Because it is none of your business. If you don't want to discuss the topic, please move along.So you don't have an answer as to how God has blessed you today?
Upvote
0
Because it is none of your business. If you don't want to discuss the topic, please move along.So you don't have an answer as to how God has blessed you today?
No, you can destory a town and not put the PEOPLE in the fire.In a pinch, offering the bodies and property of nonbelievers as burnt offerings is also an acceptable human sacrifice.
"Suppose you hear in one of the towns the LORD your God is giving you that some worthless rabble among you have led their fellow citizens astray by encouraging them to worship foreign gods. In such cases, you must examine the facts carefully. If you find it is true and can prove that such a detestable act has occurred among you, you must attack that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his fierce anger and be merciful to you. He will have compassion on you and make you a great nation, just as he solemnly promised your ancestors. "The LORD your God will be merciful only if you obey him and keep all the commands I am giving you today, doing what is pleasing to him." (Deuteronomy 13:13-19 NLT)
How so I can about PROMISE you that within the course of a week at LEAST one person from every major group shoots or otherwise purposely kill someone.Well that would mean so do atheists and other non Christians. But his premise was false.
I agree that either the Old Testament or Koran can be spun that way. But not the New Testament.So... given that there are any number of serious Muslim scholars who say similar things about the Koran, i.e. it doesn't command violence, but it could be spun that way, why not believe them?
You're joking right. Our secular armed forces go to war in the name of Jesus? I can't stop laughing.Considering American forces are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children in Iraq, and the American forces leadership was fundamental Christian, and the armed forces were majority Christian, I would say Christian "terrorists" have done far more killing than Muslim "terrorists".
LOL, I accept your surrender.
If you get the courage, which of these simple premises do you disagree with:
That GWBush isn't a fundamental Christian?
That the majority of the American armed forces is Christian?
That the USA invaded Iraq?
That the invasion was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children?
You stated you are no longer Christian. You gave the reason for such because you read the Bible.
Why does someone claiming apostasy like to hang out at a Christian forum. I'm truly curious.
"The one who has stolen what was set apart for destruction will himself be burned with fire, along with everything he has, for he has broken the covenant of the LORD and has done a horrible thing in Israel." (Joshua 7:15 NLT)No, you can destory a town and not put the PEOPLE in the fire.
I cannot wrap my head around this no matter how I try. There had to have been a better way to demonstrate what those bombs could do. I especially don't understand the second bomb so closely following the first.Nuclear weapons are just terrible. One hopes they will never be used again.
I understand Truman's reasoning. Tough decision.
Because public prophecy closed with the coming of Jesus.How could you possibly know this to be the case?
Are Christians incapable of shooting people?Well that would mean so do atheists and other non Christians. But his premise was false.
Says who? Do you believe the book of Revelations?Because public prophecy closed with the coming of Jesus.
How much further backwards will you bend to excuse and defend Fascism? Drop the weak excuses and flimsy justifications and just say what you mean.Yes, Trump made those remarks but in the form of a conditional. If mosques are identified as doing bad things, then they will absolutely have to be closed. (If X, then Y.)So it is possible no mosques would be closed according to Trump.
I'd need more information as to what constitutes as bad things" to begin contemplating Armoured's alleged "double standard."
What I can say is at this moment, Armoured's alleged "double standard" is baseless and contingent upon two scenarios being parallel but they are not analogous.
You're joking right. Our secular armed forces go to war in the name of Jesus? I can't stop laughing.
Get on topic and stop harassing your fellow posters with your pretend piousness.I asked in the spirit of Christ. That you are hostile is an answer in itself.
I will hold you and your hostile nature in prayer that Christ relieve you of such pain. I understand now why you seek to deliver that unto others. Because the burden is apparently overmuch to bear.
I think you only read what you wanted to read.
The underlying premise is the following:
The Quran encourages, and even commands killing infidels.
The Teachings of Christ does not.
A Christian extremist is defined in the life of Mother Theresa. She loved the poor and sick and decided it was better to feed them and clothe them then encourage them to strap on explosives in the name of Allah.
That pretty much sums up the thread thus far.
According to many Christians, our society is based on Christian values.
As well, the man who ultimately declared war is a fundamental Christian, and said that God told him to invade. I would say the boundary between religion and state got awfully blurry in this case.
How much further backwards will you bend to excuse and defend Fascism? Drop the weak excuses and flimsy justifications and just say what you mean.
You would continue to defend him even if he suggested we set up concentration camps.I did say what I meant. Furthermore, I didn't offer any "backwards...excuse" or "defend Fascism" Trump never stated he would close mosques and neither did Trump advocate any mosques be closed.
Quite simply, if you construed Trumps comment as calling for the closure of a mosque or mosques, then you misunderstood what exactly he said. Stop misconstruing Trump's remarks for the purpose of substantiating your assertion. The fact is, you made a baseless assertion and at this very moment is still a baseless assertion.
Come man, argue the facts, not what you want the facts to be, or adjust your erroneous claims to conform to the facts. Or are we just to play along in your tale of fiction?
Under Moses' Law a man who was sexually involved with his father's wife would be put to death. Old Covenant.You're saying the Bible doesn't punish homosexuality with death?
Donald Trump's Plan for a Muslim Database Draws Comparison to Nazi GermanyThe OP is a canard it itself. 1. There is no indication this guy was a Christian. He could easily be a Muslim. Buddhist, or Atheist. And even if you get past that, no one has been calling for Mosques to be closed down and Muslims registered.