What's going on here lately?

macher

Well-Known Member
Oct 13, 2012
529
21
✟840.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
The Jews were not the lost sheep or the prodigal son. They were the son that stayed home and became jealous of YHWH's attention to his wayward children. First the Jews (kingdom of Judah), then to the gentiles (non-Jews: kingdom of Israel and then the nations).

The son that strayed was under the same family as the son that stayed. There are Jews(Israelites) who have strayed even today. Look at all the Israelites(Jews) today who's indentity are Israelites and have strayed.

The mystery of the one new man is that Israel(Jews) and Gentiles(non Israelites) are united as ONE in Jesus.

I'm an Israelite and you pat34lee are a non Israelite(Gentile). However in Messiah we are united as ONE as equal co heirs in the promise of Abraham.
 
Upvote 0

daq

Messianic
Jan 26, 2012
4,857
1,032
Devarim 11:21
Visit site
✟113,158.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The son that strayed was under the same family as the son that stayed. There are Jews(Israelites) who have strayed even today. Look at all the Israelites(Jews) today who's indentity are Israelites and have strayed.

The mystery of the one new man is that Israel(Jews) and Gentiles(non Israelites) are united as ONE in Jesus.

I'm an Israelite and you pat34lee are a non Israelite(Gentile). However in Messiah we are united as ONE as equal co heirs in the promise of Abraham.

I once asked a friend how it could be possible that Judah and Ephraim be reconciled and compared to ''one new man'' like two sticks in the hand of the Great Shepherd? And the reply to me was that for now I should liken my own heart as an altar to the Most High, made of the fertile 'adamah-soil of Judah, for the 'erets-commons are given over to the heathen until their time is fulfilled. I went to see if I could find this on a map; to no avail ... :)
 
Upvote 0

macher

Well-Known Member
Oct 13, 2012
529
21
✟840.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
I once asked a friend how it could be possible that Judah and Ephraim be reconciled and compared to ''one new man'' like two sticks in the hand of the Great Shepherd? And the reply to me was that for now I should liken my own heart as an altar to the Most High, made of the fertile 'adamah-soil of Judah, for the 'erets-commons are given over to the heathen until their time is fulfilled. I went to see if I could find this on a map; to no avail ... :)

There's nothing in the text in the Prodigal Son that suggests that the son who strayed was as you implied.

The 2 sons were under the same house and one strayed. The one that stayed didn't become a 'lost sheep of Israel' as it is suggested.
 
Upvote 0

pat34lee

Messianic
Sep 13, 2011
11,293
2,637
59
Florida, USA
✟89,330.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
The son that strayed was under the same family as the son that stayed. There are Jews(Israelites) who have strayed even today. Look at all the Israelites(Jews) today who's indentity are Israelites and have strayed.

The mystery of the one new man is that Israel(Jews) and Gentiles(non Israelites) are united as ONE in Jesus.

I'm an Israelite and you pat34lee are a non Israelite(Gentile). However in Messiah we are united as ONE as equal co heirs in the promise of Abraham.

The parable of the prodigal was not about individuals or small groups, but the two kingdoms of Israel. Ephraim will return one day and be welcomed back by the Father.

The two sticks of Ezekiel didn't say Judah and gentile. They said "For Judah, and for the children of Israel his companions:" and "For Joseph, the stick of E'phra-im, and for all the house of Israel his companions:"

I, in Messiah, am no longer gentile. I am grafted into the commonwealth of Israel. From Webster's 1828 dictionary under 'gentile':
The Hebrews included in the term goim or nations, all the tribes of men who had not received the true faith,and were not circumcised.
Search => [word] => gentile :: 1828 Dictionary :: Search the 1828 Noah Webster's Dictionary of the English Language (FREE) :: 1828.mshaffer.com
 
Upvote 0

Qnts2

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2012
1,323
111
✟2,056.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
It sounds like he was writing after the fact, so it would have been sometime after 32-33 AD. They knew the timeline of Daniel, and were looking for the Messiah. The problem was that they were looking for a king to destroy the Greeks and lead the nation to greatness because that is what they wanted. They weren't looking for a Messiah who came to call all people to repentance. First the Jews, then the lost sheep of Israel and the rest of the world.

Which is more likely? That YHWH would miss an appointment that he made and gave the exact time that it would happen, or that he was there for anyone who had eyes to see?

Since the Talmudic passage was written by Yonathan ben Uziel, it has nothing to do with as you stated.

