B flat B♭

[Apple Sky]

No. There are airlines now that can travel across Antartica.

Polar route - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

From your article Wikipedia;

Few airlines fly between cities having a great circle route over Antarctica. Hypothetically, flights between South Africa and New Zealand, or between either Western Australia or Western Southeast Asia and southern South America, would overfly Antarctica, but no airline currently operates such flights.

The southernmost flight route with plausible airports would be between Buenos Aires and Perth.[40] With a 175° (S) heading, the route's great circle exceeds 85° S and would be within 500 kilometres (310 mi) of the South Pole. Currently, no commercial airline operates this 12,600-kilometre (7,800 mi; 6,800 nmi) route. However, in February 2018, it was stated that Norwegian Air Argentina is considering this "less than 15 hours" trans-polar flight between South America and Southeast Asia, with a stop-over in Perth en route to Singapore.[41] They will not fly over the South Pole, but around Antarctica taking advantage of the strong winds which circle that continent in an easterly direction. Hence, the "westbound" flight from Buenos Aires would actually travel south-east south of Cape Town, over the southern Indian Ocean and on to Perth, while the true "eastbound" flight would also head south-east south of Tasmania and New Zealand, over the South Pacific and on to South America. If this route becomes operational, a Buenos Aires – Singapore return flight would possibly be the fastest circumnavigation available with commercial airliners, although Perth – Buenos Aires return would be faster but without passing the Equator

 

[prodromos]

Here we have Rob skiba talking about Antarctica.

Why would anyone consider him to be an authority?

 

[prodromos]

From your article Wikipedia;

Few airlines fly between cities having a great circle route over Antarctica. Hypothetically, flights between South Africa and New Zealand, or between either Western Australia or Western Southeast Asia and southern South America, would overfly Antarctica, but no airline currently operates such flights.

The southernmost flight route with plausible airports would be between Buenos Aires and Perth.[40] With a 175° (S) heading, the route's great circle exceeds 85° S and would be within 500 kilometres (310 mi) of the South Pole. Currently, no commercial airline operates this 12,600-kilometre (7,800 mi; 6,800 nmi) route. However, in February 2018, it was stated that Norwegian Air Argentina is considering this "less than 15 hours" trans-polar flight between South America and Southeast Asia, with a stop-over in Perth en route to Singapore.[41] They will not fly over the South Pole, but around Antarctica taking advantage of the strong winds which circle that continent in an easterly direction. Hence, the "westbound" flight from Buenos Aires would actually travel south-east south of Cape Town, over the southern Indian Ocean and on to Perth, while the true "eastbound" flight would also head south-east south of Tasmania and New Zealand, over the South Pacific and on to South America. If this route becomes operational, a Buenos Aires – Singapore return flight would possibly be the fastest circumnavigation available with commercial airliners, although Perth – Buenos Aires return would be faster but without passing the Equator

You post this yet fail to understand that all these direct flights between cities in the Southern Hemisphere, regardless of whether they fly over Antarctica, are not possible on your flat pizza earth, and yet they fly on a regular basis. You keep posting proof of the globe.

 

[Apple Sky]

regardless of whether they fly over Antarctica, are not possible on your flat pizza earth, and yet they fly on a regular basis.

Show me flights that fly over Antarctica .

 

[Herman Hedning]

People have visited a small section of Antarctica, mostly the outer islands. People/Tourists are not allowed to go any further in, or get any further in b/c of the ice walls.

No, there are research stations further inland too, including the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station that is located literally right on top of the South Pole. There are many YouTube videos showing the facilities, like these: Search on YouTube.

Here's the physical south pole. It must be polished regularly all year around.

 

[Apple Sky]

No, there are research stations further inland too, including the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station that is located literally right on top of the South Pole.

On top of the South pole where exactly is this location ?

The only thing I got from your Wikipedia article was this;

Dome (1975–2010)​

For Operation Deep Freeze 73, U.S. Navy Seabees built the six-storey high Geodesic Dome. Shown here in 1973 when the snow level was lower; the base of the dome was at ground level.
The station was moved in 1975 to the newly constructed Buckminster Fuller geodesic dome 160 feet (50 m) wide by 52 feet (16 m) high, with 46 by 79 feet (14 m × 24 m) steel archways.

Nice to see they are copying God

 

[Herman Hedning]

Tourism to Antarctica is strictly controlled but quite a few do go there. Here's the current statistics taken from the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators web site.

The Deep Field number are visitors that actually go to the South Pole. Anyone interested can find lots of statistics here.

 

[Herman Hedning]

On top of the South pole where exactly is this location ?

I was a little hyperbolic, the south pole is maybe 100 meters away from the station. Here it is in relation to the dome:

 

[Apple Sky]

I was a little hyperbolic, the south pole is maybe 100 meters away from the station. Here it is in relation to the dome:
View attachment 372192

What strikes me about this image is some sort of chimney in the background polluting the atmosphere.

 

[Hentenza]

From your article Wikipedia;

Few airlines fly between cities having a great circle route over Antarctica. Hypothetically, flights between South Africa and New Zealand, or between either Western Australia or Western Southeast Asia and southern South America, would overfly Antarctica, but no airline currently operates such flights.

