Should Ministers get paid???

Status
Not open for further replies.

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
39,283
20,281
US
✟1,476,566.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No church today is as big as the church in Corinth, The church in Ephesus, the church in Philippi and none of them had paid ministers.

I'm pretty sure there are some megachurches today that are larger than those churches. However, I'd also dispute that they did not compensate their full-time workers up to an acceptable standard of living.

Notice, I said "compensate."

When I was active duty military, we had what was called a "total compensation package." If you Google for the actual basic pay rates, you see that pay rates are relatively low--particularly for the level of responsibility and expected personal sacrifice many people in the military have.

But the base pay is actually only half or less of the "total military compensation." The military keeps troops, as I always called it, "cash poor and benefit rich."

If you look in full context at the specific circumstance of the treatment of widows in Paul's instruction, you see that widows who were working full time for the congregation would be those who were also on the widow's list for support to have all their needs met. There were no freebies.

I could argue that was overall the main case: Full-time workers were probably not earning any other income and were being "compensated" by the congregation to the extent that they had all their needs met.
 
Upvote 0

LoveofTruth

Christ builds His church from within us
Jun 29, 2015
6,385
1,750
✟167,289.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I don't believe any pastor in America today would preach 2 Corinthians 8:12-15 without heavily qualifying it. I've heard one radio preacher reading 2 Corinthians actually skip right over it. There is no way to honestly interpret that passage except as a redistribution of income.
and yet it still should be taught and lived. And its not "preached" so much, preaching is for the gospel workers generally. Not teaching or prophecy in the meetings to the saved. And it is not a "pastor:\:" that has to say everything, an apostle gift or prophet or evangelist or teacher could say this as well, and even any part of the body who Christ leads to minister in this way can speak these things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheMissingRib
Upvote 0

LoveofTruth

Christ builds His church from within us
Jun 29, 2015
6,385
1,750
✟167,289.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Except that it's clearly there in the New Testament. And history itself records the place and functioning of clergy from the earliest days forward.

no there is no clergy and laity as meaning a leader over others

"The word “clergy”, comes from the Greek word “kleros”, meaning “heritage, inhertitance or lot”, showing that believers are the inheritance, or heritage of God and it is used that way in scripture as we read ,

“ Neither as being lords over God’s heritage [Kleros], but being examples to the flock.” (1 Peter 5:3).

The word “laity” means comes from the word “laos”, meaning, “a people”, and it is used that way in scripture.

“And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people [laos].” ( 2 Corinthians 6:16)

There is no such thing as a clergy and latiy division. The “kleros:, and the “laity” both refer to the body of Christ. We are the inheritance of God and the people of God.
Again we see that mans traditions and order has caused a schism in the body.
 
Upvote 0

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
They met in homes because large structures were built for specific purposes.
In Rome, there are indications that early Christians met in other public spaces such as warehouses warehouseswww.christianitytoday.com/ch/asktheexpert/ask_churchbuildings.html
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
no there is no clergy and laity as meaning a leader over others
Oh yes there is.

"The word “clergy”, comes from the Greek word “kleros”, meaning “heritage, inhertitance or lot”, showing that believers are the inheritance, or heritage of God and it is used that way in scripture as we read
That may be where it comes from, but it doesn't explain what it means now or as used in scripture.

BTW, this is the Bridge Builders' forum for Moderate Christians. What bridges do you think your broadside against the conventional Christian churches is building and with whom?
 
Upvote 0

LoveofTruth

Christ builds His church from within us
Jun 29, 2015
6,385
1,750
✟167,289.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Oh yes there is.


That may be where it comes from, but it doesn't explain what it means now or as used in scripture.

BTW, this is the Bridge Builders' forum for Moderate Christians. What bridges do you think your broadside against the conventional Christian churches is building and with whom?


No show me in scripture and history where the modern clergy laity division came from. Jesus warned serverly against having authority and rule over others dominating them as the gentile rule was. This should not be like this in the church.

The history of how the high men exalted over all came into the church is a sad and dark history starting a bit earlier than 325 Ad with constantine but thats when it really took off.

and the bridges being built are bridges that lead back HOME, literally to gather in homes following the apostolic order from God and to allow Christ as the head to work in the body and for all to be free on any gathering to edify and minister to one another and to have a meal together and fellowship, pray and worship. The bridge is an escape from man made religion and Babylon. God tells his people to come out of her . And yes we would need a whole thread to discuss Babylon the Great Mother of harlots. But know this, that Gods people are in Her and he says for them to come out. The word the Great, seems to express the worldwide expanse of this confusing religious system.

and as far as my "broadside against the conventional religious systems. it is not a broadside. I come strait forward with truth, it is like a sharp two edged sword or a shaking from the word to let all things that can be shaken be shaken so that all we see is the glorious image of Christ

For far too long have exalted men taken from the believers and fed themselves often and bound believers up under their money laws and drawing men unto them. In their castles and huge cathedral structures they sit as Lords over the flock and they take such high titles, as reverend or master of Divinity, or his holiness etc.

