The Commonwealth of Israel to be added to the MJ Statement of Faith? (bis)

Qnts2

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2012
1,323
111
✟2,056.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Easy G (G²);61415819 said:
By the standards of how others understand Jewish heritage in Judaism today, Joseph's sons would not have been Jewish---and at that point, even as "Jewishness" is defined today in terms of Mosaic code, they would not have been in that category even if they were deemed "Jewish" since they were children of two cultures...with a father who emulated both cultures before his own family. There was a reason that their grand-father, Jacob, had to adopt to them into the family line. ..and at the point they were adopted into the tribe, they were deemed to be Jewish.

Without going any further into your post, how others understand Jewish heritage in Judaism in Jesus time and today, doesn't really matter. The understanding of Jewish heritage must be understood from a Jewish viewpoint. How do Jewish people understand who is Jewish. Historically, and today, Josephs sons are viewed as 100% Jewish. Not just in history but also in scripture since Josephs sons were called tribes of Israel and had inheritance rights as only Jewish people have. There are many Jewish writings which are quite old which talk about Josephs sons as Jewish, never ever Egyptian. (Consider, that only Jewish people/children of Israel could inherit land in the land of Israel. If a piece of land was sold to a non-Jew, the law required the land to be returned to the original Jewish owners on the year of Jubilee).

Often, non-Jews make a point of saying Ruth was not Jewish. But from a Jewish view which comes from scripture, Ruth, a convert, was Jewish. Had Ruth not been accepted as 100% Jewish, the law of marriage and the law of kinsman redeemer would not have been operative, yet it is those laws which Boaz, a righteous Jew appealed to. Since Ruth (and Boaz) was/were Jewish, all of her children were 100% Jewish by linage.

Again, in scripture, there is no such thing as half or a percent Jewish. Jewish people can only be 100% Jewish and once a person converts, they are 100% Jewish. Modern Jewish law forbids referring to a convert as anything other then 100% Jewish.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
If a person is Jewish, they are 100% Jewish. However, if a person has Jewish ancestors, which do not qualify them to be Jewish, then they are not Jewish at all. All that they can say is they have Jewish ancestors but are not Jewish themselves. On the other side if only one parent is Jewish (mother), then the child is 100% Jewish.

This kind of thinking is foreign to many cultures. .
The issue of Jewishness always seems to be complicated by many factors at times...paticularly whenever adoption comes into the picture. The issue of adoption within the Jewish culture seems to be a very hot-button issue nowadays. Be'chol Lashon did a good review on the issue recently which really brings many issues to the forefront, paticularly when ethnic issues are brought up. In their words, from the article they made entitled ""Be’chol Lashon: Media Center: In the News: June 28, 2000: Shades Of Gray: Multiracial families are growing rapidly and changing " ():
American Jewish families in which an adopted child or a converted parent is black, Asian, Hispanic or biracial constitute a rapidly growing population, say sociologists. "This is the changing face of American Jewry," said Rabbi Susan Silverman, who with her husband has two biological daughters and recently adopted a son who is black from an orphanage in Ethiopia.

The 1990 National Jewish Population Study - the last completed "census" of American Jewry - found that 6.5 percent of all respondents were nonwhite, said Gary Tobin, president of the Institute for Jewish and Community Research in San Francisco, and himself the adoptive father of a black child, Jonah.

Four percent of the study's core population - meaning Jews by birth or conversion - were black or Hispanic, he said, which equaled about 220,000 people.

A decade after the study, it's now possible that through adoption, adult conversion and intermarriage, the percentage of nonwhite Jews in America is as high as 10 percent, Tobin says.

Adoption is responsible for a large part of the surge. In years past most foreign babies adopted by Americans were born in Korea, Vietnam and Latin America. Americans - of all religions and ethnicities - continue to adopt children from those countries, but today, experts say, the former Soviet Union and China are the leading birth countries in international adoptions and are the source of 4,500 and 4,000 children, respectively.

And while domestic adoptions of children from black and Hispanic backgrounds were first seen in significant numbers in the early 1970s, they seem to be increasingly popular among Jewish parents today.

One adoption professional estimated that between 15 percent and 20 percent of the children currently being adopted into Jewish families are Hispanic or nonwhite.

The other doorway into the Jewish community is, of course, adult conversion, and their children, but it's not known how many people within that category are nonwhite, Tobin said, because that has never been measured.
 
Upvote 0

Qnts2

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2012
1,323
111
✟2,056.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Easy G (G²);61415815 said:
That all goes back to what was noted earlier when it came to the issue of how it often was a matter of LIFESTYLE that made a difference..paticularly in the case of others who chose to adapt to Judaism, convert/live out the life and have all of their children who were born later be deemed Jewish. Of course, from what other Jewish people have often noted, identifying with other people as apart of their ancestry isn't required in order to identify with Jewishness. Someone who's born with a Sephardic Jewish mother and a Mexican father doesn't say that they have to deny being Mexican in order to accept being Jewish.....although where their Mexican heritage calls them to do things that the Jewish religion would not allow, in order to live out the Jewish heritage, the Mexican side would have to lose.

This is no different than what was noted in Ezra 9-10 when intermarriage was occurring and the children from those marriages were NOT considered "Israelites"--but a differing category altogether....one which required for the Israelites to send their children off in divorce.
.​
A child of a Jewish mother and a Mexican Father is Jewish. (It really doesn't matter if the Jewish mother is Sephardic or Ashkenazi, or Mountain Jew, etc). 100% Jewish by linage. Unlike a convert, there is no need to deny or abandon a former practice and there is nothing wrong with being Mexican. I am not explaining this very well. Going back to biblical times, there surrounding cultures were pagan and worshipped false gods. So a person who was not Jewish was required to abandon their false religion and believe only in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The other factor is identifying with a people. If a non-Jew converts to Judaism, and becomes a Jew, there is also a needed committment to being a member of the Jewish people. Since at various times in history, the Jewish people are persecuted, when persecution comes, will the convert remain Jewish, or deny being Jewish, reclaiming their former people.

Something which is very unique about scripture, is that looks, such as hair or skin are mentioned, but races are not mentioned. While in Ashkenazi congregations, most will be European looking, white, so a darker skinned Jewish person might stand out, at the same time, an Askenazi Jew would stand out in other parts of the world of Jewry. Jewish people are blonds, red heads, brunettes and black hair, very fair skin to brown skin to yellow skin to black skin. And the majority are Jewish by linage. Until the last 30 or so years, the majority of Jewish people would not marry someone who was not Jewish, so for a marriage to occur, the non-Jewish person would convert. And all children would be Jewish by linage. What occurred during Ezra's time was that Jewish men married non-Jewish women who did not convert, but continued to worship pagan gods. That is what made the marriage illegal and the children non-Jewish. The mothers were not Jewish. They never converted.

I can remember thinking about Sammy Davis Jr, a convert to Judaism, and being the first black Jew I had heard of, I worried about the children, who were Jewish. Who would they marry? (Interracial marriage was not common at all at that time and faced a fair amount of persecution).
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
A child of a Jewish mother and a Mexican Father is Jewish. (It really doesn't matter if the Jewish mother is Sephardic or Ashkenazi, or Mountain Jew, etc). quote]
They're also Mexican, Q...and that's coming from the mouths of many who are Mexican Jews (just as there are others who are Nigerian Jews, Jamaican Jews, Indian Jews and others). Many have noted the ways it is racially offensive whenever others claim they're not able to identify with their ethnic backgrounds apart from the Jewish side and many in Judaism have long noted where such denial of ethnic heritage was never to occur in the first place.

