• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Recent content by monkenstick

  1. M

    reproductive barriers

    debating with creationists is often a case of deja vu I've seen and asked this question so many times there is either no reply, or the reply is the "no new information" argument - which is a whole different case of deja vu - the argument always ends with the creationist failing to define...
  2. M

    A Simple Challenge for an Honest Debate

    I love that sketch, it borders on flattery to compare it to any of johns utterances
  3. M

    Show us your fossils

    thats the sound of goalposts shifting you see, now you have to explain why god didn't design like fallible human designers (for the sake of argument, lets ignore shared errors like pseudogenes) in constantly improving upon his designs - please remember that any criticism of this hypothesis...
  4. M

    No creator God is required.

    I'm making the statement that neither A nor B has been shown. If you know where they have, then you have a case there's nothing to disprove, its the IDist's move, not mine [/size][/color][/font] I think its the other way around
  5. M

    No creator God is required.

    I don't need to ID asserts itself as a valid scientific alternative to NDT, but hasn't actually demonstrated that it is capable of detecting design until an IDist actually demonstrates design, then they have no case - they just have an assertion, and a promissory note that one day, ID will...
  6. M

    No creator God is required.

    I don't have to, absolutely no research has come out of the intelligent design movement - not even in their own "peer reviewed" journals if you'd like to dispute this, show me where they've actually applied their high-falutin nonsense on real biology data (how about on one of the millions of...
  7. M

    Skulls... 46-48 chromosomes..

    i tried to explain to you in another thread that robertsonian translocations explain changes in chromosome number - and that they can have minimal phenotypic effect (in fact there are members of the human population who are carriers of robertsonian translocations who have no adverse phenotypic...
  8. M

    No creator God is required.

    there's nothing to debunk, no-one has ever scientifically demonstrated design [/size][/color][/font]
  9. M

    Chimp/Human DNA findings

    I found this bit interesting more support for the importance of regulatory evolution
  10. M

    Creation Science Teacher!

    won't somebody PLEASE think of the children
  11. M

    Observed Speciation

    I don't see how the chromosomes present any problem to okapi - giraffe common ancestry
  12. M

    looking for some info.

    aphex twin - fingerbib
  13. M

    Bode's Rule

    amusing us with your wacky theories? [/size][/color][/font]
  14. M

    David's Exposé of DNA

    I thought that bruce guy with his dancing greenland hypothesis of plate tectonics was a shoe in for the 2004 "nutcase award" for being completely bonkers - but dave waffen has upped the stakes considerably
  15. M

    David's Exposé of DNA

    mistake
See more
Top Bottom