Natural disasters - Punishment from God?

Pink Spider

EUROPEAN ANGLICAN
Site Supporter
May 26, 2013
10,929
493
Sweden
✟38,072.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
There are tsunamis because the land mass of Earth rests on tectonic plates which sometimes shift, creating earthquakes and waves of monstrous proportion. Had the surface of the earth not had rested on tectonic plates, the condition would not have existed for the emergence of life.

Humanity is unique and complex creatures because of the nature of the human genome, which contains copying errors, which sometimes lead to genetic illnesses. But without those errors, there would not be the mutation that gave rise to species.

There's nothing humanity has done to cause this, it is not a result of the original sin in any way. There are natural evils because of the way our planet is made. There are personal evils because of what we do to ourselves and one another.
I agree 100%! Excellent post and solid rational
thinking. :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

Hospes

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2005
1,245
117
Arizona
Visit site
✟48,887.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
There are tsunamis because the land mass of Earth rests on tectonic plates which sometimes shift, creating earthquakes and waves of monstrous proportion. Had the surface of the earth not had rested on tectonic plates, the condition would not have existed for the emergence of life.

Humanity is unique and complex creatures because of the nature of the human genome, which contains copying errors, which sometimes lead to genetic illnesses. But without those errors, there would not be the mutation that gave rise to species.

There's nothing humanity has done to cause this, it is not a result of the original sin in any way. There are natural evils because of the way our planet is made. There are personal evils because of what we do to ourselves and one another.
Most of what you have written I'd agree with. But am I right in thinking you think God is somehow not involved with any of it? Does he reign over all of it, i.e. have the wherewithal to move it as he sees fit? If he does, then in essence he either passively or actively causes it.
 
Upvote 0

lesliedellow

Member
Sep 20, 2010
9,652
2,582
United Kingdom
Visit site
✟104,175.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Most of what you have written I'd agree with. But am I right in thinking you think God is somehow not involved with any of it? Does he reign over all of it, i.e. have the wherewithal to move it as he sees fit? If he does, then in essence he either passively or actively causes it.

That is something present day Christins have trouble with, but it is not something the biblical authors had trouble with - i.e. Isaiah 45.7. They were quite prepared to accept that God's lordship over all things means what it says.
 
Upvote 0

Matariki

Love the Lord with all your heart, soul and MIND
Jan 24, 2011
704
39
New Zealand
✟8,620.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Greetings! :wave:

I have often heard Christians say that one or the
other natural catastrophe was/is punishment
from God.


By natural disaster I mean:
Earthquakes, Flooding, Tsunami's, Hurricanes,
Droughts, Hailstorms, Epidemics etc.


Is that true? What is your opinion (especially in
respect and compared to Biblical disasters)?

For the 99.9% of the equation, No, natural disasters are not a punishment from God. Its the result of the earth functioning as it should. And what we view to be natural disasters, aren't disasters until humans find themselves stuck in the middle of them. Otherwise besides that, they're actually very important for the functioning of the earth. Without them we would have problems such as the earth exploding, no livable landmass, not enough drinkable water, lack of nutrient distribution and weak immune systems (or an overcrowding of the earth). The problem is that most people like to focus on the negative aspects of how the earth functions, which leads to ignorance of the positives.

As for the flood or any other natural disaster account that occurs in the bible being the result of God's judgement, I think one ought to be careful when reading books like Genesis as we are dealing with a much older and different culture to what we are currently living in. Although it is very possible for God to use a natural disaster for whatever purpose he had in mind, this still doesn't mean that we ought to take claims at face value without first investigating into them.
 
Upvote 0

Pink Spider

EUROPEAN ANGLICAN
Site Supporter
May 26, 2013
10,929
493
Sweden
✟38,072.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
For the 99.9% of the equation, No, natural disasters are not a punishment from God. Its the result of the earth functioning as it should. And what we view to be natural disasters, aren't disasters until humans find themselves stuck in the middle of them. Otherwise besides that, they're actually very important for the functioning of the earth. Without them we would have problems such as the earth exploding, no livable landmass, not enough drinkable water, lack of nutrient distribution and weak immune systems (or an overcrowding of the earth). The problem is that most people like to focus on the negative aspects of how the earth functions, which leads to ignorance of the positives.
Obviously, I agree 100%. Your comment is concise
and rational and very well written (better than I
could do it) :thumbsup:


As for the flood or any other natural disaster account that occurs in the bible being the result of God's judgement, I think one ought to be careful when reading books like Genesis as we are dealing with a much older and different culture to what we are currently living in.
I agree!

