The NEA is pushing far left teaching upon children

[Oompa Loompa]

I've already given my answer.

-- A2SG, asked and answered....

"Yeah. Probably." That was your answer. When the obvious answer was, "Yes! That is absolutely a human being. Or at least, definitely not a cat." But you couldn't say that, could you?

Back to my point. To tell me that a man can become a woman though any type of surgery or "gender affirming" care, and to enable their delusion by going along with it out of fear of making them uncomfortable with their delusion, is to do more harm to them, and all those currently being groomed and deceived by those claiming to be their "allies."

 

[A2SG]

"Yeah. Probably." That was your answer. When the obvious answer was, "Yes! That is absolutely a human being. Or at least, definitely not a cat." But you couldn't say that, could you?

What's this?

Back to my point. To tell me that a man can become a woman though any type of surgery or "gender affirming" care, and to enable their delusion by going along with it out of fear of making them uncomfortable with their delusion, is to do more harm to them, and all those currently being groomed and deceived by those claiming to be their "allies."

Thanks for your opinion. Next time a trans person requires your approval before living their life however they wish to, I'll refer them to you.

-- A2SG, in the meantime, I'll try not to tell you any such thing....

 

[Oompa Loompa]

What's this?

View attachment 373940


Thanks for your opinion. Next time a trans person requires your approval before living their life however they wish to, I'll refer them to you.

-- A2SG, in the meantime, I'll try not to tell you any such thing....

So you are saying that you could not answer the question because you could not determine if it was a cat, or a representation of a cat? You are not helping your argument at all. In fact, you are making it much worse. The fact that we are even having this discussion proves there is an ideological barrier preventing discernment of reality.

 

[rjs330]

We were just exploring various forms of non standard gender expression.

Why? It has nothing to do with being transgendered or whether or not a person is a boy or a girl.

 

[A2SG]

So you are saying that you could not answer the question because you could not determine if it was a cat, or a representation of a cat?

No, I said I answered the question. Exactly as I intended.

You are not helping your argument at all.

What argument do you think I'm making, exactly?

In fact, you are making it much worse. The fact that we are even having this discussion proves there is an ideological barrier preventing discernment of reality.

Actually, the fact that we are even having this discussion proves both of us have too much time on our hands.

-- A2SG, the internet really makes distracting yourself a heck of a lot easier...

 

[rjs330]

What's different between you and me is that I don't consider a female body "weird looking".

A man cannot have a female body. A man can have surgeries in order to try and look like a female, but they do not have a female body.

 

[Larniavc]

No, because the pronoun police demand that certain pronouns be used by others. No one here has made that demand. Are you?

One would have thought no demand was required if people just went with what was preferred by the person.

Is using the non-preferred pronoun really so hard for you to do?