Uziel also wrote the Targum Jonathan, and that particular Targum interprets Isaiah 53, the suffering servant, as applying to the Messiah. So Uziel saw Isaiah 53 as a prophetic passage concerning the suffering of the Messiah.

At various times in Jewish history, there was a Messianic fervor. One time was during the Roman Empire, and there have been others. There was a fear among the leaders of Judaism, that should the Messiah not arrive as believed, the people would abandon belief in the Messiah. During Jesus time, and for the next 100 years, there were several people considered as possibilities.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
It seems to be relative. When I mix with M's and read MJ stuff, I don't see this forum as anything like what it is IRL. The real world MJism is way saner by and large (of course there are exceptions!)
MJism abroad in other parts of the world is radically different than how it is often practiced in American culture. You don't really see battles often over things debated here - like claiming "You're a Christian and I'm a Messianic Jew!!" since to be Messianic Jewish is to be a Jewish believer in Messiah and other Jews in Israel who follow the Lord are seen as Messianic/Christian simultaneously.....and when it comes to Jewish culture, you don't see many things fought over that folks fight over here like saying "You as a Gentile cannot be apart of the community and see as Jewish even though you may live a Jewish lifestyle" since they understand the concept of converts being present.

Many other examples besides that. What's IRL, by the way?
 
Upvote 0

Qnts2

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2012
1,323
111
✟2,056.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Easy G (G²);61924412 said:
you don't see many things fought over that folks fight over here like saying "You as a Gentile cannot be apart of the community and see as Jewish even though you may live a Jewish lifestyle" since they understand the concept of converts being present.

I think saying a Gentile cannot be a part of the community, referred to a Gentile attending a synagogue, not a Messianic synagogue.

And the truth is, it wouldn't matter how long a Gentile attended a synagogue, especially an Orthodox synagogue, they would not and never could be a part of the community. Because they are Gentile, there are limitations, and things they could not participate in.

That would be true in Israel also.

Although, from a Jewish cultural view, it is different in Israel.

But, it is true that many of the things discussed here are non-issues elsewhere.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Lulav

Y'shua is His Name
Aug 24, 2007
34,141
7,243
✟494,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Who was the first to commit the talmud to paper? Akiva. Look up his history regarding messianic believers, bar Kosiba, and the revolt. The talmud wasn't written by those who simply don't believe. It was written by people rabidly opposed to Yeshua and his followers.

You do know that Akiva was a convert right? And the Talmud records him as saying that he had such hatred for Torah scholars before he became a student that had he had the chance he would have bitten them like a wild donkey (Pesachim 49b).

Hmm,wild donkey, wasn't that what G-d said Ishmael would be?
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I think saying a Gentile cannot be a part of the community, referred to a Gentile attending a synagogue, not a Messianic synagogue.

And the truth is, it wouldn't matter how long a Gentile attended a synagogue, especially an Orthodox synagogue, they would not and never could be a part of the community. Because they are Gentile, there are limitations, and things they could not participate in.

That would be true in Israel also. .


Although, from a Jewish cultural view, it is different in Israel.
If one wishes to live as a Gentile within the community while not living as a Jew within the community, that's more than understandable. However, again, those who are Gentile Converts to Judaism are not treated as seperate from the Jewish people anymore than it was for Gentiles to convert to the Hebrew Culture/assimilate - and that also goes for Gentiles married to Jewish individuals/raising children together in the synagouge. A lot of synagouges that are Orthodox have made it a big deal for the converts to not feel as if they're destined to always be second-class
But, it is true that many of the things discussed here are non-issues elsewhere
Indeed. MessianicMommy has often shared a lot on that very issue...
 
Upvote 0

daq

Messianic
Jan 26, 2012
4,857
1,032
Devarim 11:21
Visit site
✟113,158.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
There's nothing in the text in the Prodigal Son that suggests that the son who strayed was as you implied.

The 2 sons were under the same house and one strayed. The one that stayed didn't become a 'lost sheep of Israel' as it is suggested.

I did not say anythig about the prodigal son in my comments. However, I did speak of the altar of 'adamah from the Decalogue. :)
 
Upvote 0

Qnts2

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2012
1,323
111
✟2,056.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Easy G (G²);61925914 said:
If one wishes to live as a Gentile within the community while not living as a Jew within the community, that's more than understandable. However, again, those who are Gentile Converts to Judaism are not treated as seperate from the Jewish people anymore than it was for Gentiles to convert to the Hebrew Culture/assimilate - and that also goes for Gentiles married to Jewish individuals/raising children together in the synagouge. A lot of synagouges that are Orthodox have made it a big deal for the converts to not feel as if they're destined to always be second-classIndeed. MessianicMommy has often shared a lot on that very issue...