Although it is very possible for God to use a natural disaster for whatever purpose he had in mind, this still doesn't mean that we ought to take claims at face value without first investigating into them.
I am tempted to agree with the first part of
your sentence.


I 100% agree with the second part.
______________________________________

Your post/comment is excellently written - thank
you for posting. :wave:

 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,184
1,809
✟825,826.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You mean someone who has survived a disaster
will more likely accept god than someone who
hasn't?
No.

That is not the criteria God uses.

Not everyone that dies in a disaster had all the opportunities they needed to accept or reject God’s charity. From my understanding these individual would go on to heaven without obtaining Godly type Love, but would only have a strong child for wonderful parent type Love and might need everlasting protection and preserving from those with Godly type Love in heaven.


Isn't that a bit akin with the saying:
'There are no Atheists in foxholes'?
The fear of tragedies does bring mature adults to their senses, but that does not mean it automatically converts them. It has to do with the sincerity of their belief and not just what they “verbally” express under stress.

Is that my primary earthly objective?

Yes! Humbly accepting God’s Love (Charity) in the form of accepting God’s forgiveness is your primary objective. You start out though having: 1. to come to your senses enough, 2. to realize where you are, 3. how you got there, 4. where you are going and 5. Want to change.

By realizing how bad you have it and how much you need to be forgiven of, allows you to realize how much God has forgiven you of, so as Jesus taught (and you should know from experience) “…he that is forgiven much will Love much…” That unbelievable huge Love (Godly Love) comes from being forgiven of an unbelievable huge amount of sin debt.


Yes - but first of all he needs evidence that
God exist.
Not really. Experiencing God’s Love being given/shown through true Christians can allow you to desire such selfless Love or reject that selfless Love. God is Love so humbly accepting Godly type Love is accepting God.
Relationships that are 'formed' under extreme
circumstances, seldom last long...


Soldiers that have gone into battle together seem to form lasting relationships. You are right to suggest just helping people that need big time help at the time do not necessarily become brothers working for the same cause. The person being helped at least has the opportunity to experience what Godly type Love is and decide if that Love is what they desire in their life.
 
Upvote 0

Pink Spider

EUROPEAN ANGLICAN
Site Supporter
May 26, 2013
10,929
493
Sweden
✟38,072.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
No.

That is not the criteria God uses.
I see.

Not everyone that dies in a disaster had all the opportunities they needed to accept or reject God’s charity[...]
That makes sense.

[...]From my understanding these individual would go on to heaven without obtaining Godly type Love, but would only have a strong child for wonderful parent type Love and might need everlasting protection and preserving from those with Godly type Love in heaven.
You can't be serious...

The fear of tragedies does bring mature adults to their senses, but that does not mean it automatically converts them.
I agree.

It has to do with the sincerity of their belief and not just what they “verbally” express under stress.
I agree.


Yes! Humbly accepting God’s Love (Charity) in the form of accepting God’s forgiveness is your primary objective.
I beg to disagree. The main goal and basic
objective is and was from the dawn of mankind
to our times to survive.

You start out though having: 1. to come to your senses enough, 2. to realize where you are, 3. how you got there, 4. where you are going and 5. Want to change.
Ok - that makes sense as far as I understand it.



By realizing how bad you have it and how much you need to be forgiven of, allows you to realize how much God has forgiven you of, so as Jesus taught (and you should know from experience) “…he that is forgiven much will Love much…”
In my experience: He that is forgiven much will
soon forget.
No offense or blasphemy intended!

That unbelievable huge Love (Godly Love) comes from being forgiven of an unbelievable huge amount of sin debt.
So it's quid pro quo after all?


Not really. Experiencing God’s Love being given/shown through true Christians can allow you to desire such selfless Love or reject that selfless Love. God is Love so humbly accepting Godly type Love is accepting God.
I can not make out whether that is true or not.
I am not a Christian.

Soldiers that have gone into battle together seem to form
lasting relationships.
That is true.