One of the Messianic Jewish groups I love listening to----called Hazakim--spoke in-depth on the issue regarding how they were mixed and felt that many of the terms for "black" and "white" were often pitted against one another in ways that seem arbitrary at times...and discussing the discussions within Judaism as it concerns ethnic identity and acknowledging things in one's genes regardless of where they come from. For more, one can go online to their blog and investigate the article entitled A Multi-Cultural Perspective About "Race" in America And The Presidential Race in America. for more about them, one can go online/hear their story at their Record Label of "Lamp Mode", as seen in Lamp Mode Recordings » Hazakim Interview. As they themselves come from a mixed background, I was glad Hazakim mentioned what they did when it came to debate about whether the President was "Black" or "White" and how that reflects battles others go through daily...including Jewish people. A lot of people treat things like it was during the Jim Crow era with what was known as the "One Drop" rule where someone was considered to be "100 Black%" if they even had one percentage of black genes in their blood....for in their minds, one could no more be "part black" than they could be "partly pregnant". Of course, that's changed...but the same principle has evolved over the years in many respects when it comes to people doing similar today. For more on that issue, one can go here ..or they can go here to the following:

Some of these dynamics are similar to what I've witnessed when it comes to those within Jewish culture who come from a mixed heritage and yet feel that even they are forced to choose sides...especially as it concerns their having to be told what it means to be "Jewish" and yet still feeling as if their experience isn't really reflected in a place where they're not the majority....or the terms used to describe something have often changed to mean differently over time. Brother SHimshon, as noted earlier, shared more on that when it came to His Puerto Rican heritage and his being Jewish simultaneously...and people questioing him about his being Taino, Puerto Rican and Jewish..( #2#4 #35 #164 ). But as he well noted as it concerns the issue of how those not ethnically Hebrew were still seen as Israel:
Originally Posted by Shimshon
This mixed multitued of egyptians and hebrews were all Yisrael because they all followed by faith the Elohim of Yisrael. Or they would not be there. .
It's the lifestyle rather than the genetics alone that count...
100% Jewish by linage.
And 100% Mexican (or whatever else is in their background by lineage as well), based on what other Jews/Jewish groups have long noted on the issue.

Unlike a convert, there is no need to deny or abandon a former practice and there is nothing wrong with being Mexican. I am not explaining this very well. Going back to biblical times, there surrounding cultures were pagan and worshipped false gods. So a person who was not Jewish was required to abandon their false religion and believe only in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Religion and ethnicity are two different things altogether---and that's often where disconnect comes into things, as many Jewish scholars have noted how not all things Gentile were automatically equated to be "pagan"/"false god worship", especially when seeing the multiple ways the Lord used things from those cultures and implemented them into the culture of the Hebrews and how often the Lord never condemned things unique to aspects of cultures outside of the Hebrews. Where it went against the Lord's standards, that is where issue laid.
The other factor is identifying with a people. If a non-Jew converts to Judaism, and becomes a Jew, there is also a needed committment to being a member of the Jewish people. Since at various times in history, the Jewish people are persecuted, when persecution comes, will the convert remain Jewish, or deny being Jewish, reclaiming their former people
The logic of operating in fear is something many Jewish people have pointed out as hindering the Jewish community...paticularly when it comes to claiming others apart of the Jewish community can NEVER identify with things outside the Jewish community for fear that they'll reject it. That's not logical and there's a reason many Jews have noted how often Jews remained faithful to defending their Jewish brother/sisters and heritage while also working with Gentiles who helped them out---or acknowledging ethnic heritage apart from the Jewish people as a matter of truth.

Something which is very unique about scripture, is that looks, such as hair or skin are mentioned, but races are not mentioned.
Race is never mentioned, although ethnicity and ethnic issues are mentioned frequently..including ethnic clashes. Acts 6 being one of the greatest examples where certain Jews of one ethnic makeup were being overlooked by another.
While in Ashkenazi congregations, most will be European looking, white, so a darker skinned Jewish person might stand out, at the same time, an Askenazi Jew would stand out in other parts of the world of Jewry.
Indeed. Had this come up once when talking to someone I took a class with. She was from an Sephardic Jewish community and went to schools that were made up solely of that ethnic group--and she noted how often she was tired of others making it out as if they had to be fearful of other Jewish groups not like them. When I mentioned the issue of Indian Jews and how they've often been mistreated in Israel/other places by differing Jewish communities for "not looking Jewish", she was shocked...for although she knew of the ways that Jewish people in certain camps often seemed to be ethnocentric for their group, she had no idea that there was such a thing as Indian Jews. The same thing happened for other friends/family of mine who were Jewish and yet were mistreated on the basis of having ethnic ties to groups outside of what others were used to.....one of my friends being from Puerto Rico and finding out that her grandmother was Jewish and her father kept it a secret because he was so ashamed that the Jewish side was mixed with the Hispanic.
Jewish people are blonds, red heads, brunettes and black hair, very fair skin to brown skin to yellow skin to black skin. And the majority are Jewish by linage. Until the last 30 or so years, the majority of Jewish people would not marry someone who was not Jewish, so for a marriage to occur, the non-Jewish person would convert. And all children would be Jewish by linage.
There've actually been a lot of cases where Jewish people married others who were not Jewish--although in many cases over the centuries, the marriages were kept secret. The book "Color of Water" is an excellent read on the subject (more shared here in #25 when talking on Black Jews). The book discusses the story of Ruth McBride Jordan, the two good men she married, and the 12 good children she raised. Jordan, born Rachel Shilsky, a Polish Jew (and daughter of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi), immigrated to America soon after birth; as an adult she moved to New York City, leaving her family and faith behind in Virginia. Jordan met and married a black man, making her experience an isolation that was very profound. And it was interesting seeing her battles since many didn't consider her "Jewish" just as others didn't consider her "

What occurred during Ezra's time was that Jewish men married non-Jewish women who did not convert, but continued to worship pagan gods. That is what made the marriage illegal and the children non-Jewish. The mothers were not Jewish. They never converted.
Indeed. Nonetheless, the same parallel is present even with Joseph since there is absolutely no record that his wife was not apart of the Egyptian religion or religious system of the day. Only that she was given in marriage to Joseph by Pharoah and that she was a high priest 's daughter. Again, there's no record of the mother of Ephraim/Manasseah ever converting---just as there's no record of the wives of the priests coverting in Ezra 9-10. ..although it could have easily been the same reality and things evolved by the time it reached the scene with Ezra. With Ezra, the primary issue was one of worship practices rather than ethnicity alone....but the children themselves could have been adopted later if they wanted to convert.
I can remember thinking about Sammy Davis Jr, a convert to Judaism, and being the first black Jew I had heard of, I worried about the children, who were Jewish. Who would they marry? (Interracial marriage was not common at all at that time and faced a fair amount of persecution).
He (Sammy David Jr) seemed to do pretty well, from what I heard. Although many took issue with it just as they often do with biracial marriages, many adapt rather easily :)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Lulav

Y'shua is His Name
Aug 24, 2007
34,141
7,243
✟494,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Abraham did "replace" Isaac with the ram caught in the bush. I know many would maintain the position that Abraham obeyed the angel's voice when he did this; the angel told Abraham to not harm the boy, not to replace the sacrifice. In fact, "living sacrifices" were never bound or slain before being burned alive.
It specifically says this was a test. He was told to make a sacrifice. When Isaac asked where the lamb was for the sacrifice, Abraham's faith is clearly shown:

G-d himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering, my son

After the angel spoke to him, he looked up and saw the provision that he had trusted G-d to provide, a ram caught in the thicket.


Well the gentiles needed to understand the importance of circumcision, and how it should be performed in secret, not a public ceremony like baptism. Circumcision, although done outwardly, is a inward or personal matter of the heart. The law not only required outward circumcison but also circumcision of the heart. The Spirit compelled Abraham to become circumcised, circumcise Ishmael, all the male servants bought with Abraham's money; only Isaac living in Abraham's house would be circumcised on the 8th day, everlasting covenant was established in Isaac.
G-d made a covenant with Abraham and the circumcision was the cutting thereof. He was not 'compelled by the Spirit', but entered willingly into it, it was not Spiritual, but a physical covenant.