This call is for a total reformation of the gathering of believers, I truly believe that Jesus stands out side knocking wanting to come into believers in the midst of them and sup with them and to participate with them. Ephesians 4:15,16

and i ask you as i have asked others

show me one verse that says ( or even remotely says) that there is one man over a entire church called the pastor, and that he gets a regular salary.

And I am not talking about history, or so called "church fathers", or traditions of men. Scripture, from the apostolic order in the NT is what I seek. I have many scriptures that say the opposite of a one man pastor gift over the whole church.

I want to see this one man ministry called The Pastor", in scripture over all and getting a salary. Specifically I speak of the man who dominates all christendom, not teachers evangelist apostles, prophets etc, but that Pastor role.


what I find amazing and I marvel at it. is how so many people when they see the clear scriptures i give and the biblical order and joy of body ministry under Christ headship and all care for one another, no one man getting paid over all. They argue and defend their tradition, often just simply denying scripture and the clear exhortations from it. How many think that they are rich and increased with goods and have need of NOTHING. If Jesus was knocking they would say, what were doing great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheMissingRib
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
39,283
20,281
US
✟1,476,566.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In Rome, there are indications that early Christians met in other public spaces such as warehouses warehouseswww.christianitytoday.com/ch/asktheexpert/ask_churchbuildings.html
Those were not "public" spaces, though, those were privately owned spaces where the owners--probably Christians--allowed it.
 
Upvote 0

LoveofTruth

Christ builds His church from within us
Jun 29, 2015
6,385
1,750
✟167,289.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
In Rome, there are indications that early Christians met in other public spaces such as warehouses warehouseswww.christianitytoday.com/ch/asktheexpert/ask_churchbuildings.html

no historically for church meetings ( not evangelism or other type of meetings) they met in homes, The first recorded alteration of a house to make more space was around 250 Ad or so. And they simply knocked out a wall in a living room of a house to make more room.

and the elders plural were in every church, not this one paid man called the pastor over all. This came later as well
 
Upvote 0

LoveofTruth

Christ builds His church from within us
Jun 29, 2015
6,385
1,750
✟167,289.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
often the difference from evangelistic meetings and church meetings in the home, are missed by many. It seems that when the revival evangelistic meetings took place and they used large halls for such meetings, that these places became the church and so the stress was on evangelism, not a church meeting with every member edifying eachother. We see the remnants of this at many places where the so called "altar call" is offered at the end of the meeting, showing it as an evangelistic meeting. I speak of a church meeting edifying itself under Christ headship and ministering their gifts to one another and having a meal etc.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
The history of how the high men exalted over all came into the church is a sad and dark history starting a bit earlier than 325 Ad with constantine but thats when it really took off.
What a joke. You had a long history of bishops stretching back to the apostles before Constantine. "Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church." Ignatius, 107 AD
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
39,283
20,281
US
✟1,476,566.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A warehouse certainly isn't a home, it's part of a business.
A business owned by businesspeople, and in this case, most likely Christian businesspeople.

Take Lydia in Philippi, for instance. Her business most likely required some amount of "warehouse" space, and that was most likely attached to her house.

But this--and your link--go to my point. Scripture does not command that Christians meet only in homes. What we see in scripture is that Christians met where they could--and that was at the time almost always a home because that's what was always available. But we also see instances of them meeting in other places, and there are certainly no directions to meet specifically in homes.
 
Upvote 0

Wordkeeper

Newbie
Oct 1, 2013
4,285
477
✟91,080.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The original church model is already being brought back:

https://www.cmaresources.org/index.php?q=node/168

Quote
What did it cost to start these 100,000 churches? Churches with no building or parking lot, no paid pastor or youth leader, no overhead projector? Totalling the costs for all the travel required, seminars, training, research projects, equipping of the few key people and multipliers, plus emergency welfare assistance, we arrive at no more than $30 million per year, or around $300 million over the past decade.


In comparison: traditional Christianity, with its countless programs, mountains of paper, training, permanent evangelistic events, church buildings and maintenance costs, salaries of church employees and budgets for welfare and mission, cost an incredible $286 billion per year, according to Dr. David Barrett, or $2,860 billion over the decade. $300 million is one ten thousandth of that sum! What would happen if Christians changed their giving habits over the next ten years, so that instead of 0.01%, 10% of Christian finances were invested in strategic multiplicative church planting movements? It would lead to a missionary explosion of incredible proportions. In order for that to happen, we believe that a 'financial salvation' or 'financial repentance' is necessary. We call it 'crucified giving'. The cross is not logical, uncrucified giving is: it demands hard facts, reasons to expect a return on investment, a business plan and visible, rapid results.
 
Upvote 0

As I was saying

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2015
1,258
200
82
Drouin, Victoria, Australia
✟2,608.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
If you look in full context at the specific circumstance of the treatment of widows in Paul's instruction, you see that widows who were working full time for the congregation would be those who were also on the widow's list for support to have all their needs met. There were no freebies.

I could argue that was overall the main case: Full-time workers were probably not earning any other income and were being "compensated" by the congregation to the extent that they had all their needs met.