You are right to suggest just helping people that need big
time help at the time do not necessarily become brothers
working for the same cause.
OK.

The person being helped at least has the opportunity to
experience what Godly type Love is and decide if that Love is what they desire in their life.
The person being helped has IMHO first to thank
the person(s) that helped her/him.
 
Upvote 0

4christ88

Angel in training
Jan 10, 2004
3,573
175
Queens, NYC, US
✟19,612.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Greetings! :wave:

I have often heard Christians say that one or the
other natural catastrophe was/is punishment
from God.


By natural disaster I mean:
Earthquakes, Flooding, Tsunami's, Hurricanes,
Droughts, Hailstorms, Epidemics etc.


Is that true? What is your opinion (especially in
respect and compared to Biblical disasters)?

From the geography classes I took in High School, i learnt about plate tectonics and their movements which case earthquakes, tsunami's, volcanoes and so on...


So the people who says God is using natural disasters as a punishment probably didn't take a single geography class *shrug* besides the term itself "natural disaster" is pretty self explanatory.

What God caused in the bible, let's say Egypt during the whole "let my people go" era, it was beyond ordinary...it had to be so that pharoah could be convinced that it was really God demanding him to free the Israelites, the plagues caused was not something his bunch of wizards could perform with a wave of their sticks.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

4christ88

Angel in training
Jan 10, 2004
3,573
175
Queens, NYC, US
✟19,612.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
.
.
Originally Posted by bling
Not really. Experiencing God’s Love being given/shown through true Christians can allow you to desire such selfless Love or reject that selfless Love. God is Love so humbly accepting Godly type Love is accepting God.
--------
I can not make out whether that is true or not.
I am not a Christian.
.

Hey there pink spider...hmm totally curious about your name cuz making a spider pink wouldnt endear me anymore to the spider species no matter how sparkingly coolly coloured it appears haha

anyways, back to what I originally intended to say in reply to your statement:

God is LOVE, you (NOT) believing in him or his love towards you does not change the fact that you have God's love. Me receiving someone's act of love and knowing nothing about it does not negate the fact that I have received that person's love :)

Sorry just thought I should chip that in! ;) I know you'll totally reject what I said but I had to say it :holy:
 
Upvote 0

Pink Spider

EUROPEAN ANGLICAN
Site Supporter
May 26, 2013
10,929
493
Sweden
✟38,072.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
.
.
.
Hello, thank you for your post! :wave:


From the geography classes I took in High School, i learnt about plate tectonics and their movements which case earthquakes, tsunami's, volcanoes and so on...
Cool! :cool:

So the people who says God is using natural disasters as a punishment probably didn't take a single geography class *shrug* besides the term itself "natural disaster" is pretty self explanatory.
Exactly! :thumbsup:

What God caused in the bible, let's say Egypt during the whole "let my people go" era, it was beyond ordinary...it had to be so that pharoah could be convinced that it was really God demanding him to free the Israelites, the plagues caused was not something his bunch of wizards could perform with a wave of their sticks.
I see...
.
.
.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,184
1,809
✟825,826.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I beg to disagree. The main goal and basic
objective is and was from the dawn of mankind
to our times to survive.
I actually agree with you to some extent.

All human have a natural survival instinct that gives value for their own life and makes eternal life desirable. People need this instinct.

Unbelievers controlled by their instincts will not know of any other “objective”.

The “objective” while here on earth is to become like God himself and not just survive as a human. God is wanting us to be just like he is in that we have this all powerful controlling Love that compels God to do all God does. We do this by not doing something, but by just allowing God to do stuff for us.

So what does a person need to help them allow God to help them?



In my experience: He that is forgiven much will
soon forget.
No offense or blasphemy intended!
The problem is; we protect our egos by reasoning: we were really not forgiven of that much, those doing the forgiving really got something personally out of it, we deserved to be forgiven, or we can pay the forgiving person back some way so it is more a loan.

All this "logic" avoids acceptance of the forgiveness as pure charity.








The person being helped has IMHO first to thank
the person(s) that helped her/him.