Many times salvation of Israel, meant deliverance from slavery or from her enemies. In other words, the natural application must be understood, before any spiritual revelation can be understood.
Exactly, that is what I said above.


There is certainly a difference between the sons of Abraham and the sons of Jacob, however they both belong to the family of Israel. Ishmael is Jacob's uncle. Ishmael was born the common way, Isaac was born by the power of the Spirit. Sarah has only one son; she was barren most of her life, probably because she was Abraham's sister or niece. Isaac should not have been born considering the circumstances.
Yet when the L-RD told Abraham to take his son and offer him as a burnt sacrifice, he called Isaac his only son.
Sarai was Abraham's half sister, that does not mean that is why she was barren. The L-RD made her that way so that Isaac would be born at the appointed time, as it says in Gen 18. It was a miracle on two accounts, one that she had not given Abraham children all this time, and two, that she was well past the time of child-bearing. So Isaac is like a miracle child.

Jacob was Rebekah's firstborn; although Esau came out the womb first. The blessings of the firstborn must always be given to the oldest son, not the son who leaves the womb first. Esau and Jacob were born about the same time, Ishmael was the firstborn from the bondservant, Isaac the firstborn from Sarah the free woman.
True, many do not understand this as the name of Jacob has been besmirched by calling him a usurper. I also think that Esau was akin to Cain.

We know that those who are free have more privledges than those living in bondage. Abraham did bind Isaac on the altar, then sought to kill him. The angel from heaven told Abraham to do Isaac no harm.
Not sure what you are saying here. Are you intimating that Isaac was in bondage on the altar?

"The elder shall teach the younger", Jacob taught Esau to serve. Abraham prayed for Ishmael, YHWH promised to bless Ishmael their uncle.
And by that, how did Ishmael teach his younger brother Issac?
 
Upvote 0

Qnts2

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2012
1,323
111
✟2,056.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Easy G (G²);61416368 said:
They're also Mexican, Q...and that's coming from the mouths of many who are Mexican Jews (just as there are others who are Nigerian Jews, Jamaican Jews, Indian Jews and others). Many have noted the ways it is racially offensive whenever others claim they're not able to identify with their ethnic backgrounds apart from the Jewish side and many in Judaism have long noted where such denial of ethnic heritage was never to occur in the first place.

One of the Messianic Jewish groups I love listening to----called Hazakim--spoke in-depth on the issue regarding how they were mixed and felt that many of the terms for "black" and "white" were often pitted against one another in ways that seem arbitrary at times...and discussing the discussions within Judaism as it concerns ethnic identity and acknowledging things in one's genes regardless of where they come from. For more, one can go online to their blog and investigate the article entitled A Multi-Cultural Perspective About "Race" in America And The Presidential Race in America. for more about them, one can go online/hear their story at their Record Label of "Lamp Mode", as seen in Lamp Mode Recordings » Hazakim Interview. As they themselves come from a mixed background, I was glad Hazakim mentioned what they did when it came to debate about whether the President was "Black" or "White" and how that reflects battles others go through daily...including Jewish people. A lot of people treat things like it was during the Jim Crow era with what was known as the "One Drop" rule where someone was considered to be "100 Black%" if they even had one percentage of black genes in their blood....for in their minds, one could no more be "part black" than they could be "partly pregnant". Of course, that's changed...but the same principle has evolved over the years in many respects when it comes to people doing similar today. For more on that issue, one can go here ..or they can go here to the following:

Some of these dynamics are similar to what I've witnessed when it comes to those within Jewish culture who come from a mixed heritage and yet feel that even they are forced to choose sides...especially as it concerns their having to be told what it means to be "Jewish" and yet still feeling as if their experience isn't really reflected in a place where they're not the majority....or the terms used to describe something have often changed to mean differently over time. Brother SHimshon, as noted earlier, shared more on that when it came to His Puerto Rican heritage and his being Jewish simultaneously...and people questioing him about his being Taino, Puerto Rican and Jewish..( #2#4 #35 #164 ). But as he well noted as it concerns the issue of how those not ethnically Hebrew were still seen as Israel:

I personally think you are arguing an entirely different topic.

Jewish people are scattered. So we grew up in different countries. As you noted, some in Puerto Rico. Some in Brazil. Some in Germany. Some in China. Some in Russia. Some in India. Some in South Africa. etc etc etc etc etc. Based on where we grew up, there are certain differences of food etc. And experiences. But, there is still the one rule. A person is either 100% Jewish, or not Jewish at all. That does not change based on whether a Jewish person's family is from Hungary, Australia, China, Iran, or the Congo, or Spain.

This really isn't like Jim Crow where 1 % black blood makes a person black. That was a judgement call from outside (white America) to subject people to the Jim Crow laws. (This is very similar to the laws today which decide whether a person is Native American based on percentage, but that thought process is not a Native American thought process.)

Instead the view I am presenting is a Jewish view, that a person is either Jewish, or Gentile. This is based on linage, not % of blood. It is not a view forced onto us but one which dates back to before Jesus. It is also a scriptural view. A person in scripture is either viewed as Jewish, or Gentile. The Mosaic laws are written to people who are either Jewish, Gentile and living in the land of Israel, or Gentile and living outside of the land of Israel. So whether a Puerto Rican Jew, or a Israeli Jew, or an American Jew, we are all 100% Jewish or not Jewish at all. Our Jewishness has nothing to do with the country we reside in. And that is biblical also. We are living scattered. Being scattered does not mean we lose our Jewishness. And whereever we live, we pick up some of the culture, and if treated relatively well, appreciate and enjoy the culture and country we live in. We support the countries we live in. I am a citizen of the U.S. This country has been good to the Jewish people.

But in all honesty, if a person says they are half Jewish, that is a sure sign, they are not Jewish. Or they were not really raised Jewish so haven't been educated in the Jewish way of seeing things if by chance they are Jewish by linage. (And by the way, this will become more of an issue in the next 20 years or so, as there are far more mixed marriages in Judaism for that last 20 years or so, where the non-Jewish spouse has not converted and remained non-Jewish so the children may or may not be raised in a Jewish fashion ).
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Caleb was not a gentile,

from the tribe of Judah, Caleb son of Jephunneh;
These are their names: Caleb son of Jephunneh, from the tribe of Judah;
Obvious is the fact that Caleb was considered apart of the Tribe of Judah. Nonetheless, that has absolutley nothing to do with his ancestry from Edom..

Again, for reference, the scriptures concerning Caleb being from Judah and a Kenezite:
Numbers 13:6 Of the tribe of Judah, Caleb the son of Jephunneh.

Numbers 32:12 Save Caleb the son of Jephunneh the Kenezite, and Joshua the son of Nun: for they have wholly followed the LORD.

Joshua 14:6 Then the children of Judah came unto Joshua in Gilgal: and Caleb the son of Jephunneh the Kenezite said unto him, Thou knowest the thing that the LORD said unto Moses the man of God concerning me and thee in Kadeshbarnea.

Joshua 14:14 Hebron therefore became the inheritance of Caleb the son of Jephunneh the Kenezite unto this day, because that he wholly followed the LORD God of Israel.
Concernin Genesis 36:1-42 (I Chronicles 1:51-54), with the geneology of Easu, His sons and grandsons produced 14 chiefs, and a number of kings emerged from among Esau's descendants. And among them there was an Edomite named Kenaz..as seen clearly in the geneology of Esau in Genesis 36:11
Genesis 36:11 And the sons of Eliphaz were Teman, Omar, Zepho, and Gatam, and Kenaz.

