had a man-made law, stating that gentiles and jews couldn't be together. You couldn't stay in a gentiles home, nor a gentile in yours. You couldn't eat with them, and you couldn't befriend them. They were common and unclean, which then in Acts 10 this was disproven, but regardless, this is why Yeshua didn't go out to them. He was to remain with His disciples, teaching them, and cleansing them of the doctrines of man until His crucifixion.

He did however, talk to some of them, as I mentioned, the woman by the well. The Sumerian woman who was a gentile, by the well. He told her who she was, and talked about the gospel to her.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: pat34lee
Upvote 0

Devin P

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2017
1,280
631
31
Michigan
✟99,110.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hosea 2:23 - And I will sow her unto me in the earth; and I will have mercy upon her that had not obtained mercy; and I will say to them which were not my people, Thou artmy people; and they shall say, Thou art my God.


In the Old Testament, only the People of Israel were His People. That is no longer true. There are those of the Nations, aka Gentiles, who are called his people because they believe in Messiah. In essence, God now has TWO peoples which are his: the Children of Israel, and Ekklesia, the Church.

Every time the NT speaks of Israel and the Nations, every time it mentions "Jews and Greeks" in the Church, it supports my point. Every time it mentions Gentile believers, it supports my point. I will try to compose a post for you with scriptures. But I have something like 20 other posts quoting me that I must address first.

Shabbat shalom.
This simply isn't scriptural though. There is not gate for the church. Where in the scriptures does it say that His chosen are Israel, and the church? Only Israel are His children. That's it. By believing in Him, and desiring to keep Torah you become part of Israel. You are grafted in. Sheep, His children, His people, all of these terms, and many more, in the OT were only ever used to describe Israel. The NT doesn't redefine these terms, it references them. Each time the NT uses one of these terms, it's referencing them, not redefining them.

If we are children of יהוה, we are Israel. There are only 12 gates into the city, there is no 13th gate for the church. By having faith in Yeshua, we are grafted into the good olive tree. That olive tree, is Israel. Otherwise, we wouldn't be grafted in to the good olive tree, considering it's talking about Israel. There'd be two olive trees both with the root of them being Yeshua. But there is one. And this one stood long ago as shown in Romans 11, with Yeshua being the root of it, always.

This is why Paul kept the Feast days while being with Gentiles, and not Jews. He was showing them how to be, and how to live. All throughout the NT they are keeping the feasts, and keeping the laws. Whether they are with Jews, or whether they are with Gentiles. It refers to them in 1 Peter 1:1, and James 1:1, as being of the tribes, because I'm guessing by this time, the gospel had already been made known to them to such an extent, that they understood their identity at this point in time, and that they were no longer gentiles (e.g. out of covenant) but were brought back into covenant by the death, burial and resurrection of Yeshua - aka, the "good news".
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
That, and no. Commonwealth, means nation. So when it says we become part of the commonwealth of Israel, it means we become part of the nation of Israel.
Yes and no. When Israel entered the Land, it had the boundaries of a Nation. Gentiles would come and dwell within those boundaries. But they were not part of the Tribal People. Sojourners in the Land. (Not to be confused with those who came and drew near to the LORD, meaning, became part of Israel.)

In the same respect in the NT, You have those who have come NEAR to Israel, drawn within its spiritual territory, but are not part of the Tribal People. These Gentile believers in Yeshua are part of the commonwealth of Israel.
 
Upvote 0

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
They are part of the bloodline. Until they come to believe
in Yeshua, they are not part of the body. Some people
believe that they get some dispensation for believing that
the Messiah is still coming. I don't see it individually, but
as a nation, I think they do.
I didn't ask you if unbelieving Jews were part of the body/ekklesia. I assume we both agree they are not. I asked you if they are part of Israel. It would help if you would say yes or no, rather than try to word things differently.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

danny ski

Newbie
Jan 13, 2013
1,867
506
✟34,912.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Private
It's everywhere. Jesus Himself said that He only came but unto the lost sheep of the House of Israel. So, Jesus literally says that He only came for them. People try to say that this was because He only talked to Jews when He was on earth and during His ministry, but that isn't so. He talked about Him being the savior to a gentile woman, a Sumerian by a well, and there's another gentile He preached to, that escapes me at the moment, but He did talk to both Jews and Gentiles. He just primarily talked to Jews.

That, and no. Commonwealth, means nation. So when it says we become part of the commonwealth of Israel, it means we become part of the nation of Israel.


You're teaching people to sin by that logic though. Sin, is only described as the transgression of the law. Yeshua tells us to "go and sin no more", but all sin is ever described as, is one of two things:
1. Disobeying a command directly from the mouth of God.
2. More commonly, disobeying the Torah.

When you tell people that they don't have to refrain from eating pork, you're teaching them it's okay to eat something, and do something that our Father directly calls an abomination. Things that prophetically, when speaking of the end times, He said those that do that, will burn.

I'm not saying we "get to" sin. I'm saying that I'm not keeping Torah for salvation. I'm doing it because I am saved. You asked me why I felt I had to keep Torah. I said I don't have to, I get to. It's a privilege to have had the scales removed from my eyes allowing me to see this.

The purpose of the covenant was the same as it is now. If they kept it, they stayed in the land. When they were kicked out of the land, if they went back to keeping it, they'd be brought back. But, after so much adultery (spiritually) He divorced them, and put them away. Not until Yeshua came could they then come back, because as the law of the adulterous bride states, the only way for an adulterous bride that was put away can be freed from that law, is if her husband dies. Therefore, Yeshua, יהוה, had to die for us, to free us from that law in which we were kept from Him.

