meadowlark
Regular Member
The thread from post one would be of honest content only if it were titled 'do women have a right to post on GT'
Upvote
0
The thread from post one would be of honest content only if it were titled 'do women have a right to post on GT'
And is it biblical for the ordained clergy to take a back seat while someone else leads the service?
Honesty like that seems to elude people like the OP'er.
Cause they want to be justified in their delusions.
Delusion? For believing what the Word of God says is true and for sincerely asking other believers if such a person behaving in a way that appears to be in a manner contrary to scripture is okay according to the Bible?
Then why is Paul mentioning it, if it is after the cross? If this is indeed the early Christian church, a time to follow Christ, why the mention of telling women to be silent if it was void?
No, but I didn't expect to
A comfort that a few of us don't have to be sure. But to me,that's also part of the mystery of faith....the struggle.Sometimes I think that being Catholic really does make religion much easier to comprehend.
No, but I didn't expect to
Only He can provide the ultimate answer when He comes again in glory. Till then we are really scratching around in the dark on a lot of this aren't we?I think it's one of those debates that will stay around until Christ returns.
Like a lot of controversial debates!!
Only He can provide the ultimate answer when He comes again in glory. Till then we are really scratching around in the dark on a lot of this aren't we?
Only He can provide the ultimate answer when He comes again in glory. Till then we are really scratching around in the dark on a lot of this aren't we?
A comfort that a few of us don't have to be sure. But to me,that's also part of the mystery of faith....the struggle.
We all struggle to live as Christ calls us to live, that is why our Lord referred to the cross that each of us must take up and carry. The road that we must travel is not easy. But I am happy that some struggles (such as finding the right congregation in a locale where there are dozens to choose from) are not so significant for me because I am a Catholic and my choices are narrowed down to the local Parish church or churches in my locale. For me there are two close by, and another dozen or so within 15 minutes to 20 minutes driving. I go to the one whose territory includes my address. It's been a happy experience for many years now.
My Church has handled these scripture conundrums for many centuries and always stuck with the solution that she now applies to this question; women may participate in church, sing, lead the singing, teach and write instructions and so forth but women may not be ordained to the roles of deacon, priest, or bishop. This isn't because the Church believes that scripture is immune from the norms of culture that applied at the time of its writing or immune from interpretation to suit the needs and situations that arise in our culture, on the contrary she has always taught that cultures do change and that the message of the gospel can be contextualised to suit peoples of different cultures. What remains unchanged is the text of sacred scripture and when people seek to change the text by pretending that ancient cultures were so backwards and unworthy that we can safely rewrite the scriptures so that the nasty elements of ancient culture are expunged then the Church says no, the text is not to be changed. The subject matter of this thread is one area where people do try to dismiss the text on the assumption that ancient cultures were basically ignorant and nasty and unjust towards women and that therefore what the scriptures say about women and men and the roles open to each within the church is ignorant and nasty and unjust towards women. That is an error that Christians ought to resist.Yes, but .....
Where 50% of humanity is affected by a matter I don't see the Scriptures as being that opaque on the issue. What I discern as a significant underlying (i.e. a preconception) is how we see the biblical texts, whether some divinely 'dictated' 'here-it-is-no-cultural-factors' set of binding precepts, or inspiration that also includes working with the authors' purposes and styles infused with by the Holy Spirit writing within a cultural context from which we can derive applications to our context today.
John
NZ
You're very likely right about those expectations.I never have much hope of changing minds in these discussions. About the most I expect is a clearer understanding of where the disagreements are.
Whereas my own church is more open to understanding that the culture changes and that the spirit of Scriptural and Traditional awareness needs to be re-examined in light of the change so that, while the core of the message remains in place and the traditions is still observed, the response to change is seen in the fabric of the church.My Church has handled these scripture conundrums for many centuries and always stuck with the solution that she now applies to this question; women may participate in church, sing, lead the singing, teach and write instructions and so forth but women may not be ordained to the roles of deacon, priest, or bishop. This isn't because the Church believes that scripture is immune from the norms of culture that applied at the time of its writing or immune from interpretation to suit the needs and situations that arise in our culture, on the contrary she has always taught that cultures do change and that the message of the gospel can be contextualised to suit peoples of different cultures. What remains unchanged is the text of sacred scripture and when people seek to change the text but pretending that ancient cultures were so backwards and unworthy that we can safely rewrite the scriptures so that the nasty elements of ancient culture are expunged then the Church says no, the text is not to be changed. The subject matter of this thread is one area where people do try to dismiss the text on the assumption that ancient cultures were basically ignorant and nasty and unjust towards women and that therefore what the scriptures say about women and men and the roles open to each within the church is ignorant and nasty and unjust towards women. That is an error that Christians ought to resist.
You're very likely right about those expectations.
You and Azure have much accomplished bringing it to light while much still lies in darknessI never have much hope of changing minds in these discussions. About the most I expect is a clearer understanding of where the disagreements are.