Genesis 36:15 These [were] dukes of the sons of Esau: the sons of Eliphaz the firstborn [son] of Esau; duke Teman, duke Omar, duke Zepho, duke Kenaz,

Genesis 36:42 Duke Kenaz, duke Teman, duke Mibzar,
1 Chr. 1:36 is another place to go for reference. But from the text, it seems that Kenaz was one of the sons of Eliphaz, the son of Esau. He became the chief of an Edomitish tribe (Gen. 36:11, 15, 42) and was a duke of Edom ( Gen. 36:42; 1 Chr. 1:53). From what the text seems to say, Kenaz was also the brother of Caleb ( Josh. 15:17; Judg. 1:13; 3:9, 11; 1 Chr. 4:13, Joshua 15:17, Judges 1:13, Judges 3:7-11). Specifically, he was Caleb's younger brother, and father of Othniel (Josh. 15:17), whose family was of importance in Israel down to the time of David (1 Chr. 27:15). There are some, of course, who think that Othniel (Judg. 1:13), and not Kenaz, was Caleb's brother. But that's another issue...

For the sake of clarity on what was noted before... in regards to Othiniel, some may wonder about the family connections and not be clear. From what I understand, he was Israel's first judge, who volunteered to lead an attack against a fortified city to gain more land (Judges 1:11-15). He had a rich spiritual heritage in Caleb since Caleb was his uncle and a man of unwavering faith in God (Numbers 13:30, Numbers 14:24). The text of scripture indicates that Othinel was the son of Kenaz, Caleb's younger brother
Judges 3:8-8

9 But when they cried out to the LORD, he raised up for them a deliverer, Othniel son of Kenaz, Caleb’s younger brother, who saved them. 10


Judges 1:11-15
12 And Caleb said, “I will give my daughter Aksah in marriage to the man who attacks and captures Kiriath Sepher.” 13 Othniel son of Kenaz, Caleb’s younger brother, took it; so Caleb gave his daughter Aksah to him in marriage.
Joshua 15:13-17
13 In accordance with the LORD’s command to him, Joshua gave to Caleb son of Jephunneh a portion in Judah—Kiriath Arba, that is, Hebron. (Arba was the forefather of Anak.) 14 From Hebron Caleb drove out the three Anakites—Sheshai, Ahiman and Talmai, the sons of Anak. 15 From there he marched against the people living in Debir (formerly called Kiriath Sepher). 16 And Caleb said, “I will give my daughter Aksah in marriage to the man who attacks and captures Kiriath Sepher.” 17 Othniel son of Kenaz, Caleb’s brother, took it; so Caleb gave his daughter Aksah to him in marriage




It seems reasonable to say that Caleb the Kenizzite was a member of the mixed multitude who was adopted into the tribe of Judah. I Chronicles 4:13 seems to speak more on this, in regards to the Kenizzites and how they appear to have been a southern tribe that was absorbed into Judah..and Caleb with Joshua was the only faithful man among the spies Moses sent to investigate Canaan. And Bezaleel---the principal craftsman for the tabernacle (Exodus 31:2, II Chronicles 1:5)---- was from Caleb according to 1 Chronicles 2:20.

But Caleb was an Edomite originally, due to his ancestry (Genesis 36:11). That may seem surprising to consider that, but there has already been precedent of God using others from other nations to aid Israel---such as with the Moabites (Deuteronomy 23:3-8 Numbers 22-25, Ezra 9:2-12, Ezra 10:44, Nehemiah 13:25, etc), descended from incest between Lot/His daughters ( Genesis 19:30-37 ) ---something scripture forbid in other parts of scripture (Leviticus 18:6-18, Leviticus 20:11, Leviticus 20:12-17, Leviticus 18:19-21, Deuteronomy 22:30, Deuteronomy 27:20-23, Ezekiel 22:11, I Corinthians 5:1). Moab and Benammi became the fathers of two of Israel's greatest enemies, the Moabites and the Ammonites....as these nations settled east of the Jordan River and Israel never conquered them. But Ruth hailed from that nation later became the great-grandmother of David, also being included in the Messianic Line (Ruth 1-4, Matthew 1:4-6)....and with God Himself making clear in Deuteronomy 2:8-11 and Deuteronomy 2:16-19 that he did not desire Israel to fight Moab/Ammon since God had given the land to Edom, Moab, and Ammon and forbid Israel to attempt taking that land, presumably because of the blood relationships between Esau and Lot.

All of this is said, again, in light of how the Edomites were Semites, closely related in blood and in language to the Israelites. They dispossessed the Horites of Mount Seir; though it is clear, from Gen. 36, that they afterwards intermarried with the conquered population. Edomite tribes settled also in the south of Judah, like the Kenizzites (Gen. 36:11), to whom Caleb and Othniel belonged (Josh. 15:17). The southern part of Edom was known as Teman.

All of that is said to further illustrate the reality of how much God loved/desired to use GENTILES to bless His people the Jews.....and within that, the Lord has often shown His heart in using those from camps that others would deem as "enemies"---yet the Lord is able to turn them into friends for His glory. As John Mark Ministries said best in their article entitled "Give Me This Mountain" :
Caleb is a living example of the old adage ‘If you can’t beat ‘em join ‘em.’ Apparently the Israelites picked up various groups and clans as they journeyed towards their Promised Land – one of these was Caleb’s. He was a Kenizzite, an Edomite, which means he was a descendent of Esau rather than Jacob, and he and his clan got assimilated into the tribe of Judah.

Despite his adverse pedigree Caleb, because of his outstanding leadership gifts, rose to a position of some prominence among the tribes of Israel. He refused to be ‘a prisoner of his scripting’.

..............
Caleb was smart: let us creatively take hold of the opportunities lying all
around us.


HE DID HIS RESEARCH. According to Deuteronomy 1:22, Moses was urging the people to go into the Promised Land and conquer it, claim it. God had told them over and over that he’d be with them, and the land was good (Exodus 3:8). But they did what many groups do who don’t want to do anything – they set up a committee to investigate: let’s send twelve spies into the land to search out the best route. Numbers 13 & 14 tell the story… The person chosen remarkably enough to represent the important tribe of Judah was this Gentile Caleb. Joshua and Caleb and ten others explored a land ‘flowing with milk and honey’. They brought back a bunch of grapes so huge it took two men to carry it. In the desert they’d probably never seen grapes. In their wildest imagination they hadn’t conceived of grapes like these. But there were two problems – giants, and the walled cities they lived in. So the committee was divided ten to two. Ten of the spies measured the giants against themselves: we can’t do it, they said, they are stronger than we are. We’re like grasshoppers compared to them. The spies went to Hebron, the very place where Abraham received the promise of the land of Canaan (Genesis 13:18). But all the promises of God to their great forefather, the power that God has displayed so many miraculous times, were all forgotten as they saw those high walls and those giants.

Two – one of them Caleb – measured the giants against God. To a great God those giants were very puny. Caleb was prepared to do what leaders are supposed to do – lead.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I personally think you are arguing an entirely different topic.
.
Personally, I think you're missing the topic being argued by making a false scenario that not all Jews agree with (as it concerns the issue of being Gentile in ancestry and yet consider Jewish while acknowledging the Gentile background). It's no different than someone seeing another who's a Nigerian Jew and acknowleding Nigerian culture present while seeing their Jewishness as well. People studying the Ibos of Nigeria, Nigerians of Jewish orgin are fascinating people. in the ways their Jewish culture has been shaped/developed within a Nigerian context....and seeing how they go about things...but in seeing themselves as Jewish, they don't claim they're not Nigerian. The same has occurred for many other Jewish groups in differing areas.

