Judge dismisses James Comey and Letitia James cases, finding prosecutor's appointment invalid

[DaisyDay]

staff edit of a quote

Ordinarily, that phrase is one of the forbidden, but it seems apropos here. But what an unserious Congress we have! One part I don't get is why this was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Latest Action:	House - 05/15/2025 Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

 

[DaisyDay]

Yes, the largest and most-criminal city in the Western Hemisphere --with the most loan-securing businesses in USA history... had never before, in 105yrs, experienced this type of crime until Trump was charged with it.

Oh look! A deflection! Not taking the derailment bait, thanks just the same.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

Yes, I agree with that. As it is the sole point I was trying to make... that Tish likely sat up, imagined that Trump might be committing the same bank criminality she's been committing for decades, created a campaign around the goal of prosecuting him, then... charged him, just like she promised to if she won.

Just a reprehensible and corrupt woman.

This presumes that James committed a crime. Given the lack of success in even obtaining an indictment against her, that seems a very dubious presumption to make.

 

[Desk trauma]

Ordinarily, that phrase is one of the forbidden, but it seems apropos here. But what an unserious Congress we have! One part I don't get is why this was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Latest Action:	House - 05/15/2025 Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Sufficient drawer space for it to die quietly in.

 

[A2SG]

Yes, the largest and most-criminal city in the Western Hemisphere --with the most loan-securing businesses in USA history... had never before, in 105yrs, experienced this type of crime until Trump was charged with it.

Incorrect. New York Executive Law Section 63(12) has been on the books since 1956, and has been used to successfully prosecute many cases, including Exxon Mobil in 2018 and Martin Shkreli.

-- A2SG, that was very easy to debunk, you need to do better research....

 

[Factotum]

Incorrect. New York Executive Law Section 63(12) has been on the books since 1956, and has been used to successfully prosecute many cases, including Exxon Mobil in 2018 and Martin Shkreli.

-- A2SG, that was very easy to debunk, you need to do better research....

I don't think Exxon Mobil nor Shkreli showed up to sit at any defendant's table, in this similar circumstance:

"Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren’t deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren’t audited. The defense also noted that bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid... Trump’s lawyers argued that many of the case’s allegations were too old... The defense also contends that James misused a consumer-protection law to sue Trump and improperly policed private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved." Trump's massive civil fraud penalty for exaggerating financial statements is thrown out by appeals court


You can do better research next time, to avoid excluding vital info.

 

[A2SG]

I don't think Exxon Mobil nor Shkreli showed up to sit at any defendant's table, in this similar circumstance:

"Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren’t deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren’t audited. The defense also noted that bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid... Trump’s lawyers argued that many of the case’s allegations were too old... The defense also contends that James misused a consumer-protection law to sue Trump and improperly policed private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved." Trump's massive civil fraud penalty for exaggerating financial statements is thrown out by appeals court


You can do better research next time, to avoid excluding vital info.

That's completely irrelevant. You claimed New York had "never...experienced this type of crime until Trump was charged with it." I showed you the law, and two recent examples of prosecutions based on that law. Neither Trump's defense in that case nor that the judgment against Trump was tossed changes anything, Trump was still found guilty of fraud under New York Executive Law § 63(12), just as Shkreli was.

New York Executive Law § 63(12) is not some obscure law that has not been used in 105 years, as you asserted.

-- A2SG, nor has that law anything to do with the failed indictments of Letitia James....

 

[A2SG]

I believe i misstated what I meant. You @A2SG helped me figure that out --by your attempt to point out the law that Big Tish was empowered by, and not focus on the veracious actions by Trump that wrongly were called fraud by Big Tish.

What was wrong about it? Trump committed fraud, James proved that in a court of law by a preponderance of the evidence.

New York hates Trump so all of NY will agree with the lawfare result.

Um, in 2016, 2.8 million NY residents voted for Trump. In 2020, 3.25 million and in 2024, 3.5 million. Granted, more voted for his opponent in each election, but it can't be said that "all of NY" hates Trump. A lot voted for him.

Perhaps it is what Trump did that has not been treated as a crime, in 100+ years.

Sorry, but fraud has absolutely been treated as a crime for a lot longer than a hundred years.

-- A2SG, especially in NY.....

 

[Factotum]

So you're now accusing Judge Engoron of judicial misconduct?

I feel the judge is unethical, immoral, and should've recused himself. But he knew as long as it was in NY, when Trump is the defendant, then no one will have a problem with him fleecing Trump's right to due process.

Wow, your mind reading powers must be strong if you can discern the motives of millions of people all at once.

Yes. I learned the powers from studying Liberal-Democrats' continuum of discerning the motives of MAGA voters and anti-Democrat citizens.

And yes, I already explained why I feel 3.5M voted for a guy they've been duped into hating.

The appeals court ...did not reverse the verdict ... Why do you suppose that is?

Were they New York residents? Since Trump strolled down that escalator in 2015???

Are you able to read the minds of everyone on the appeals court too?

Too?
Please do not use Ad Hominem logical fallacies on me. Treat me to the same courtesy you extend to anti-Trump humans when they describe how they feel.

 

[BCP1928]

I feel the judge is unethical, immoral, and should've recused himself. But he knew as long as it was in NY, when Trump is the defendant, then no one will have a problem with him fleecing Trump's right to due process.



Yes. I learned the powers from studying Liberal-Democrats' continuum of discerning the motives of MAGA voters and anti-Democrat citizens.

And yes, I already explained why I feel 3.5M voted for a guy they've been duped into hating.



Were they New York residents? Since Trump strolled down that escalator in 2015???


Too?
Please do not use Ad Hominem logical fallacies on me. Treat me to the same courtesy you extend to anti-Trump humans when they describe how they feel.

Yes, that would be better than treating you with the same "courtesy" you extend to anti-Trump humans.

 

[FreeinChrist]

ADVISOR HAT

This thread had a clean up of some problem posts and responses.

Please remember the flaming rule. ​

 

[Factotum]

Oh look! A deflection! Not taking the derailment bait, thanks just the same.

Oh look! A hallucination!! lol

And Please, feel free to show where I was wrong in my statement you call a deflection about the Trump acts that were criminalized by L. James via lawfare.