Tim Walz Vows to Bring More Somalis to Minnesota, Despite Growing Fraud Scandal Reaching Into the Billions

[A2SG]

Yes he was convicted in a kangaroo court by a rogue judge and procecutor in a blue state . With multiple reasons for appeal.

So some claim. I guess there's little else to go on when one's hero is proven guilty of fraud.

Again.

I guess we'll have to see how the appeal process shakes out. I'm sure the same allegations will made about the appeals court if that doesn't go Trump's way.

It was a sham of a trial that many liberals still salivate over as a trophy conviction.

I've yet to see even a hint of evidence of any procedural errors or judicial misconduct, but I suppose for Trump's faithful, hope springs eternal.

It remains to be seen if she will be convicted, but the deranged prosecutor who ran on “getting Trump” actually according to public records committed the same type of fraud she drummed up against Trump.

Nope. Even if the DOJ manages to get another indictment through, the charges will not be the same. So far, they've failed to get a grand jury to return an indictment the last couple of attempts since their only successful attempt failed. Not looking good, I gotta say.

As for Harris she was a weak incompetent candidate who had no business even running. Do you forget she did not win the nomination she was installed by a cabal with no regard for the voters and real supporters of the Democrat party.

No argument about her weakness as a candidate, but at least she wasn't a convicted felon, so it can't be said that the Democratic party was willing to "partner up with criminals."

Don’t be so sure of yourself. In your zeal to besmirch Trump you could wind up with a reversal. If someone was falsely convicted with shoddy court proceedings it was a false and unwarranted conviction. But I do realize the “I hate Trump crowd “ will always claim victory even though it was ill gotten gain.

The only "ill gotten gains" here is the ones Trump no longer has to pay to those he defrauded.

-- A2SG, but hey, at least he got away with fraud this time, right?

 

[BCP1928]

Do you forget where this trial was held? It is actually sometimes hard to get and impartial jury. That why venues are sometimes changed. I know it is more advantageous to the liberal narrative to claim all was above board and the Trump conviction was actually blind justice but nothing could be further from the truth. We shall see how all if the appeals come out. This was liberal lawfare plain and simple.

Do you really care whether he was actually guilty or not? What difference does it make to you as long as he is pushing the right-wing Christian social agenda?

 

[A2SG]

Do you forget where this trial was held? It is actually sometimes hard to get and impartial jury. That why venues are sometimes changed. I know it is more advantageous to the liberal narrative to claim all was above board and the Trump conviction was actually blind justice but nothing could be further from the truth. We shall see how all if the appeals come out. This was liberal lawfare plain and simple.

If you assume Trump can't get a fair trial in New York, maybe he should have committed fraud in a more friendly jurisdiction.

-- A2SG, poor planning I guess.....

 

[BCP1928]

If you assume Trump can't get a fair trial in New York, maybe he should have committed fraud in a more friendly jurisdiction.

-- A2SG, poor planning I guess.....

It worked with the secret documents at mar-a-lago

 

[Vambram]

Nope. He was convicted, that's a fact. If that changes as a result of the appeal (as unlikely as that may be), then he'll simply be a former convicted felon.


Regardless of why she ran, the point was, if any party can be said to "partner up with criminals," it's more likely to be the one with the convicted felon as a candidate, not the one with a prosecutor.


No, it still happened. A lot would necessarily depend on the reasons given for the reversal, if that happens. That Trump committed the acts he was proven guilty of seems pretty conclusively demonstrated by evidence, so I highly doubt he'll be found to not have falsified business documents. Let's not forget, appeals courts don't reexamine the evidence, appeals are based on legal issues, not matters of

Well, them...and all 12 members of the jury who saw the evidence and were convinced, beyond the shadow of a doubt, of his guilt.


People can often believe any number of untrue things.

-- A2SG, not exactly a shortage of them either....

The 12 liberals in that jury believed something that was not true.

 

[Vambram]

If you assume Trump can't get a fair trial in New York, maybe he should have committed fraud in a more friendly jurisdiction.

-- A2SG, poor planning I guess.....

No matter how much you want to believe it. No matter how many times you say it, President Trump did not committ fraud. Only liberals believe that he did.

 

[comana]

No matter how much you want to believe it. No matter how many times you say it, President Trump did not committ fraud. Only liberals believe that he did.

Only liberals believe the truth then.

 

[DaisyDay]

Yes he was convicted in a kangaroo court by a rogue judge and procecutor in a blue state . With multiple reasons for appeal. It was a sham of a trial that many liberals still salivate over as a trophy conviction.

It remains to be seen if she will be convicted, but the deranged prosecutor who ran on “getting Trump” actually according to public records committed the same type of fraud she drummed up against Trump. As for Harris she was a weak incompetent candidate who had no business even running. Do you forget she did not win the nomination she was installed by a cabal with no regard for the voters and real supporters of the Democrat party.

Don’t be so sure of yourself. In your zeal to besmirch Trump you could wind up with a reversal. If someone was falsely convicted with shoddy court proceedings it was a false and unwarranted conviction. But I do realize the “I hate Trump crowd “ will always claim victory even though it was ill gotten gain.

You seem to be confusing Donald's civil fraud conviction and his criminal fraud felony conviction. The felony fraud criminal case was begun by Cyrus Vance, paused by his successor, then prosecuted successfully by Alvin Bragg. Donald J Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts - which makes him a convicted felon.

His civil fraud, prosecuted by NYS AG James is a separate case.

Odd how judges are fine for decades then go suddenly rogue when confronted by evidence of Donald's criminality.

 

[Postvieww]

You seem to be confusing Donald's civil fraud conviction and his criminal fraud felony conviction. The felony fraud criminal case was begun by Cyrus Vance, paused by his successor, then prosecuted successfully by Alvin Bragg. Donald J Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts - which makes him a convicted felon.

His civil fraud, prosecuted by NYS AG James is a separate case.

Odd how judges are fine for decades then go suddenly rogue when confronted by evidence of Donald's criminality.

Both were lawfare by liberal activists with a get Trump in any way possible attitude and motivation.

 

[Postvieww]

If you assume Trump can't get a fair trial in New York, maybe he should have committed fraud in a more friendly jurisdiction.

-- A2SG, poor planning I guess.....

If it is true he didn’t get a fair trial and I believe he didn’t. Your premise that he committed fraud is flawed.

 

[DaisyDay]

Both were lawfare by liberal activists with a get Trump in any way possible attitude and motivation.

They both resorted to facts and the law.

Trump is the lawfare expert - he's practiced it all his life and continues to this day.

 

[Vambram]

Only liberals believe the truth then.

Nope

 

[GoldenBoy89]

That's not how trials work.

Or elections.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

Do you forget where this trial was held?

Where the crimes were committed.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

No matter how much you want to believe it. No matter how many times you say it, President Trump did not committ fraud. Only liberals believe that he did.

And the courts of the State of New York.

 

[Pommer]

And the courts of the State of New York.

Well NY’s “blue” so…(I’d concede the point).

 

[wing2000]

The 12 liberals in that jury believed something that was not true.

If you don't like or appreciate our system of justice, I suggest you go elsewhere.