fascinating people


Jewish people are scattered. So we grew up in different countries. As you noted, some in Puerto Rico. Some in Brazil. Some in Germany. Some in China. Some in Russia. Some in India. Some in South Africa. etc etc etc etc etc. Based on where we grew up, there are certain differences of food etc. And experiences. But, there is still the one rule. A person is either 100% Jewish, or not Jewish at all.
Not according to many of the Jewish people scattered--seeing how they've often noted where they're 100% Jewish in their lifestyle (as it concerns the Torah/admonitions) and yet proud of other parts of their ethnic heritage....be it being thankful to be connected to Brazil or China and a number of other nations.
This really isn't like Jim Crow where 1 % black blood makes a person black. That was a judgement call from outside (white America) to subject people to the Jim Crow laws. (This is very similar to the laws today which decide whether a person is Native American based on percentage, but that thought process is not a Native American thought process.)
The principle I'd see as the same is the issue of identification where one is NOT ALLOWED (according to others) to identify with others outside of one group if (according to others) they want to identify with the group they're apart of. The same battle occurs all the time for biracial people, as it concerns people saying "You can't be white!!! You have a black parent!!" or other blacks saying that one isn't "black enough" due to noting where they appreciate aspects of their white heritage....and as other Jewish members/groups have often pointed that out as being far from Jewish when seeing the scriptures, I take that seriously.
a person is either Jewish, or Gentile.
False scenario, IMHO---as the real issue is whether one is Jewish with Gentile roots (in the event that were either adopted or had a Gentile parent involved)...or if they're Gentile with Jewish roots (as it concerns a Gentile with Jewish ancestry that was either forgotten or ignored because they don't want to identify as a Jew)---and within both is the issue of lifestyle that makes the difference since in God's Kingdom identification with Israel was never based on genetics alone. Going directly in line with what Paul (as said earlier) noted when stating " It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel" ( Romans 9:5 )

This is based on linage, not % of blood.
That can be semantical, in light of the fact of how often others who had Jewish in their blood were deemed to "not be Jewish" by others even though their lineage involved such and they were dismissed because of the mixed background they had.

Dr.Michael Brown did an excellent review on the subject not too long ago in his article entitled Who is a Jew? - Questions of Ethnicity Religion and Identity
It is not a view forced onto us but one which dates back to before Jesus. It is also a scriptural view. A person in scripture is either viewed as Jewish, or Gentile.
Anytime a person in scripture was viewed as Jewish (or Israelite or Hebrew), it was never divorced from seeing the background they had as it concerns possible Gentile roots...and Christ/the early Jewish Church often noted such on many occassions. That also went for others who lived Jewish as it concerns the lifestyle/heart of things--something Paul noted in Romans 2.
The Mosaic laws are written to people who are either Jewish, Gentile and living in the land of Israel, or Gentile and living outside of the land of Israel. So whether a Puerto Rican Jew, or a Israeli Jew, or an American Jew, we are all 100% Jewish or not Jewish at all.
No one has said anything at any point about people not being 100% Jewish. There is simply the reality, as many Jews have ntoed that one is also 100% apart of other cultures in their blood as well...and no contradiction with that anymore than it's wrong to say Christ was 100% Man and 100% God


Our Jewishness has nothing to do with the country we reside in. And that is biblical also.
Seeing what other Jews have noted when it comes to the country of origin/residence impacting practices and contexualization, Jewishness has a lot to do with it. One of the reasons why Jew, be it Messianics or Non-Messianics, have noted the importance of seeing Jewish practice from a global perspecticeW.

One prominent group beingBe'chol Lashon | Advocating for the Growth and Diversity of the Jewish People and another beingJews of Color - The Jewish Channel -- Connect With Your Culture Jews of Color Celebrate Jewish Diversity |and Welcoming Jews of Color | Jewlicious


Being scattered does not mean we lose our Jewishness. And whereever we live, we pick up some of the culture, and if treated relatively well, appreciate and enjoy the culture and country we live in. We support the countries we live in. I am a citizen of the U.S. This country has been good to the Jewish people.
Indeed..:)
But in all honesty, if a person says they are half Jewish, that is a sure sign, they are not Jewish.

Or they were not really raised Jewish so haven't been educated in the Jewish way of seeing things if by chance they are Jewish by linage.
Disagree--as that type of thinking is often reflective in many of the stereotypes people give on others...like assuming someone isn't really Irish the moment they note they're Half Irish while being Half-Dominican as well. Talked to way too many Jews to see it be the case that people are someone not "Jewish" because they note where they have one side of their ancestry/parent not be Jewish. They go to synagouge, practice Torah and many other things. TO claim that they're somehow not raised Jewish is really based more so on assuming what is Jewish according to one camp within Judaism that assumes that the only "Jewish" way of seein things is divorcing themselves from other cultures...and that's really cultural isolation.

(And by the way, this will become more of an issue in the next 20 years or so, as there are far more mixed marriages in Judaism for that last 20 years or so, where the non-Jewish spouse has not converted and remained non-Jewish so the children may or may not be raised in a Jewish fashion )
It's already an issue now and a big one. One of the reasons there has been more discussion on multiculturalism in Judaism.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Qnts2

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2012
1,323
111
✟2,056.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Easy G (G²);61416738 said:
Personally, I think you're missing the topic being argued by making a false scenario that not all Jews agree with (as it concerns the issue of being Gentile in ancestry and yet consider Jewish while acknowledging the Gentile background). It's no different than someone seeing another who's a Nigerian Jew and acknowleding Nigerian culture present while seeing their Jewishness as well. People studying the Ibos of Nigeria, Nigerians of Jewish orgin are fascinating people in the ways their Jewish culture has been shaped/developed within a Nigerian context....and seeing how they go about things...but in seeing themselves as Jewish, they don't claim they're not Nigerian. The same has occurred for many other Jewish groups in differing areas.


Not according to many of the Jewish people scattered--seeing how they've often noted where they're 100% Jewish in their lifestyle (as it concerns the Torah/admonitions) and yet proud of other parts of their ethnic heritage....be it being thankful to be connected to Brazil or China and a number of other nations.

But this has nothing to do with the country a Jewish person lives in. Because a Jewish person has lived in Nigeria, does not change that they are 100% Jewish. Or that there are Nigerians who are not Jewish.

Again, Jewish people are scattered and live in a lot of different countries.

Let me try a different approach. A Japanese person who lives in the U.S. picks up the U.S. culture. They become culturally more like other people in the U.S. They are citizens or become citizens of the U.S. but they are still 100% Japanese.

Unlike being Japanese, where a person can be 50% Japanese, in the Jewish culture, a person is not 50% Jewish. You either are Jewish or not Jewish. The Jewish people in Babylon were influenced by the Babylonian culture and language. But they were still 100% Jewish. They were Babylonian Jews. Meaning they lived in Babylon, and were Jews living in Babylon.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
But this has nothing to do with the country a Jewish person lives in. Because a Jewish person has lived in Nigeria, does not change that they are 100% Jewish. Or that there are Nigerians who are not Jewish.
.
Incorrect, IMHO, as the fact that they see themselves as Jewish doesn't mean that they don't see themselves as Nigerian in other aspects of their culture/heritage....and again, numerous Jews/Jewish organizations have noted that for ages. Obvious is the fact that not all Nigerians are Jewish--but that would not have anything to do with the fact that there are Nigerians who are Jewish and noting their Nigerian culture.

It's not as if claiming to be 100% Jewish means you're not 100% of something else as well. You simply are.. all of it making up what you have inside you. That was present within OT culture with many coming from Gentile backgrounds and being included in the Jewish community while it was still known that their background (as recorded in geneologies/stories) was not always a Jewish one nor was it the case hat they didn't have aspects of the previous culture apart of who they are. Where it diverged from what Jewish culture accepted (like coming from a culture allowing for eating pork and then becoming Jewish), it was rejected.

As said before, Dr.Michael Brown did an excellent review on the subject not too long ago in his article entitled Who is a Jew? - Questions of Ethnicity Religion and Identity . And for others, one prominent group beingBe'chol Lashon | Advocating for the Growth and Diversity of the Jewish People and another beingJews of Color - The Jewish Channel -- Connect With Your Culture Jews of Color Celebrate Jewish Diversity |and Welcoming Jews of Color | Jewlicious as well as Memoirs of a Jewminicana


Jews often have had to do a lot of battle over in the Middle East when it comes to being mixed with Jewish/Arab heritage, with them being proud to acknowledge BOTH cultures apart of their ancestry.