If a Gentile converts to Judaism, they are no longer a Gentile. They are fully Jewish and a member of the Jewish community. So when I say a Gentile who hangs around the Jewish community, I am not referring to a convert.

A Gentile who attends synagogue and hangs around the Jewish community does not full rights in the community. In Judaism, the lesser 'rights' or obligations does not make the Gentile a second class person. It simply means the person is Gentile and not Jewish. In Judaism, a Gentile does not have the same laws or obligations as a Jewish person, and therefore can not serve the same as a Jewish person. As mentioned before, a Gentile does not count towards a minyon.

View it similarly to a closed communion. A person might attend services every week at a closed communion church, while a member of that church only attends 3 times a year. But the non-member can not take communion because they are not a member. A Gentile who attends an Orthodox synagogue but does not convert is not a member of that community and while welcomed as a guest and friend, is not a member and therefore is limited in certain areas. This is not making the person second class.

For Messianic Gentiles who attend a synagogue, should they convert, it is assumed they are renouncing Yeshua. So, the choice will be to be fully Jewish and a member of the Jewish community and renounce Jesus, or a Gentile who joins in with the Jewish community but not as a member of the community and maintaining belief and allegiance to Yeshua.

In the Reform movement, of course it is a bit different, as the Reform movement has a somewhat high level of mixed marriages, so a Gentile spouse will be more included so that they are more comfortable in a synagogue setting as their children of raised Jewish.
 
Upvote 0

macher

Well-Known Member
Oct 13, 2012
529
21
✟840.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
If a Gentile converts to Judaism, they are no longer a Gentile. They are fully Jewish and a member of the Jewish community. So when I say a Gentile who hangs around the Jewish community, I am not referring to a convert.

A Gentile who attends synagogue and hangs around the Jewish community does not full rights in the community. In Judaism, the lesser 'rights' or obligations does not make the Gentile a second class person. It simply means the person is Gentile and not Jewish. In Judaism, a Gentile does not have the same laws or obligations as a Jewish person, and therefore can not serve the same as a Jewish person. As mentioned before, a Gentile does not count towards a minyon.

View it similarly to a closed communion. A person might attend services every week at a closed communion church, while a member of that church only attends 3 times a year. But the non-member can not take communion because they are not a member. A Gentile who attends an Orthodox synagogue but does not convert is not a member of that community and while welcomed as a guest and friend, is not a member and therefore is limited in certain areas. This is not making the person second class.

For Messianic Gentiles who attend a synagogue, should they convert, it is assumed they are renouncing Yeshua. So, the choice will be to be fully Jewish and a member of the Jewish community and renounce Jesus, or a Gentile who joins in with the Jewish community but not as a member of the community and maintaining belief and allegiance to Yeshua.

In the Reform movement, of course it is a bit different, as the Reform movement has a somewhat high level of mixed marriages, so a Gentile spouse will be more included so that they are more comfortable in a synagogue setting as their children of raised Jewish.

Well we have to put this in a 'Messianic' perspective.

In regards to salvation a Gentile doesn't need to convert. For Jews they are already Jewish and so are their males according to Gen 17.

I believe what we see in the scriptures is a sort of split of Jewish believers and Gentiles into a separate congregation because those that weren't believers said 'Gentiles must be circumcised to be saved'. In other words Gentiles had to convert to be saved.

So I believe there were separate 'churches' from the main stream synagogues where Jew and Gentile could be together as equal co heirs of the promise of Abraham that Jesus fulfilled. I do believe it was a community with separate identities but these indentures were one in Messiah.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
If a Gentile converts to Judaism, they are no longer a Gentile. They are fully Jewish and a member of the Jewish community. So when I say a Gentile who hangs around the Jewish community, I am not referring to a convert.
If you're not referring to a convert, cool. We agree/that's the end of it really. Of course a Gentile who converts is considered Jewish/member of the community, even though their Gentile background is remembered - and for those who are Gentiles/God Fearers in the community, it is thankfully not the case where the Lord ever said that one had to be fully Jewish in order to have access to things. However, some of this has already been discussed before and there's no need bringing it up again.

