I am just wondering why there has been never a return trip?
It seems really weak to just say there is nothing important up there. I mean, I am sure we could use the practice of landing a human being on another surface a few more times before we send them further off. We have spent a lot of money on some pretty useless trips (not all, but more than one) to the space station so the money issue just doesn't fly with me.
Even at a stretch, let's go up there just to erect a habitat on another surface and study the effects of both the structure and the humans living there.
I mean, it just makes me wonder...
The moon trip happened the evidence is overwhelming.
The original moonshot was motivated by the fear of being upstaged by the Commies as previously mentioned. Having won that particular battle and being strapped for cash after Vietnam and the oil crises the USA decided to step back from the space race.
The shuttle never got developed beyond the initial concept and became a bit of a white elephant in the end and probably more expensive that simply improving on the old saturn Vs.
There are a great many reasons for going to the moon and with the discovery of water ice there bases are increasingly feasible. The costs of a moon launch are much lower now than with Apollo and with the advent of a space cargo business may come down further still.
I think the 60s were quite presumptious in many ways regarding what was possible and they the forced the pace. But we are actually better equipped now than ever to go to the moon.
It will require an act of political will though and political reasons. These could include:
1) Ensuring American dominance of future space mining and energy industries which offer potentially unlimited riches.
2) Ensuring American security vis a vis other space powers which may attempt to undermine that security advantage e.g. China and Russia.
3) Providing a useful distraction from deep defence cuts which are probably required over the next decade in order to balance the budget by demonstrating American prowess on the new frontier.
4) As a basic technological stimulus that gives America the edge through óut the 21st century. This could reinforce American leadership and provide the world with a reason to love and respect America as blazing a trail for the rest of us. Is America a city on a hill (a place of vision and aspiration)- or just another Europe happy to grow fat watching TV on the couch?