Again, Jewish people are scattered and live in a lot of different countries.

Let me try a different approach. A Japanese person who lives in the U.S. picks up the U.S. culture. They become culturally more like other people in the U.S. They are citizens or become citizens of the U.S. but they are still 100% Japanese. Unlike being Japanese, where a person can be 50% Japanese, in the Jewish culture, a person is not 50% Jewish. You either are Jewish or not Jewish The Jewish people in Babylon were influenced by the Babylonian culture and language. But they were still 100% Jewish. They were Babylonian Jews. Meaning they lived in Babylon, and were Jews living in Babylon
No different than someone who is Jewish living in Hispanic culture with Hispanic ancestry. Their acknowledgement of Hispanic culture/ancestry in them doesn't take away from the fact that they are Jewish and have a right to be seen as Jews....but there'd be nothing wrong with identifying them as Hispanic Jews. They're Jewish and also Hispanic...not 100% Jewish and 0% Hispanic (as it concerns roots, ancestry and culture)..and to acknowledge the Hispanic roots/influences doesn't mean that they ceased being Jewish, just as it was in scripture with Jews scattered around the world (Acts 2 being the best example) and speaking differing languages but being united in being Hebrews for the Messiah.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mercy1061

Newbie
Nov 26, 2011
2,646
123
✟18,724.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
It specifically says this was a test. He was told to make a sacrifice. When Isaac asked where the lamb was for the sacrifice, Abraham's faith is clearly shown:



After the angel spoke to him, he looked up and saw the provision that he had trusted G-d to provide, a ram caught in the thicket.
Abraham failed this test miserably. This was a "human offering", the offering up of his only son, although we know that Abraham had another son from another mother. Abraham offered up Isaac like a animal sacrifice. It is clearly shown from their conversation, and method of sacrifice, that Abraham always intended on sacrificing a lamb. YHWH need not provide an offering, since YHWH already provided Isaac. Abraham desired for YHWH to provide another sacrifice to replace his only son. So Abraham sought to kill Isaac, like he was a innocent lamb. The angel from heaven told Abraham to not harm the boy.

G-d made a covenant with Abraham and the circumcision was the cutting thereof. He was not 'compelled by the Spirit', but entered willingly into it, it was not Spiritual, but a physical covenant.

Since God is Spirit, the Spirit told Abraham to circumcise every male in his household.

Exactly, that is what I said above.


Yet when the L-RD told Abraham to take his son and offer him as a burnt sacrifice, he called Isaac his only son.

Isaac was the only son that YHWH promised him, only son born from his sister or niece Sarah. Isaac would be required to be offered up on the altar of fire. The angel that appeared to Samson's mother, was not bound or killed, but freely appeared to her at the altar in fire.

Sarai was Abraham's half sister, that does not mean that is why she was barren. The L-RD made her that way so that Isaac would be born at the appointed time, as it says in Gen 18. It was a miracle on two accounts, one that she had not given Abraham children all this time, and two, that she was well past the time of child-bearing. So Isaac is like a miracle child.

The law of Moses forbid the marriage between close relatives. When Abraham told the king that she was his sister, the king naturally presumed that she was not his wife. So even in those days it was "uncommon" or "unlawful" for close relatives to marry and bear children.

True, many do not understand this as the name of Jacob has been besmirched by calling him a usurper. I also think that Esau was akin to Cain.

Cain was older than Abel, they were born at different times. Jacob and Esau were born at the same time, also twins, so a distinction between them had to be made, "the elder shall serve the younger". YHWH has always maintained that he knew Jeremiah while he was living inside his mother's womb. Jeremiah was sanctified before he came out of his mother's womb (Jer 1:5). The son that was formed first inside Rebekah's womb, might be called the eldest son. YHWH calls Jacob his firstborn, the eldest son, the son formed first inside his mother's womb. We know Adam was formed first, then Eve, but Eve is called the mother of all the living. The first Adam came first, then the second Adam, the natural man came first, then the spiritual.

Not sure what you are saying here. Are you intimating that Isaac was in bondage on the altar?

Yes, Abraham did bind Isaac on the altar, ready to be slain like a innocent lamb. According to Paul, we must offer our bodies as "living sacrifices", not dead bodies tied up on the altar. Our bodies should be offered to YHWH like the three hebrew boys were offered into the fiery furnace, they were thrown into fire as free hebrew sons. Moses saw the "burning bush", the bush was not bound, but the tree was living freely in fire.

And by that, how did Ishmael teach his younger brother Issac?

Isaac and Ishamel were not twins, and they have different mothers, they were born at different times from different mothers. Therefore the rules for slaves are different than the rules for those that are free. Jacob and Esau have the same mother, born around the same time.
 
Upvote 0

mercy1061

Newbie
Nov 26, 2011
2,646
123
✟18,724.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
As it concerns the practice of circumcision, much of its importance can be seen clearly when studying the context of what occurred with Moses when he failed to circumcise his children, as seen in Exodus 4:25-27. To the best of my understanding, Moses was the most humble man on the earth ( Numbers 12:2-4, Hebrews 11:23-25, etc )..yet God was about to kill Moses had he not circumcised his son......and he may not have been too familar with God's laws, especially the requirements of God's covenant with Israel in Genesis 17 that had not been carried out for over 400years. And Moses could not actively function as deliverer of God's people until he had fulfilled the conditions of God's covenant....and one of those conditions was circumcision.
Moses still did not circumcise his son, yet Moses lived, when Zipporah his wife circumcised his son and cast the foreskin or blood from circumcision at Moses feet. The law does not condemn a man for not circumcising his son, the law condemns the man that refuses to become circumcised. This is why it is important for the man to become circumcised on the 8th day by his father. Moses refused to circumcise his son, the pharisees shrewdly tell the gentiles to follow Moses example concerning circumcision. Moses refused to circumcise his son, this may show some defficiency in himself (we do not know when or if Moses was ever circumcised, we do know he probably was not circumcised on the 8th day by his father keeping the custom passed down from Abraham), we do know the "blood" of his son circumcision was cast at his feet, this for some strange reason caused YHWH to repent. Moses had a "near death" experience, when YHWH was about to kill him. Maybe the pharisees desire for Israel to be strengthended; the gentiles destroyed, like Egypt's army perished in the Red Sea. Moses became famous for destroying his enemies, not for circumcision. It is interesting how the pharisees whom Yeshua called children of the devil, "pair" Moses with circumcision, they even credit the law of circumcision to Moses when speaking about the gentiles.

We know the law of circumcision did not begin with Moses, but with the forefathers. Yeshua even says that circumcision did not come from Moses.

John 7
21 Yeshua answered them, “I did one thing; and because of this, all of you are amazed. 22 Moshe gave you b’rit-milah — not that it came from Moshe but from the Patriarchs — and you do a boy’s b’rit-milah on Shabbat. 23 If a boy is circumcised on Shabbat so that the Torah of Moshe will not be broken, why are you angry with me because I made a man’s whole body well on Shabbat?

What does Yeshua mean when he says that circumcision did not come from Moses? If circumcision did not in fact come from Moses, why are the pharisees calling circumcision the law from Moses when refering to the gentiles? Why not call circumcision on the 8th day the law of Abraham?

I wish many could discern the pharisees wickedness in their instruction to the gentiles. Pharisee Shaul desires for the gentiles to become circumcised on the 8th day according to the law of Abraham or like he secretly circumcised Timothy, not circumcised in the way of Moses.

