It does if you are not your parents dependent. You don’t have claim your parents income after you reach 21 years old. I worked in academia for while so I’m aware of the requirements.
I’m aware of the policy and worked for the agency that created it and was an independent student as well. This is a minor point in my response and not a topic for debate. If you’re interested in recent statistics you can look at the stats from
Lumina Foundation.
But technically I was a “middle class student” for your graph. My dad is an airplane engineer. That’s about as middle class as it gets. These grant opportunities are available for anyone with patience.
I’m not addressing what exists at
present. I’m speaking of the policies underway or in the pipeline. I‘ll repeat once more for those who thought otherwise. The policy of
this administration on the subject of college financial aid and related programs that assist the poor like Head Start, GearUp, etc. are reductions or eliminations.
I’m working through the Project 2025 Mandate and the 229 policy suggestions depicted on The Heritage Foundation website and there’s a
consistent practice of cuts and elimination of programs benefiting low and middle income citizens.
In respect to SNAP, stricter work requirements were implemented in July of 2025. The same applies for Medicaid in addition to time limits and/or financial caps. There will be a limited period that you can receive benefits for your lifetime and related caps on spending. There’s no mention of what occurs when they’re exhausted.
The policy recommendations impacting senior citizens, the disabled and veterans weren’t included in the mandate nor the ones that are more controversial. But they’re being pushed through.
I'm getting tired of being humiliated and insulted for all of the loopholes I've exploited and strange opportunities that I've found by not acting like the U.S. workplace economic system says I'm supposed to. It's like it's immoral to take a Pell Grant instead of a loan. Or to take SNAP instead of starving.
The premise behind alternatives is personal betterment. If a different course has permitted you to do so that’s fine. But if that perspective requires cooperation or support from others to undertake that’s a different matter. For example, I have the liberty of saying I’ll never have a mortgage and I haven’t. But saying the same while living at home and relying on parental support is something else. I can’t morally force their hands and expect them to go along. They have to agree to do so.
When I told my daughter that we should have a property with the potential for multiple homes as opposed to the norm she had to consent. Which required me to articulate my vision and how it benefited both and what we needed to do to accomplish it. Buy-in is an outgrowth of belief. They must believe you can do what you say and that’s usually based on results. Pushback is their way of communicating they’re not on board.
I spoke about this in the past concerning my relatives during the pandemic. They wanted to conduct their affairs as usual but I put my foot down. I made them use my suppliers, take the natural supplements I recommended, build a long-term pantry and purchase crypto. I provided two scenarios and asked which one they wanted to gamble on. Did I strong arm them? Absolutely. Do they regret it? Not at all. Because they respect my wisdom.
Ideas are nice but we’re our greatest testimony. When we have a consistent pattern of putting thoughts into action that work and move us forward people notice. They may not understand the how or why but the outcome speaks for itself. When people bet against you don’t take it personal prove them wrong.
~bella