But indeed, for Gentiles who were included in the community, it is not a small matter. And from a Messianic perspective, it must be kept in mind. Cornelius in Acts 10 is an excellent one to consider. And there are other examples besides that to consider...

As scripture notes:
Acts 10/Acts 10:19

Cornelius Calls for Peter

1At Caesarea there was a man named Cornelius, a centurion in what was known as the Italian Regiment. 2He and all his family were devout and God-fearing; he gave generously to those in need and prayed to God regularly. 3One day at about three in the afternoon he had a vision. He distinctly saw an angel of God, who came to him and said, "Cornelius!" 4Cornelius stared at him in fear. "What is it, Lord?" he asked.

The angel answered, "Your prayers and gifts to the poor have come up as a memorial offering before God.


Cornelius was a Gentile who attached himself to Judaism but chose not to undergo formal conversion, which included public circumcision and public immersion (proselyte baptism). This class of Gentiles, known in Judaism as "proselytes of the gate", was quite large at this time. They were attracted to the nobility of the Jewish worship and truth of the one God who had revealed himself in the Bible....but for various reasons did not become Jews. There is the reality ot others who are "GOD-Fearers", who are in no way following all things Jewish--and yet they're still cool with God. The same is true for our times today...


And to be clear, for those who wish to live a Jewish lifestyle as Gentiles due to their being convicted to do so, they have the freedom to do so since the same thing seemed to occur many times in the scriptures...specifically in regards to those who had a Ruth-Like mindset of joining with the Jewish people and honoring their mindset....and I do think that there's a beauty to those who wish to be Messianic Gentiles, as FFOZ has noted alongside many other groups. One of the books I was able to read on it growing up is by Don Fito, entitled Your People Shall Be My People----and it's very well written in regards to discussing those who wish to have a Ruth-Like calling toward joining with the Jewish people for the sake of outreach/identification.

Acts 15:23-29 makes it clear that in order to become a child of God, a Gentile does not need to undergo conversion rites to Judaism in order to be accepted...nor are they bound to be concerned at all with whether they are allowed to eat Kosher foods.....and in fact, Rav Shaul (Paul) takes it one step further in saying that Messianic gentiles should remain as they are and not seek to become part of Israel in the flesh (I Corinthians 7:18-24) ---but if one wishes to live in a specific way, that is their decision.

It always becomes an issue when Gentiles try to live Jewishly thinking they now have the rights to speak as if they themselves are "Jews"/belonging to Israel and do so because of a fixation on all things "Israel"----as that has caused great damage in the Body....and it is an issue when many Gentile believers today, in their search for "the Jewish roots of the faith" are adopting traditional Jewish ways not mandated by Scripture....specifically in regards to how traditional Judaism's oral law contains conversion rituals and too many Messianics are attempting to 'graft' those beliefs into Messianic Judaism.

Being "Jewish" was never what the Lord was concerned on for Gentiles, for as Peter said, " in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him." ( Acts 10:34-35 ). More on where I stand in this regard is seen here in #229, #15 and #17 --for when anything Gentile is despised just for one to call themselves "Israel", that's a problem. And As another said best, " What a great cosmic joke, after 2,000 years of separation begun by anti-Semitism, for Jewish and Gentile believers to begin to come together, and be torn apart this time, not by anti-Semitism, but by its converse, let us call it anti-Gentilism! Such divisions are not scriptural, and only give place to the devil."

Also, As another said best in a paper presented to the International Messianic Jewish Alliance meeting in Puerto Vallarta Mexico in 1997 :
Identifying With Israel




The primary role of Gentiles in the Body of the Messiah is to identify with Israel. To identify with Israel is different from identifying as Israel. As Gentiles, our struggle must be to show that we have been brought into a relationship with the God of Abraham without being a replacement of Israel. But there is a danger here. If Gentiles lose their own identity and become copy-cat Jews, or if the differences become hidden, the purpose for the body to be both Jew and Gentile in one new man will be lost.

We are to appreciate both Jewish and Gentile culture...and for those Gentiles within the movement who feel that all Gentiles MUST live as Jewish people in order to appreciate them, it's a big problem. As Yeshua noted:
Luke 7

The Faith of the Centurion

1When Jesus had finished saying all this in the hearing of the people, he entered Capernaum. 2There a centurion's servant, whom his master valued highly, was sick and about to die. 3The centurion heard of Jesus and sent some elders of the Jews to him, asking him to come and heal his servant. 4When they came to Jesus, they pleaded earnestly with him, "This man deserves to have you do this, 5because he loves our nation and has built our synagogue." 6So Jesus went with them.