Yeshua even says that in order for a man to be called a son of Abraham, he must do the works of Abraham; Abraham circumcised every living male in his household.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

yedida

Ruth Messianic, joining Israel, Na'aseh v'nishma!
Oct 6, 2010
9,779
1,461
Elyria, OH
✟25,205.00
Faith
Marital Status
In Relationship
Moses still did not circumcise his son, yet Moses lived, when Zipporah his wife circumcised his son and cast the foreskin or blood from circumcision at Moses feet. The law does not condemn a man for not circumcising his son, the law condemns the man that refuses to become circumcised. This is why it is important for the man to become circumcised on the 8th day by his father. Moses refused to circumcise his son, the pharisees shrewdly tell the gentiles to follow Moses example concerning circumcision. Moses refused to circumcise his son, this may show some defficiency in himself (we do not know when or if Moses was ever circumcised, we do know he probably was not circumcised on the 8th day by his father keeping the custom passed down from Abraham), but we do know the "blood" of his son circumcision was cast at his feet, this for some strange reason caused YHWH to repent. Moses had a "near death" experience, when YHWH was about to kill him. Maybe the pharisees desire for Israel to be strengthended; the gentiles destroyed, like Egypt's army perished in the Red Sea. Moses became famous for destroying his enemies, not for circumcision. It is interesting how the pharisees whom Yeshua called children of the devil, "pair" Moses with circumcision, they even credit the law of circumcision to Moses when speaking about the gentiles.

We know the law of circumcision did not begin with Moses, but with the forefathers.

If Moses was not circumcised, how did the pharoah's daughter know immediately that he was a Hebrew baby? Why would she not just assume that he was "some" baby whose mother couldn't keep him for some reason?
 
Upvote 0

visionary

Your God is my God... Ruth said, so say I.
Site Supporter
Mar 25, 2004
56,925
8,040
✟575,802.44
Faith
Messianic
If Moses was not circumcised, how did the pharoah's daughter know immediately that he was a Hebrew baby? Why would she not just assume that he was "some" baby whose mother couldn't keep him for some reason?
And here I thought it was the baby blanket that gave away the baby's heritage...lol... That is the movies version..:p and I am sticking too it... lol:D
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Qnts2

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2012
1,323
111
✟2,056.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Easy G (G²);61416859 said:
Incorrect, IMHO, as the fact that they see themselves as Jewish doesn't mean that they don't see themselves as Nigerian in other aspects of their culture/heritage....and again, numerous Jews/Jewish organizations have noted that for ages. Obvious is the fact that not all Nigerians are Jewish--but that would not have anything to do with the fact that there are Nigerians who are Jewish and noting their Nigerian culture.

It's not as if claiming to be 100% Jewish means you're not 100% of something else as well. You simply are.. all of it making up what you have inside you. That was present within OT culture with many coming from Gentile backgrounds and being included in the Jewish community while it was still known that their background (as recorded in geneologies/stories) was not always a Jewish one nor was it the case hat they didn't have aspects of the previous culture apart of who they are. Where it diverged from what Jewish culture accepted (like coming from a culture allowing for eating pork and then becoming Jewish), it was rejected.

As said before, Dr.Michael Brown did an excellent review on the subject not too long ago in his article entitled Who is a Jew? - Questions of Ethnicity Religion and Identity . And for others, one prominent group beingBe'chol Lashon | Advocating for the Growth and Diversity of the Jewish People and another beingJews of Color - The Jewish Channel -- Connect With Your Culture Jews of Color Celebrate Jewish Diversity |and Welcoming Jews of Color | Jewlicious


Jews often have had to do a lot of battle over in the Middle East when it comes to being mixed with Jewish/Arab heritage, with them being proud to acknowledge BOTH cultures apart of their ancestry.





No different than someone who is Jewish living in Hispanic culture with Hispanic ancestry. Their acknowledgement of Hispanic culture/ancestry in them doesn't take away from the fact that they are Jewish and have a right to be seen as Jews....but there'd be nothing wrong with identifying them as Hispanic Jews. They're Jewish and also Hispanic...not 100% Jewish and 0% Hispanic (as it concerns roots, ancestry and culture)..and to acknowledge the Hispanic roots/influences doesn't mean that they ceased being Jewish, just as it was in scripture with Jews scattered around the world (Acts 2 being the best example) and speaking differing languages but being united in being Hebrews for the Messiah.

I will say that you are now saying that Jewish people are 100% Jewish, as there is no such thing as half Jewish. You either are or aren't. And that is my point, irregardless of what country you have lived in, in the diaspora.

My family lived in Russia. They escaped to the U.S., both my mothers and fathers family escaped to the U.S. Both sides have exciting and/or interesting stories. Russian Jews, those who escaped before the Communists shut the country, did have a Russian Jewish culture. Because of being Jewish, the Russian Jewish culture differed from a Russian culture while they lived in Russia. In the U.S., the Russian Jews had some differences from the German Jews, or the Spanish Jews, but also some things in common, even though the countries we lived in were different. Jewish people, living in their host countries still live a slightly unique and different lifestyle then the surrounding people. They live to some extent a Jewish lifestyle, even while engaging in certain cultural activities of the host country. Russian Jews eat Borsht which also spread to other Jewish populations in the U.S. Some Spanish Jews eat Dandelion soup.

As far as the articles, the one by Michael Brown is essentially answering the question or challenge by those who do not like Messianic Jews and say we are no longer Jewish. I have had to answer the same question when challenged by mainly anti-missionaries or those who are upset with me for saying Yeshua is the Jewish Messiah.

The other articles are discussing the return of various scattered Jewish groups, and how diverse we are having been influenced by the countries we have lived in in diaspora. Two articles talk about what they call Jews of color. Which again is an article about the diversity of Jews returning from the various countries. (Some would say my looks, skin and hair, are closer to a middle eastern look, although not entirely.) The universal factor is that all of the people are Jewish (100%) and are returning to the land of Israel. In Israel, the Chinese Jews probably live in proximity to each other, as the Nigerian Jews and Ethiopian Jews, and there is probably India Jews neighborhoods (Bene Israel) and Cochin Jews. I know years ago, there were Ashkenazi and Sephardic neighborhoods. (My next door neighbors years back, were an Ashkenazi wife and Sephardic husband, from Israel, in the U.S. going to college. Back then an Ashenazi/Sephardic marriage was more unusual in Israel). Each time a scattered group of Jewish people start to return, they bring with them, something unique and maybe surprising to the rest of us. But, this diversity is not something new. We always knew we were diverse. I knew about Chinese Jews when I was a child and my father tried to assist the Chinese Jewish people when he was in the army.

And even stranger story. I went to a public school. The neighborhoods served by that school system were 80 - 90% Jewish, so the student body was 80-90% Jewish. Most of the teachers were Jewish, but not all. In a social studies class, the teacher wanted to discuss prejudice and asked us about our views on black/white relations. My answer, I would not marry someone black or white, unless they were Jewish.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I will say that you are now saying that Jewish people are 100% Jewish, as there is no such thing as half Jewish. You either are or aren't. And that is my point, irregardless of what country you have lived in
You're point is understood, although I've already noted multiple times already that Jewish people are 100% Jewish and you either missed where it was said---or misunderstood what was being conveyed in the first place. In the event I wasn't explaining it clearly enough, my apologies...but as said before, being 100% Jewish doesn't mean you're also not 100% something else as well...just as Christ was 100% God and 100% man simultaneously. Other Jewish people have noted where they're both Arab and Jewish or Jamaican and Jewish and it was never seen as if they didn't have the right to be deemed "Jewish" because they acknowledged the other parts of their ethnic heritage.
My family lived in Russia. They escaped to the U.S., both my mothers and fathers family escaped to the U.S. Both sides have exciting and/or interesting stories. Russian Jews, those who escaped before the Communists shut the country, did have a Russian Jewish culture. Because of being Jewish, the Russian Jewish culture differed from a Russian culture while they lived in Russia. In the U.S., the Russian Jews had some differences from the German Jews, or the Spanish Jews, but also some things in common, even though the countries we lived in were different. Jewish people, living in their host countries still live a slightly unique and different lifestyle then the surrounding people. They live to some extent a Jewish lifestyle, even while engaging in certain cultural activities of the host country. Russian Jews eat Borsht which also spread to other Jewish populations in the U.S. Some Spanish Jews eat Dandelion soup.
Thank you for sharing the story of your family history as it concerns Russian Jews :) I know you've shared it before ( #23 ) but it's always good to bring up when it comes to seeing the journeys others have taken to be who they are. Russian Jews are a very fascinating culture and I had to study the subject once before when doing study on the subject of Russian culture/the groups within it. It is always fascinating to see the ways Russian Jews have operated and the methodologies utilized for survivial when it comes to mainting unique lifestyles and having cultural contexualization with their host cultures simultaneously.

