Assumptions and speculation. The Bible only claims its authors were inspired by God... you have made up the rest. The only "plane crash" is your non PO former state fantasy.
No, the flood was a real deadly disaster. No other records exist but those of God. No one else but His ark of life made it out. Whether anything is spiritually inspired science is not qualified to comment, unless you claim it covers the spiritual. It does not. Therefore you are truly in the dark, and ought to admit it. I admit science is in the dark. Was that so hard?
[quoote]Then there should be a record of this migration and adptive radiation in the geological column... where is it?[/quote] It is what people have mistook for evoltion, in the Darwinian sense! Things adapt, and show up on the scene in a certain order. Remember, the evolving itself would be fast. So fast, it is debatable whether the adapting happened to the creature, NOT the off spring! Therefore all we need to do is see what ened up in the record first and later! Simple.
More interpretation and speculation.
Not really. It is well known there were differences in the early earth. Climate, for example, the arctic was semi tropical. The size of creatures for another thing!!! Look at those dinos! Then see a nearly small airplane sized flying creature, and giant birds that really couldn't get off the ground, without a lot of imagination!! Something was different! (they claim the big things just needed a good hill or some such guesswork)
Then we look at how the herb eaters ate. Nothing like it exists on earth today!!! Fancy that. The record is rife, pregnant with amazing truths and differences.
"They must have been able to break down their food somehow, but without the complex jaw joint of mammals they would not have been able to chew in the same way, and it is difficult to work out how they ate. It is also unclear what they ate: they might have been grazers, cropping vegetation close to the ground - like today's cows and sheep - or browsers, eating leaves and twigs - more like deer or giraffes. Not knowing the answers to these questions makes it difficult to understand Late Cretaceous ecosystems and how they were affected during the major extinction event 65 million years ago. "Our study uses a new approach based on analysis of the microscopic scratches that formed on hadrosaur's teeth as they fed, tens of millions of years ago. The scratches have been preserved intact since the animals died. They can tell us precisely how hadrosaur jaws moved, and the kind of food these huge herbivores ate, but nobody has tried to analyse them before."
The researchers say that the scratches reveal that the movements of hadrosaur teeth were complex and involved up and down, sideways and front to back motion. According to Paul Barrett palaeontologist at the Natural History Museum "this shows that hadrosaurs did chew, but in a
completely different way to anything alive today."
Dino Tooth Sheds New Light On Ancient Riddle: Major Group Of Dinosaurs Had Unique Way Of Eating
You "surmise" quite a lot. None of it in The Bible, though.
Wrong. All things were made3 by Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made. Therfore the dinos had to be either created or evolved from created life! No choice. That is bible.
We see giants in many places in the geological column... there is no pattern as you claim.
Of course there is. They lived and were fossilized at a certain sequence or level, or layer, or 'time' if you will. Nothing is a problem in the evidence or record. Really.
Absurd, as no man may summon the future.
But he may read what it will be like, from the word of God. That is the key. Not any imagination, or macination of man.
Not if your Interpretation of the Bible is true.
No, not if creation week is true. Jesus referred to it. If it is our physics could not be in place.
You call that gross madeness compared to your non-PO past state fantasy?? LOL!
Yes. Reducto ad absurdium. With a creator, it is not absurd.
Here we see the hubris of dad. His
interpretation of scripture is raised to the level of God's Word! You are not God. You are not his prophet. Your interpretation of scripture is no better than anyone else's.
No. A freah look at the evidence, and the bible account is in order. That doesn't make anyone honest enough to do it a prophet.