By keeping that covenant again, since Yeshua renewed it, we will again be brought back into the promised land. But, only His people keep that covenant, so by keeping it, we prove we belong to the Father. Do we have to keep all of them? I mean, I suppose not. Yeshua says that those who do and teach all of the commandments, will be called great. Those that do away with the least and teach others to do the same will be called least. So, they'll probably still be able to get in. Definitely not if they do away with the whole law though. Because it doesn't say if they do away with all of it, and teach others to do the same. It says if they teach anyone to do away with the least of them. Not all, the very least of them. If we rejoice in freedom from the law, and the ability to live in disobedience, I don't really think such a person would be saved, because they'd be delighting in disobedience to our Father. We probably would have to agree to disagree here haha.

I'm not saying that they are removed from His covenant.



The gospel, isn't just Yeshua. The gospel, is that those that were dispersed, that those that were scattered, can come into the commonwealth of Israel by keeping the Torah. Faith is a given. No one will want to keep Torah aside from faith, unless they've been brought up as part of Israel, and then try to keep it by self-righteousness. But, no outsider will want to keep it without faith.

Romans 11:20-23
20 Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:
Here we see that, they were broken off by unbelief. The root, is Yeshua. Period. But, if one doesn't have faith in Yeshua, they cannot be saved. We stand now, by faith. Does this mean that all of Judah that doesn't believe isn't saved? If they think that their own keeping of the Torah, alone, is what saves them, then no they aren't saved. This isn't replacement theology, this is quite literally what God says. If we have faith in our own justification, by our own hands, we aren't justified in His eyes. Only by faith.

21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.
22 Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.

21-22, shows that unless one continues in His goodness (having faith in Him for our justification), then we are to be grafted out of the good olive tree (Israel).

23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be grafted in: for God is able to graft them in again.

Here it shows that they were grafted out (not all of Israel, just the unbelieving portion of it), but because of a belief in themselves, and not in Yeshua. If they then believe, they will be grafted back in. It's not a replacement, because not all of Israel was grafted out. Only the ones that don't believe in the Savior. Only the ones that place more faith in the tradition of man, than in the word of God.
It's quite literally what God Himself says. This is all throughout the Torah. They were keeping Torah decently, but would complain and gripe about not having certain things. Not having meat, not having water, etc. And because it shows a lack of faith, God punished those that didn't have faith.

Hebrew 11:6 - But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.


Numbers 20:12 - And the LORD spake unto Moses and Aaron, Because ye believed me not, to sanctify me in the eyes of the children of Israel, therefore ye shall not bring this congregation into the land which I have given them.

No man can be justified aside from faith, and without justification, we cannot stand before our Father. Will there be those of natural Israel that will not be saved? Yes, if they don't have faith. But God, nor I, want that. I want everyone to see the truth, and to place their faith in Yeshua, and not in themselves, and all of Israel is supposed to in the end days after the fulness of the Gentiles comes in, because they will then see where they strayed and change their ways and turn back to יהוה.

I never said that they get replaced, but if anyone. Natural or grafted, lacks faith, they will be removed, otherwise God isn't consistent with His own word.

I apologize if it sounded as if I was meaning Gentiles would replace Natural Borns, but that's not what I mean. I mean that if one born into Israel, rejects the truth for tradition, even until the end, they will not be saved. God desires strongly against this though. The Pharisees, they were of Judah, yet, they were called children of the devil, because their faith was in the traditions and doctrines of men. So, if the fulness comes in, and a man from Judah still rejects the gospel, still rejects the truth, I don't think that they would be saved based on scripture, but again, God strongly desires against this.



All I'm saying, is if they believe in Talmud, their faith is not in Yeshua. It's in themselves and the traditions and doctrines of their fathers. If they reject Talmud, if they reject the extra laws passed down by the Rabbis, then yes, their faith is in Yeshua, and not man. If I were to find a sect of Judaism that kept strictly to Torah, and allowed outsiders to become Israel by keeping Torah and eventually out of faith, getting physically circumcised, then yes. I'd definitely seek them out, but apart from that, unless it was to spread this gospel, or to develop an apologetic it'd just be a headache. Unless they believe in the Tanakh, and the Brit, a lot of what they're saying I wouldn't agree with, as my beliefs don't match theirs in the slightest. It would be cool to hear some of the extra teachings that they could offer, especially since they have been reading only the Tanakh, and have so much knowledge of it, and probably understand in more depth the connections that are inside. So, it'd definitely be cool to pick their brain about some things though.

Absolutely. I'm not saying it's their fault. I was only able to believe in Yeshua because of the gift of faith that He gave me. But, the high priest Caiaphas, knew who Yeshua was, and still wanted Him put to death, because Yeshua would've put an end to their reign of authority. He would've put an end to what they had built, to their interpretation. If one of natural born Israel still rejects who Yeshua is, and picks tradition over truth, they will not be saved. But, as I said earlier, God greatly desires against this. So if it happens at all, I don't think it would be a majority. If it does happen that some aren't saved, it'd be a very small minority. But mostly, we'll just be grafted into Israel along side (both natural blood, and grafted) Judah. Our older brother, harmoniously.
Do you know why I find the Chabadnics who believe that their dead Rabbi is a Messiah more credible than MJs? Because, wrong as they are, they put the Torah at the front and center and they are the guardians of our history, traditions, religious discourse, and learned opinions and verdicts. In other word, the Talmud. Without which, we'd be as confused as the MJ.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: chunkofcoal
Upvote 0