He was not far from the house when the centurion sent friends to say to him: "Lord, don't trouble yourself, for I do not deserve to have you come under my roof. 7That is why I did not even consider myself worthy to come to you. But say the word, and my servant will be healed. 8For I myself am a man under authority, with soldiers under me. I tell this one, 'Go,' and he goes; and that one, 'Come,' and he comes. I say to my servant, 'Do this,' and he does it."


9When Jesus heard this, he was amazed at him, and turning to the crowd following him, he said, "I tell you, I have not found such great faith even in Israel." 10Then the men who had been sent returned to the house and found the servant well.
Matthew 8:4-6is the place where the other version is given....and of course, in Luke's account, others came to Jesus on his behalf while Matthew's account does not mention them at all. The accounts may seem contradictory--but Matthew, as he often does, simply abbreviates the story. For in Matthew, he actually reports what the centurion said through the messengers, based on the idea that what the person does through an agent is what the person himself does. Regarding the text, when the Roman centurion addresses Jesus as "Lord", he shows a remarkable sensitivity for Jewish traditions...saying he's unworthy of receiving Jesus into his Gentile home, as a Jew who entered the home of a Gentile became ceremonially unclean ( Acts 10:27-29 / ).

Some other interesting things from the text are that the normal relationship between Romans and Jews, as is usual between conquerors and conquered, was not one of love and trust---from either side. But this pagan Roman officer had demonstrated a love for the Jewish people which moved the Jewish leaders to plead on his behalf before Yeshua, whose primary ministry was not to Gentiles but to Jews..especially as evidenced in his interaction with the girl whose daughter was possessed/was a Gentile ( Matthew 10:4-6 / /Matthew 15:25-27/ ). Love was demonstrated to be a matter of deeds--"he built the synagogue for us!"--not mere words or feelings; and this is its primary meaning throughout Scripture. Similarly, in modern times "Righteous Gentiles" have been honored by trees planted along the road to Israel's Yad VaShem Memorial of the Holocaust because they risked their own death to save Jewish lives. Examples of such would be people such as Chiune Sugihara, a Japanese individual who saved many Jewish people during his time in China and was a rescuer of Jews during the Nazi Holocaust.....one of the greatest example of what it means to be a "God-Fearer" and how being a Gentile isn't something to be ashamed of.


In regards to Matthew 8:4-6 and the Roman Centurion, of course Replacement Theologians and those against Jews may conclude that Jesus was excluding Jews from the Kingdom---but the point of the story was not exclusion. Rather, it was inclusion......as here Yeshua clearly states that Gentiles from ALL OVER (from the east and the west), even an army officer of the hated Roman Empire, can by virtue of trusting in God join God's people Israel and take their places at the feast in the Kingdom of Heaven with Abraham, Issac and Jacob. Of course, this very thing has occurred many times before---whether with Rabab the Prostitute when she joined the people of God ( Joshua 6:24-26 / /Hebrews 11:30-32 /James 2:24-26 )..or Ruth..who was in the line of Christ ( Matthew 1:4-6 / ) after she joined on with the Jewish people, even though she was a Moabite ( Ruth 1:1 /Genesis 19:36-38/ ) and the Law forbade anyone of Moabite descent to enter the sanctuary due to Moab's history ( Deuteronomy 23:2-4/ /Numbers 22:1 )
A Gentile who attends synagogue and hangs around the Jewish community does not full rights in the community. In Judaism, the lesser 'rights' or obligations does not make the Gentile a second class person. It simply means the person is Gentile and not Jewish
There's actually the dynamic of Jews having the same experience, as just because one's Jewish doesn't mean one gets to be fully involved - specifically in the event that one's not really connected to the community, involved or working with it, sporadically present or not truly zealous for the Lord. There's a lifestyle dynamic that goes alongside access and mobility.
In Judaism, a Gentile does not have the same laws or obligations as a Jewish person, and therefore can not serve the same as a Jewish person.
Indeed - although having differing requirements or laws isn't always the same as saying one is not to be considered a full member of a fellowship.
View it similarly to a closed communion. A person might attend services every week at a closed communion church, while a member of that church only attends 3 times a year. But the non-member can not take communion because they are not a member.
Bad example, as even in those churches where a member attends 3 times a year, many places have it where one's level of commitment will determine whether they are able to do certain things.
A Gentile who attends an Orthodox synagogue but does not convert is not a member of that community and while welcomed as a guest and friend, is not a member and therefore is limited in certain areas. This is not making the person second class.
Doesn't always play out that way, Q - and I'll go with the synagouges that've noted that often when it comes to Gentiles involved in synagouges who do not convert and yet are fully involved/immeshed and yet Gentile.
For Messianic Gentiles who attend a synagogue, should they convert, it is assumed they are renouncing Yeshua. So, the choice will be to be fully Jewish and a member of the Jewish community and renounce Jesus, or a Gentile who joins in with the Jewish community but not as a member of the community and maintaining belief and allegiance to Yeshua.

