- Jan 13, 2009
- 32,459
- 7,737
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Single
Starting point as in a conversation starting point, not they started itSo they started it. I see. Convenient.
Upvote
0
Starting point as in a conversation starting point, not they started itSo they started it. I see. Convenient.
Hopefully the situation is resolved without anyone being hurt.How would you put it, then?
Does it seem logical to you to solve the problem by demonstrating that Westerners resort to exactly the same violent tactics...? What need is there for assimilation if the locals are committing the same crimes in droves?
Who says the Swedes want to assimilate with refugees?
I never said I agree with what they're doing regarding violence. However, their reaction is 100% understandable in light of what they're dealing with. This entire thread is telling about the OP and what he chooses to post about on a regular basis though.Does it seem logical to you to solve the problem by demonstrating that Westerners resort to exactly the same violent tactics...? What need is there for assimilation if the locals are committing the same crimes in droves?
Criticising masked vigilantes assaulting children = "supporting Islam" now? Sure, OK.
I never said I agree with what they're doing regarding violence. However, their reaction is 100% understandable in light of what they're dealing with. This entire thread is telling about the OP and what he chooses to post about on a regular basis though.
ETA: Some people around here support Islam all the time no matter what.
Their reaction is violence, which u find 100℅ understandable. Hmm...I never said I agree with what they're doing regarding violence. However, their reaction is 100% understandable in light of what they're dealing with. This entire thread is telling about the OP and what he chooses to post about on a regular basis though.
ETA: Some people around here support Islam all the time no matter what.
Uh, no, it's not understandable in the least bit. Maybe in the Middle Ages. Modern first world nations, however, have civil rights for a reason.I never said I agree with what they're doing regarding violence. However, their reaction is 100% understandable in light of what they're dealing with.
You and I both know what I'm really talking about.Criticising masked vigilantes assaulting children = "supporting Islam" now? Sure, OK.
You and I both know what I'm really talking about.
You and I both know what I'm really talking about.
If you're not talking about the OP how am I meant to have the faintest idea what you're talking about?You and I both know what I'm really talking about.
"and letting foreigners do whatever without consequence "? And even if they were, that justifies attacking children, many of whom presumably are Swedish born?I don't believe for a second those of you claiming to not understand the motivations behind the retaliatory actions of people fed up with a government not sticking up for its own people and letting foreigners do whatever without consequence are genuine. One can absolutely not condone the actions yet understand them.
I can't consider some of you to truly be serious, especially when your understanding is applied to those that incite the reaction via their actions.
But suggest racism or even, dare I say it, the dreaded "white privilege" and watch the spittle fly!I cannot begin to understand why a group would walk around town finding people with dark skin and beating them up. Perhaps you could explain it to me?
'White privilege' doesn't exist in Sweden.But suggest racism or even, dare I say it, the dreaded "white privilege" and watch the spittle fly!