• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Matthew Dowd Fired from MSNBC For Vile Comments Blaming Charlie Kirk For Assassination

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,874
15,327
Seattle
✟1,204,868.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
This case is about those which defend his murder. Including the judge.
1762119761306.gif
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,596
20,436
Finger Lakes
✟327,122.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Being insensitive? For being approving of MURDER...
That is disingenuous as well as inaccurate. How does the following condone murder or specifically Kirk's murder:

“He’s been one of the most divisive, especially divisive younger figures in this, who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups. And I always go back to, hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions. And I think that is the environment we are in. You can’t stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place. And that’s the unfortunate environment we are in.”​
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,467
2,658
✟282,417.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
That is disingenuous as well as inaccurate. How does the following condone murder or specifically Kirk's murder:

“He’s been one of the most divisive, especially divisive younger figures in this, who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups. And I always go back to, hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions. And I think that is the environment we are in. You can’t stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place. And that’s the unfortunate environment we are in.”​
Speech does not cause murder. Approving of such an idea can cause someone to be fired. Which is not a crime.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,928
46,937
Los Angeles Area
✟1,048,437.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Speech does not cause murder. Approving of such an idea can cause someone to be fired. Which is not a crime.
Unless the employer is the government, in which case firing people for free speech is unconstitutional.
 
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,467
2,658
✟282,417.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Unless the employer is the government, in which case firing people for free speech is unconstitutional.
The employer is we the tax payers. We pay their salary. For the public employee, to believe it is ok to commit a crime ( especially heinous crimes like murder) because he does not like what you say or think should not be working for the public. That is an open and blatant threat. I would not want to be a co-worker, a neighbor, or be in proximity or contact with such an individual, let alone (employ) pay him.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,596
20,436
Finger Lakes
✟327,122.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,467
2,658
✟282,417.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
It can incite murder.
It can incite a MURDERER.
Stating is not approving.
It is approving of murdering
That depends....

So how did Dowd condone murder? He did not. So why should he be fired for his speech?
He said Kirks speech was the cause of his murder. The same goes for employees of "WE", the public. We pay their wages. Why on earth would anyone want to associate with someone who believes it is ok to kill someone they don't like? It is insane!
 
Upvote 0

ralliann

christian
Jun 27, 2007
8,467
2,658
✟282,417.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
That's right. We The People set up some rules about how We do things. The First Amendment is part of that.
The first amendment indeed applies to all people. This is not about free speech. It is about employees who believe it is ok to kill people for their speech. People in employment anywhere that are ok with committing a crime against others for their speech. There are no rules we give people in public employment the ok to kill others for their speech. Nor take away our freedom of Speech to fire such people. They intimidate others they are around from free speech.
 
Upvote 0