Sister MessianicMommy has lived life with others who are Russian Jews (as well as German Jews) due to her experiences of life abroad in Germany and we talked on the issue before in-depth on the ways that Messianic fellowships for Russian Jews are radically different than other Jewish groups (more shared #63 , #67 , #68 , #117, #118 and #120 ), be it in language or strategies used for survival or even the ways worship is done via dance/song. The ways many Russian Jews have also adapted as it concerns their relationship with things within Russia (and outside of it) like the Russian Orthodox Church (or Orthodoxy in general) is also an interesting study and I'm thankful for the many Jewish believers addressing it from their experiences (more shared here, here, here, here, here, here , here , here , here , here , here, here , here , here, here , here, here, here and here at Jewish and Christian - Reocities if knowing of Fr. A. James Bernstein , who was one apart of Orthodox Judaism but joined Orthodoxy).

As far as the articles, the one by Michael Brown is essentially answering the question or challenge by those who do not like Messianic Jews and say we are no longer Jewish. I have had to answer the same question when challenged by mainly anti-missionaries or those who are upset with me for saying Yeshua is the Jewish Messiah.
Sad to see how often people must do battle with other non-believing Jews who refuse to acknowledge others as being Jewish due to their faith in Yeshua. As mentioned earlier, some of my friends from my Messianic fellowship actually wanted to go to Israel to take aliyah but they were not allowed into the country due to their faith in Yeshua. The standards set have made things extremely difficult for Messianics and it's a pity (more here, here and here), although others have noted where efforts to make aliyah accesible for Messianics have been bearing fruit ( here/ here ).
The other articles are discussing the return of various scattered Jewish groups, and how diverse we are having been influenced by the countries we have lived in in diaspora. Two articles talk about what they call Jews of color. Which again is an article about the diversity of Jews returning from the various countries. (Some would say my looks, skin and hair, are closer to a middle eastern look, although not entirely.) The universal factor is that all of the people are Jewish (100%) and are returning to the land of Israel. In Israel, the Chinese Jews probably live in proximity to each other, as the Nigerian Jews and Ethiopian Jews, and there is probably India Jews neighborhoods (Bene Israel) and Cochin Jews.
The aspect of being united in Jewish heritage, regardless of whatever other cultural backgrounds or ethnic inheritances one has, is always the beautiful aspect of how Jews are united around the world. Even at the times when Jews of one culture may not view Jews of another culturally favorably (or may not even deem them to be what they think being Jewish is about). A lot of them, to be clear, have not been for returning to the land of Israel due to differing views on what Israel truly is and what is needed in the land for it to be stable....some of them having the mindset that many Orthodox Jews have who see the Israeli state as corrupt/set up by the hand of man apart from God's design (like the Neturei Karta, more shared here in #24 /#30 ) while others see it as something needed to be reformed greatly in order for true peace to occur....and others who are content where they are and who've never felt the need to move back.

In regards to Chinese Jews, some live in proximity with one another while others do not (more shared here in #304 /#303 )...some choosing to go back to Israel whereas others don't. With others such as Cochin Jews/Bene Israel, others have often had some negative experiences in Israel (especially as it concerns many Jewish groups upset over how many accept polygamy still as did others in the OT..more here in #2, #4/ #12 /#13 , here , here /here and and work by one Jewish organization entitled Tracking the Migration of Indian Jews to Israel )---and not all Indian Jewish communities are on the same page in India. The Ethiopia Jews have very tight-knit communities....and they've been more intergrated than most in Israel, although there's still A LOT of discrimination against them in the land when it comes to jobs/resources allocated and it has caused a lot of outrage on the matter (more here in #5 ).
I know years ago, there were Ashkenazi and Sephardic neighborhoods. (My next door neighbors years back, were an Ashkenazi wife and Sephardic husband, from Israel, in the U.S. going to college. Back then an Ashenazi/Sephardic marriage was more unusual in Israel).
Cool to know. Due to a lot of the battles that've gone on between Sephardic and Ashkenazi, many have been of the mindset that the two shouldn't mix....and that's said especially in Israel where many Sephardic felt the Ashkenazi (who held a majority on education since they were the main type of Jews who originally came to Israel in its foundation) were trying to control how Sephardic children are educated. More shared here in the thread entitled Home-School, Private and State: Sefardi Jews Fighting for Rights to Teach their own. For those who were Ashkenazi/Sephardic mix long before it was not considered odd, it has always been a bit of a different world. Historically, there were many times the two groups mixed together (more here and here).

Each time a scattered group of Jewish people start to return, they bring with them, something unique and maybe surprising to the rest of us. But, this diversity is not something new. We always knew we were diverse. I knew about Chinese Jews when I was a child and my father tried to assist the Chinese Jewish people when he was in the army.
As it concerns diversity, it's not necessarily the case that all are aware of the diversity or desiring it. There are many who never even considered that there was such a thing as Chinese Jews (or Indian Jews..or even Black Jews, as shared here) since their main realm of experience led them to believe that only European Jews were truly within the imagery of being Jewish....and for many Jews, there's a reason there has been repeated notice of the ways other Jews felt discriminated against by their own who often said they were either not "Jewish enough" or outright said they were "FAKE Jews" (racial issues). A pity to see such occur...

Diversity is never something new, although it can often be something either ignored or forgotten by many.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

yedida

Ruth Messianic, joining Israel, Na'aseh v'nishma!
Oct 6, 2010
9,779
1,461
Elyria, OH
✟25,205.00
Faith
Marital Status
In Relationship
Except for some mainstream xtian churches, the fact that a Jew is a Jew is not even questioned. At least not in this neck of the woods. (And it looks like even in the mainstream, this is becoming common knowledge. Praise God for that!)
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
And even stranger story. I went to a public school. The neighborhoods served by that school system were 80 - 90% Jewish, so the student body was 80-90% Jewish. Most of the teachers were Jewish, but not all. In a social studies class, the teacher wanted to discuss prejudice and asked us about our views on black/white relations. My answer, I would not marry someone black or white, unless they were Jewish.
I know others who've had similar experiences where public schools were in predominately Jewish neighborhoods and there were less issues of discrimination/prejudice or misunderstanding. Interestingly enough, however, the answer you gave your teacher is radically different from the way many other Jews have answered when it comes to marriage. Many have grown up seeing for centuries marriages between Jews/Non-Jews that were prosperous and blessed, with one spouse supporting their mate in their Jewishness. I've seen this firsthand with some good friends of mine, as the wife is in her 50s and from the Brooklyn Jewish community while the husband is Non-Jewish. Beautiful believers in the Lord. They had to learn how to work together and understand one another, but they worked it out.

There's way too much discrimination against many married couples/familes for being mixed/multi-cultural, with many Jews noting the need for other Jewish groups/individuals to cease the prejudice against others because they find out someone's spouse is not Jewish.....something the early believers in Messiah didn't see as honorable (and similar to what occurred with Moses when his brother/sister grumbled against his wife from Cush in Numbers 12:1-3/Numbers 12 ), some noting that they were concerned about identity (more here ). For many, the larger issue isn't on whether someone is or isn't Jewish....but instead on whether or not the person is a believer.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums