Here is the origin of the doctrine you are promoting.
Genesis of Dispensational Theology (on YouTube)
.
Oh goodie, another class in session.
Here is the origin of the doctrine you are promoting.
Upvote
0
Here is the origin of the doctrine you are promoting.
Genesis of Dispensational Theology (on YouTube)
.
"Jesus took His kingdom away from the jews at the end of Daniels 69th week. But the Jews will have a chance to get it back during the 70th week."
True ... a remnant part of Israel will turn and believe during the coming time of Jacob's trouble .... all of the believing will have the kingdom restored to them [Acts 1:6-7]
And these saved mortals will enter and populate the Lord's coming millennial kingdom [Isaiah 11; 27:12-13; Jeremiah 30; Ezekiel 36; 39; 40-48; Joel 2; 3; Micah 4:1-3; 36; 5; Zechariah 12; 13:8-9; 14; Matthew 24:29-31; Luke 21:20-36; Romans 11:25-36]
Do you mean that modern Jews, who have rejected Christ, have another way of salvation?
How do you think your statement above compares to the words of the Apostle Paul below?
Already done, SS, as sure as 70 follows 69.Not already done BAB
Yeah, all we poor souls have is Holy Writ to base our understanding on. <Sniff>You do not understand the 70 weeks of years decreed for Israel
Just cast the Bible aside and accept what y'all claim it really means, right?.... denying this truth is one of your greatest errors
But wait, doesn't your New Religion teach that they won't have to believe in our Lord Christ? After all, the Church is for this "dispensation" only, and then we're all going back to slaughtering livestock for our sins, aren't we? Say so right there in Ezekiel!The way is the same, no different.... your problem is you refuse to believe that the time is coming when a remnant part of the nation will turn and believe in their Messiah and King
I don;t know about any of those goomers. All I know is that DF doctrine: A) contradicts the Bible, and B) contradicts history. That is sufficient; no need to know what set of dingbats invented it.You have read far too many pied pipers of preteristic replacement theology who must eliminate what they label as "Darby/MacDonnald dispensationalism"[a totally concocted hoax] .... this must be done in order to prove out their "antisemitic" rant
Unfortunately for those who hold to dispensational futurism, the Lord's Word is simply something you have to circumvent to get your hand-wrought doctrine to work. Witness the DF refusal to acknowledge that the letter to the Hebrews even exists.Those who have done and do this thing cannot usurp the Lord's word on the matter
Best if you'd lead by example.Better off for you to study the Word son
KInda like all that stuff the writer of Hebrews had to say, huh? Purely irrelevant. To DF doctrine, anyway. Just like the rest of the Bible.True .... none of what you say is relevant ..... or possible
You are wrong about that Straight. Their kind have killed Jews before. It is my great fear they will do so again before the Lord returns. There is great hatred there. Inexplicable hatred.
You are wrong about that Straight. Their kind have killed Jews before. It is my great fear they will do so again before the Lord returns. There is great hatred there. Inexplicable hatred.
I have had Jewish Christians in my home for Bible study.
It was not because I hated them.
Is it hatred to tell the modern Jews that they need Jesus Christ for salvation and that the Old Covenant system is finished?
Or would they be better off if we all just pretend that the Old Covenant system is still in effect, as John Hagee does?
Or would they be better off if we say, "The day is coming when the Jews will accept Jesus, but we do not know when." ? What about all of those older Jews who die without Jesus?
If we truly love them, they need to hear the painful truth.
The Jews stoned Stephen because he told them the truth they did not want to hear about their true Messiah.
Speaking the truth in love, is not hatred.
.
Hmmm...Paul talked about his people which were Jews. Ya they r still the chosen. They have been used as an example. Gentiles r grafted in and receive the benefits, but they r considered the chosen. The nation of the old testament who the laws were given to. I keep it simple and go by that. I don't believe Christians have replaced them