In the Reform movement, of course it is a bit different, as the Reform movement has a somewhat high level of mixed marriages, so a Gentile spouse will be more included so that they are more comfortable in a synagogue setting as their children of raised Jewish

Thankfully, in Messianic Jewish synagouges/services, it does not have to be the case that one has to be Jewish/made fully Jewish in order to be a member of the community and have access to things.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Well we have to put this in a 'Messianic' perspective.

In regards to salvation a Gentile doesn't need to convert. For Jews they are already Jewish and so are their males according to Gen 17.

I believe what we see in the scriptures is a sort of split of Jewish believers and Gentiles into a separate congregation because those that weren't believers said 'Gentiles must be circumcised to be saved'. In other words Gentiles had to convert to be saved.

So I believe there were separate 'churches' from the main stream synagogues where Jew and Gentile could be together as equal co heirs of the promise of Abraham that Jesus fulfilled. I do believe it was a community with separate identities but these indentures were one in Messiah.
Good points, as it concerns how in Yeshua things were meant to be played out differently. The type of Judaism that Yeshua preached was not one where the Gentiles in a fellowship of both Gentiles/Jews were not allowed to be leaders/in influence while the Jews were dominant - nor was it one where Gentiles were treated as non-members of the community due to not being Jewish.

There are other scholars with much valuable information who've also shared on the issue. For a good read on what Jesus may've held to, one book that may be a blessing to investigate is entitled "Jesus the Pharisee: A New Look at the Jewishness of Jesus" by Harvey Falk. He did an excellent job on discussing the reality of what has often been said in Judaism when it came to the Noahide Laws. To see snippets of his work, one can go online/research an article that can be found under the name of "Khirbet Qumran, the Essene Community along the Wadi Succacah near the Dead Sea -- The Essenes, the Hasidim and the Righteous Gentile of the Nations”"and here to Rabbi Harvey Falk defends “Jesus the Nazarene’s Mission to the Gentiles: Divine Mission to Bring the “Good News” to the Gentiles

For more review on the book, one can go here to Book Review: Jesus The Pharisee by Harvey Falk | Grasping Mashi'ach.

As that Messianic stated:






Although subtitled as a “New Look at the Jewishness of Jesus”, Rabbi Falk’s work is a reintroduction of Jacob Emden’s original thoughts expanded and applied to Jesus teachings based on various Talmudic and historic rabbinic texts. In the 1700’s Emden wrote favorably of Christianity by expressing his view that Jesus and Paul had acted completely within halacha in creating a religion for the Gentiles based on the Noahide Commandments while yet considering Jewish law eternally binding upon the Jew.

From this thesis of Rabbi Emden — long forgotten and disregarded by scholars in general (yet brought to attention again in Rudolph’s Paul’s Rule paper) — Falk goes on to weave a fascinating and intriguing picture of Jesus as a Pharisee in the first century CE world in which he lived. Each chapter presents intricate details of various Talmudic and rabbinic writings that the author uses to present Jesus as an adherent of the school of Hillel and member of the sect of the Essenes. In Falk’s view the debate of the Eighteen Measures between the school of Hillel and school of Shammai, in which numerous prophets of Hillel were killed, followed shortly after by the death of Hillel in 10 CE, resulted in Hillel’s disciples going “underground” by joining the sect of the Essenes. This allowed the house of Shammai to gain dominance until the close of the first century.

