And what Jesus said was that many would be deceived. Matthew 24:5
Because many would come in his name claiming to be the Christ, not because they believed that certain countries would do certain things or that wars would/wouldn't happen.
But 2 Peter 1:19 says we should attend to the Words of the Prophets.
Peter is telling the people he is writing to that they can trust what he tells them about Jesus because he was there - a witness at the transfiguration.
You might ask yourself why he picks out that event in particular. Why doesn't he say "we saw the empty tomb"? "We were there when he called us to leave our nets"? "We saw him raise Jairus' daughter from the dead", for example?
He also tells them that they should listen to the prophetic message - the prophets prophesied about Jesus.
He does NOT say, "this means reading only those prophets who talk about end times, selecting random verses and coming up with your own theory."
That the majority have turned to false teachings, is readily apparent; with the proliferation of theories, ideas and plain guesswork abounding today.
People turn to false teachers and get sucked in by groups like JWs, because they generally don't know the Bible. They cannot contradict someone who says "the Bible teaches ...." , shows them the relevant verse and then goes on to push their own doctrine rather than Biblical teaching.
They may get sucked in by these groups also because they are vulnerable/searching for something and the cults, at least in the early days, use love-bombing - telling the new convert how loved, special, wise etc they are.
It really is unreasonable for you to say we cannot gain understanding of the ancient Prophesies from modern knowledge.
I didn't say that. We can use what we have now - commentaries, bible resources, the ability to learn Bible languages/use interlinear Bibles - to study and learn what they said and what they meant.
I said that it is wrong to take the words of a prophet, or, more likely a random verse, and teach that it applies to us today - to a modern day situation. If they were writing to Jews of a certain time, their words were for Jews of a certain time. IF there is a future application in a prophecy then Jesus, or the Apostles, tell us. Like in Matthew 2:17; Matthew tells us that an OT prophecy is being fulfilled.
Neither Jesus nor the Apostles taught that we should all read the prophets, take selected verses and all come up with our own ideas.
You have said that hardly any other Christians agree with what you teach - yet if your teachings were the teachings of the OT prophets, everyone would. You're not the only person who has ever read the OT.
In Zechariah 5:6-7, the flying object is described as an 'ephah' or as a 'barrel'. One that requires a lead cover to keep the 'wickedness', covered.
The book of Zechariah describes several visions and uses allegorical language.
The prophet looks and "sees" a man with a measuring line, Zec 2:1, Joshua standing before the Lord and Satan, Zec 3:1, seven lampstands and two olive trees, Zec 4:2, a flying scroll with writing on both sides, a basket, and so on. Why have you ignored all these other things and focused just on the "flying scroll"?
Incidentally, the writing on both sides of the scroll is about banishing thieves and false witnesses from the land.
The lead cover you mention is not on the flying scroll but over the basket, Zechariah 5:7.
Until you can come up with a better explanation than a nuke missile for it, then it would be best to not show your bias and ignorance.
I don't have any "bias and ignorance" - unless it's against those who take random Scriptures out of context, apply them to modern situations and then teaches that everyone who disagrees with them is wrong.