All you have to do is produce the scriptures that say this. The only so called "full time" workers and I say this because the believers were all full time, as there was no such thing as a part time christian in those days. Because of persecution it was all or nothing. The only full time workers were the Apostles and the widows who spent their time praying for the church.

The people that were overseers of the church, the local Elders were not paid for the privilege. Not once does the scripture say that you employ a pastor from outside the church and pay him a salary to run it.

And in case you want to bring up the scripture that says Elders (not pastors) are worthy of double honour if they preach and teach as evidence for them being paid, forget it. The Greek word here for honour is the same Greek word use to "honour Jesus" so that would mean we have to pay Jesus.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

As I was saying

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2015
1,258
200
82
Drouin, Victoria, Australia
✟2,608.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
A business owned by businesspeople, and in this case, most likely Christian businesspeople.

Take Lydia in Philippi, for instance. Her business most likely required some amount of "warehouse" space, and that was most likely attached to her house.

But this--and your link--go to my point. Scripture does not command that Christians meet only in homes. What we see in scripture is that Christians met where they could--and that was at the time almost always a home because that's what was always available. But we also see instances of them meeting in other places, and there are certainly no directions to meet specifically in homes.

And there are no directions or examples in scripture where the NTC financed, built and met in purpose built sanctuaries.
 
Upvote 0

As I was saying

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2015
1,258
200
82
Drouin, Victoria, Australia
✟2,608.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
What a joke. You had a long history of bishops stretching back to the apostles before Constantine. "Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church." Ignatius, 107 AD

Note he didn't say the "Roman Catholic Church."
 
Upvote 0

As I was saying

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2015
1,258
200
82
Drouin, Victoria, Australia
✟2,608.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
often the difference from evangelistic meetings and church meetings in the home, are missed by many. It seems that wen the revival evangelistic meetings took place and they used large halls for such meetings, that these places became the church and so the stress was on evangelism, not a church meeting with every member edifying eachother. We see the remnants of this at many places where the so called "altar call" is offered at the end of the meeting, showing it as an evangelistic meeting. I speak of a church meeting edifying itself under Christ headship and ministering their gifts to one another and having a meal etc.

Revival evangelistic meeting never happened in the NTC because they didn't need revival as they were living it every day. Paul's main place of evangelism was the synagogue or a public hall that was there for debating and conversing. The church never built any halls and most of the time evangelism was done with the way they lived as in "How much they loved each other."
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheMissingRib
Upvote 0

As I was saying

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2015
1,258
200
82
Drouin, Victoria, Australia
✟2,608.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
show me one verse that says ( or even remotely says) that there is one man over a entire church called the pastor, and that he gets a regular salary.

And I am not talking about history, or so called "church fathers", or traditions of men. Scripture, from the apostolic order in the NT is what I seek. I have many scriptures that say the opposite of a one man pastor gift over the whole church.

I want to see this one man ministry called The Pastor", in scripture over all and getting a salary. Specifically I speak of the man who dominates all christendom, not teachers evangelist apostles, prophets etc, but that Pastor role.

what I find amazing and I marvel at it. is how so many people when they see the clear scriptures i give and the biblical order and joy of body ministry under Christ headship and all care for one another, no one man getting paid over all. They argue and defend their tradition, often just simply denying scripture and the clear exhortations from it. How many think that they are rich and increased with goods and have need of NOTHING. If Jesus was knocking they would say, what were doing great.

In support of what you say the one verse does not exist. There are 25 verses in the New Testament that talks about leadership and not one of them includes "pastors." They all talk about Apostles, Prophets and Elders (male).

I wrote a paper on NT leadership and dialogued with several denominations leaders about it and pointed out the glaringly obvious about unpaid plural Elders, not one pastor, and they all said the same thing in response..."Yes but..." which meant that tradition was more important than truth.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

As I was saying

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2015
1,258
200
82
Drouin, Victoria, Australia
✟2,608.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
no there is no clergy and laity as meaning a leader over others

"The word “clergy”, comes from the Greek word “kleros”, meaning “heritage, inhertitance or lot”, showing that believers are the inheritance, or heritage of God and it is used that way in scripture as we read ,

“ Neither as being lords over God’s heritage [Kleros], but being examples to the flock.” (1 Peter 5:3).

The word “laity” means comes from the word “laos”, meaning, “a people”, and it is used that way in scripture.

“And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people [laos].” ( 2 Corinthians 6:16)

There is no such thing as a clergy and latiy division. The “kleros:, and the “laity” both refer to the body of Christ. We are the inheritance of God and the people of God.
Again we see that mans traditions and order has caused a schism in the body.

One of the most significant facts abut this clergy/laity divide is the torn curtain in the temple at Jesus death. Only the High Priest was allowed to go into the holy of holies once a year to atone for the sins of the people and this was divided from other parts by a very heavy curtain.

I believe with all my heart that the message of this event was very clear. The barrier to God was removed and everyone was allowed into his presence. No high priest or clergy were needed. This began the priesthood of ALL believers. Now I know some churches do not accept this and as a result are making Jesus death on the cross irrelevant.

For those who do believe this, they have unrivalled access to God and his son any time, any place and for any reason.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.