Falk presents Jesus mission as the establishment of a religion for the Gentiles based on the Noahide commandments, a mission presented in both the Talmud and Maimonides as something Moses obligated Israel to accomplish once they had gained a position of prominence as a nation. Because Israel had not gained such a position by the time of the first century CE the obligation never went into effect. Jesus, in spreading the knowledge of HaShem and the Noahide commandments to the Gentiles did so as a means of creating Hasidim of the Nations, by going beyond the letter of the halacha as given to Moses.
.
Time Magazine did an excellent review on the subject as well

The book by Harvey Faulk has truly been a blessing/good way to build dialouge between those who are Christians and Jews----as its often the case that both sides miss the Mark when trying to polarize. Of course, I don't agree with all of his conclusions. In example, I don't think he really grapples with those areas in which Jesus and the School of Hillel did most definitely part company---and for more, go here. Though I agree that Christ came to create something entirely new that would be inclusive to the Gentiles, there's the reality that Jesus often emphasized making certain that the Jews would come first in those he reached out to. This is seen, in example, when he gave the command to his twelve disciples to not "go in the way of the Gentiles or Samaritans," but instead to bring the gospel "to the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Matthew 10:5ff /Matthew 10:4-6 ) when ministry began.

Nonetheless, the ministry Christ brought was RADICALLY inclusive on multiple fronts - from his accepting of Samaritans as seen in John 4 to his work with the Gentiles in ministry and other points - and in Acts, we see that the churches which truly thrived were those which were multicultural - like Paul and Barnabas's in Acts 11. Monolithic fellowships did not seem to have the same strengths as others which were not homogenous.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

pat34lee

Messianic
Sep 13, 2011
11,293
2,637
59
Florida, USA
✟89,330.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Since the Talmudic passage was written by Yonathan ben Uziel, it has nothing to do with as you stated.

Uziel also wrote the Targum Jonathan, and that particular Targum interprets Isaiah 53, the suffering servant, as applying to the Messiah. So Uziel saw Isaiah 53 as a prophetic passage concerning the suffering of the Messiah.

At various times in Jewish history, there was a Messianic fervor. One time was during the Roman Empire, and there have been others. There was a fear among the leaders of Judaism, that should the Messiah not arrive as believed, the people would abandon belief in the Messiah. During Jesus time, and for the next 100 years, there were several people considered as possibilities.

I heard that as well, and it makes sense. Satan can count as well as we can, and he knows the scriptures. He knew when the Messiah was to come, and I would imagine he planted the seeds for many false messiahs around that time. Some just became known more widely than others, like bar Kosiba.

Some of the Pharisees admitted to the suffering servant prophecies, and had a time trying to reconcile Yeshua ben Yosef with Yeshua ben David. Some denied that the suffering servant could be Messiah. How could Messiah die and yet rule? Would there be two Messiahs, or more? That doesn't negate the fact that they were looking for a king Messiah at that time, which is one reason why Akiva backed bar Kosiba so quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: visionary
Upvote 0

Qnts2

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2012
1,323
111
✟2,056.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
I heard that as well, and it makes sense. Satan can count as well as we can, and he knows the scriptures. He knew when the Messiah was to come, and I would imagine he planted the seeds for many false messiahs around that time. Some just became known more widely than others, like bar Kosiba.

Some of the Pharisees admitted to the suffering servant prophecies, and had a time trying to reconcile Yeshua ben Yosef with Yeshua ben David. Some denied that the suffering servant could be Messiah. How could Messiah die and yet rule? Would there be two Messiahs, or more? That doesn't negate the fact that they were looking for a king Messiah at that time, which is one reason why Akiva backed bar Kosiba so quickly.

During the time of Bar Kockba, Akiva believed he was the messiah but many others strongly opposed Akiva on that.

Roman times for the Jewish people were bad times and as time went on, they became increasingly worse. So, the Jewish people were looking for relief and biblically, that relief was in the form of the conquering Messiah.
There have been other times in history, when the persecution was more severe that the people were looking for the relief the Messiah is to bring.

Similarly, Christians thru the years have periodically had end-times fervors expecting the return of Jesus. Times when things were not going well and other times are what some considered significant dates. During bad times, people are looking to be lifted up. The theology, manifest sons falls into this category, as does Dominion theology. And even Replacement theology.

And it is not just the religious. People in general, in bad times, look for someone to 'save' them. Along with this saving, they often look to feel better about themselves as the bad times result in people becoming depressed and negative about themselves. In the U.S., Obama was caste as a type of messiah and many thought he was going to do great things for them and all would be better. That was part of his first campaign, change for the better.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums