B flat B♭

[prodromos]

And the vacuum environment next to our gaseous atmosphere where all the satellites travel 50,000km/h without friction

The atmosphere gets progressively thinner as you rise in altitude. Ask anyone who has tried to climb Mt Everest without carrying an oxygen tank. There is no sudden line where there is atmosphere on one side and vacuum on the other, it just gets thinner and thinner.

I’m the looney toon right.

Yep, that's an apt description.

 

[prodromos]

I’m pretty sure no one has taken a measuring tape and measured the circumference of the earth, in both directions. Actually, there’s no cross polar flights recorded in history even.

I'm taking it that you haven't followed the advice of @Apple Sky

Also, the Australian adventurer Dick Smith circumnavigated the earth via the poles in 1982.

 

[jonojim1337]

The atmosphere gets progressively thinner as you rise in altitude. Ask anyone who has tried to climb Mt Everest without carrying an oxygen tank. There is no sudden line where there is atmosphere on one side and vacuum on the other, it just gets thinner and thinner.

Yep, that's an apt description.

That’s oxygen, but there’s also other gasses, and at no point will it be next to a vacuum, as that is impossible.

 

[jonojim1337]

I'm taking it that you haven't followed the advice of @Apple Sky

Why don’t you prove me wrong.

 

[Strong in Him]

I've been through all this in previous posts, try reading them.

Try not being rude.

If you have explained this before, you could at least give a link or the number(s) of your post(s).

 

[prodromos]

That’s oxygen, but there’s also other gasses, and at no point will it be next to a vacuum, as that is impossible.

All the gases making up the atmosphere are thinner at higher elevations. Climbers only carry oxygen because they don't need Nitrogen and it would be extra weight.

I just told you, the atmosphere gets thinner and thinner. There are gas molecules in the moon's orbit, they are just spread out incredibly sparsely.

What is nonsense is the flat earth claim that the earth's atmosphere is sealed beneath a firmament. It we were in a sealed container then air pressure would be constant regardless of altitude. Clearly this is not the case, thus the flat earth claim is falsified.

 

[prodromos]

Why don’t you prove me wrong.

Later. It's almost midnight here.

 

[Jerry N.]

I’m pretty sure no one has taken a measuring tape and measured the circumference of the earth, in both directions. Actually, there’s no cross polar flights recorded in history even.

There are 70 satellites orbiting earth pole to pole.

 

[Apple Sky]

Try not being rude.

Sorry - I didn't mean to be rude.

What is nonsense is the flat earth claim that the earth's atmosphere is sealed beneath a firmament. It we were in a sealed container then air pressure would be constant regardless of altitude. Clearly this is not the case, thus the flat earth claim is falsified.

 

[Apple Sky]

There are 70 satellites orbiting earth pole to pole.

Prove it.

 

[jonojim1337]

All the gases making up the atmosphere are thinner at higher elevations. Climbers only carry oxygen because they don't need Nitrogen and it would be extra weight.

I just told you, the atmosphere gets thinner and thinner. There are gas molecules in the moon's orbit, they are just spread out incredibly sparsely.

What is nonsense is the flat earth claim that the earth's atmosphere is sealed beneath a firmament. It we were in a sealed container then air pressure would be constant regardless of altitude. Clearly this is not the case, thus the flat earth claim is falsified.

There’s something called buoyancy among gasses as well, which is how balloons work. Meaning lighter gasses will float up. A firmament is absolutely necessary for our atmosphere to exist, otherwise the vacuum would suck it out, as 1 G force is not enough to hold out against a vacuum and this has been demonstrably demonstrated.

The footage we have of the ISS travelling at supposed 50,000 km/h show absolutely no friction even in very light textile fabrics. This goes to show the footage is fake, because even you yourself say there shouldn’t be a vacuum there.

 

[Jerry N.]

Prove it.

I know you don’t believe in satellites. The post was for general information for those who do.

 

[jonojim1337]

I know you don’t believe in satellites. The post was for general information for those who do.

Sigh

8K views · 239 reactions | Proofs NASA Lied | Erwin Muhammad

Proofs NASA Lied

www.facebook.com

 

[Hentenza]

When was this measure taken

It’s the current measurement.

 

[Jerry N.]

There’s something called buoyancy among gasses as well, which is how balloons work. Meaning lighter gasses will float up. A firmament is absolutely necessary for our atmosphere to exist, otherwise the vacuum would suck it out, as 1 G force is not enough to hold out against a vacuum and this has been demonstrably demonstrated.

The footage we have of the ISS travelling at supposed 50,000 km/h show absolutely no friction even in very light textile fabrics. This goes to show the footage is fake, because even you yourself say there shouldn’t be a vacuum there.

Here is the formula for atmospheric density from AI:

Gravitational Force and Atmospheric Density

Increasing Density with Depth:

As you go deeper into the atmosphere (closer to the Earth's surface), the density of air increases. This is because gravity pulls more air molecules closer to the planet, resulting in higher pressure and density.

The hydrostatic equation describes how pressure increases with depth due to gravity: P=P0+ρgh

P: Pressure at depth

P0: Initial pressure at the surface

ρ: Density of the air

g: Acceleration due to gravity

h: Depth

How is “1 G force not enough to hold out against a vacuum and this has been demonstrably demonstrated”?

 

[Hentenza]

Why don’t you prove me wrong.

The overwhelming data proves you wrong. There. We’ve been to space. We’ve been to the moon. We’ve flown AROUND the world. Your head is in the sand.

 

[Apple Sky]

That’s oxygen, but there’s also other gasses, and at no point will it be next to a vacuum, as that is impossible.

Yes I did have a short video explaining this but I can't seem to find it at the mo.

 

[Hentenza]

Sigh

8K views · 239 reactions | Proofs NASA Lied | Erwin Muhammad

Proofs NASA Lied

www.facebook.com

Facebook must be right.

 

[Strong in Him]

Sorry - I didn't mean to be rude.

It's ok; I was probably a bit touchy.

 

[jonojim1337]

Here is the formula for atmospheric density from AI:

Gravitational Force and Atmospheric Density

Increasing Density with Depth:

As you go deeper into the atmosphere (closer to the Earth's surface), the density of air increases. This is because gravity pulls more air molecules closer to the planet, resulting in higher pressure and density.

The hydrostatic equation describes how pressure increases with depth due to gravity: P=P0+ρgh

P: Pressure at depth

P0: Initial pressure at the surface

ρ: Density of the air

g: Acceleration due to gravity

h: Depth

Ok so explain how a hot air or gas balloon works.

How is “1 G force not enough to hold out against a vacuum and this has been demonstrably demonstrated”?

Easy. Create a vacuum, then hold it against the surface of the earth, and see if the air is sucked into the vacuum or stays due to gravity