The helper should say: “Do not thank me, I would have never personally helped you, but since Christ Loves me and I cannot do anything for Him directly I help you, since that is what he wants, so thank Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Pink Spider

EUROPEAN ANGLICAN
Site Supporter
May 26, 2013
10,929
493
Sweden
✟38,072.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Hello! :wave:

Hey there pink spider...hmm totally curious about your name cuz making a spider pink wouldnt endear me anymore to the spider species no matter how sparkingly coolly coloured it appears haha
Ha, ha ^_^ I'll PM you and then you'll know how
I got my name... :cool:

God is LOVE, you (NOT) believing in him or his love towards you does not change the fact that you have God's love. Me receiving someone's act of love and knowing nothing about it does not negate the fact that I have received that person's love :)
Hmmm - in a way I reckon that's true.
Good point btw.!

Sorry just thought I should chip that in! ;)
Thanks for that. :thumbsup:

I know you'll totally reject what I said but I had to say it :holy:
Not at all, I assure you. :)
.
.
.
.
pinkspider_zps8aa5eefd.png

.
.
.
.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Pink Spider

EUROPEAN ANGLICAN
Site Supporter
May 26, 2013
10,929
493
Sweden
✟38,072.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Hello again! Thank you for your reply! :wave:

I actually agree with you to some extent.

All human have a natural survival instinct that gives value for their own life and makes eternal life desirable. People need this instinct.
Yes - the survival instinct is at the very core of
every human being.

'Eternal life' - that's a totally different thing.

If you'd ask me whether I want to live forever:

I had to say: No.

Unbelievers controlled by their instincts will not know of any other “objective”.
I don't agree. There are a lot of other objectives
that a person may have without believing in
God.

For example:

- Be useful
- Help those in need
- Work hard
- Accomplish something that endures
- Get the best education you can get
- Learn as much as you can
- Avoid ignorance and narrow mindedness

etc.


Unbelievers are NOT solely controlled by
their instincts...

The “objective” while here on earth is to become like God himself and not just survive as a human.
But humans can never become 100% like
god, no?

God is wanting us to be just like he is in that we have this all powerful controlling Love that compels God to do all God
does.
Uhmm - OK.

We do this by not doing something, but by just allowing God to do stuff for us.
I do not really understand, sorry.

So what does a person need to help them allow God to help them?
Yes that would be the crucial question, no?

[...]those doing the forgiving really got something
personally out of it, we deserved to be forgiven, or
we can pay the forgiving person back some way so
it is more a loan.
That makes sense.


All this "logic" avoids acceptance of the forgiveness as pure charity.
Again, I'm afraid I do not understand.

The helper should say: “Do not thank me, I would have never personally helped you, but since Christ Loves me and I cannot do anything for Him directly I help you, since that is what he wants, so thank Christ.
As good as that sounds - when helping others I
do that because I feel compelled to do it.
There is the very important 'concept' of honor,
you know.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,184
1,809
✟825,826.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yes - the survival instinct is at the very core of
every human being.

'Eternal life' - that's a totally different thing.

If you'd ask me whether I want to live forever:

I had to say: No.
I do not want “eternal life” here on this messed up world (it tires you out), but eternal life being like God in heaven sounds pretty good. In heaven the only limit on how much God can give you is yourself.


I don't agree. There are a lot of other objectives
that a person may have without believing in
God.

For example:

- Be useful
- Help those in need
- Work hard
- Accomplish something that endures
- Get the best education you can get
- Learn as much as you can
- Avoid ignorance and narrow mindedness

etc.

OK, I agree.

Unbelievers are NOT solely controlled by
their instincts...

I was just talking about those that were.

But humans can never become 100% like
god, no?



We cannot be God, but God is a giver so we do not know the limits of his giving?



Yes that would be the crucial question, no?
It actually explains why we live in such a messed up world. All mature adults at some time in their life discover “needs” they have that really can only be satisfied by Deity.




Again, I'm afraid I do not understand.

Most humans will almost do anything to avoid having to humble themselves to the point of truly accepting pure charity as charity. God’s forgiveness of the sins of an individual is an act of pure generous charity, so most people will avoid accepting that charity as charity.

As good as that sounds - when helping others I
do that because I feel compelled to do it.
There is the very important 'concept' of honor,
you know.

You can certainly feel obligated or responsible or empathetic or even self-rewarded by helping others, it can increase yourself esteem.

Loving the unlovable is not really self-rewarding (the rapist, ungrateful, enemy, totally selfish, and murders).
 
Upvote 0