The southernmost flight route with plausible airports would be between Buenos Aires and Perth.[40] With a 175° (S) heading, the route's great circle exceeds 85° S and would be within 500 kilometres (310 mi) of the South Pole. Currently, no commercial airline operates this 12,600-kilometre (7,800 mi; 6,800 nmi) route. However, in February 2018, it was stated that Norwegian Air Argentina is considering this "less than 15 hours" trans-polar flight between South America and Southeast Asia, with a stop-over in Perth en route to Singapore.[41] They will not fly over the South Pole, but around Antarctica taking advantage of the strong winds which circle that continent in an easterly direction. Hence, the "westbound" flight from Buenos Aires would actually travel south-east south of Cape Town, over the southern Indian Ocean and on to Perth, while the true "eastbound" flight would also head south-east south of Tasmania and New Zealand, over the South Pacific and on to South America. If this route becomes operational, a Buenos Aires – Singapore return flight would possibly be the fastest circumnavigation available with commercial airliners, although Perth – Buenos Aires return would be faster but without passing the Equator

I guess you decided to ignore the part of the article that refutes your theory. There are routes between Sydney and South America that fly over Antarctica.

Qantas QFA27 and QFA28 and LATAM LA809 and LA810 fly nonstop between Sydney and Santiago de Chile, the most southerly polar route. Depending on winds, this flight may reach 70° south latitude. From July 2012[31] until 2014, Aerolíneas Argentinas flew nonstop between Sydney and Buenos Aires.[32][better source needed] Previously, Qantas also operated QFA17 and QFA18 between Sydney and Buenos Aires. Nowadays, LATAM operates LAN804 and LAN805 between Melbourne, Australia, and Santiago, Chile, and Air New Zealand, until 2020, operated ANZ30 and ANZ31 between Auckland and Buenos Aires all with similarly south-running routes.


Here is where Antartica is on Earth (yes it’s round) and you see Australia and South America and how the route would take it past Antartica.

 

[Hentenza]

What strikes me about this image is some sort of chimney in the background polluting the atmosphere.

That’s a cloud. Expand the image so you can see it clearly.

 

[Apple Sky]

I guess you decided to ignore the part of the article that refutes your theory. There are routes between Sydney and South America that fly over Antarctica.

Qantas QFA27 and QFA28 and LATAM LA809 and LA810 fly nonstop between Sydney and Santiago de Chile, the most southerly polar route. Depending on winds, this flight may reach 70° south latitude. From July 2012[31] until 2014, Aerolíneas Argentinas flew nonstop between Sydney and Buenos Aires.[32][better source needed] Previously, Qantas also operated QFA17 and QFA18 between Sydney and Buenos Aires. Nowadays, LATAM operates LAN804 and LAN805 between Melbourne, Australia, and Santiago, Chile, and Air New Zealand, until 2020, operated ANZ30 and ANZ31 between Auckland and Buenos Aires all with similarly south-running routes.


Here is where Antartica is on Earth (yes it’s round) and you see Australia and South America and how the route would take it past Antartica.

View attachment 372193

I need to see them for real & their flights paths over Antarctica, I don't know the soft ware you use to get all the flight paths, maybe you could help.

 

[Apple Sky]

That’s a cloud. Expand the image so you can see it clearly.

The sky is cloudless so no it's not, it's smoke.

 

[Herman Hedning]

I need to see them for real & their flights paths over Antarctica, I don't know the soft ware you use to get all the flight paths, maybe you could help.

Here you go: the southernmost commercial flight. Qantas performs longest-ever commercial flight | Flightradar24 Blog

 

[Apple Sky]

Here you go: the southernmost commercial flight. Qantas performs longest-ever commercial flight | Flightradar24 Blog

And not one of them fly's over Antarctica.

 

[Herman Hedning]

What strikes me about this image is some sort of chimney in the background polluting the atmosphere.

Well yes, it is pretty cold down there... They use diesel generators that produce electricity as well as heating.

 

[Hentenza]

The sky is cloudless so no it's not, it's smoke.

Again, open the picture and you can see that there is no smokestack. It’s a low cloud.

 

[Herman Hedning]

And not one of them fly's over Antarctica.

That is true. Since the continents are where they are there's no reason to fly commercially over the inland of Antarctica. But there are specialty flights that takes you to the pole: Fly to the South Pole and visit the geographical South Pole. – PolarQuest Time to book a trip this winter? Cheap at only 65,000 USD.

 

[prodromos]

Show me flights that fly over Antarctica .

I didn't say they did, but the flight paths they follow approach Antarctica which would exceed their range on your flat pizza earth, yet the distance they actually fly perfectly corresponds to the globe.
The direct flights between cities in the Southern Hemisphere are not possible on your imaginary flat earth, so how do you explain multiple such flights every week?

 

[prodromos]

I need to see them for real & their flights paths over Antarctica, I don't know the soft ware you use to get all the flight paths, maybe you could help.

These are the great circle routes between these cities, the shortest route possible for each.

As you can see, if they were to fly over Antarctica it would no longer be the shortest route, requiring move fuel and longer flight times than necessary. Airlines are in the business of making profit, which means taking the most efficient route within reason. Sometimes they have to divert around war zones so they don't get shot down.
A direct flight between Auckland and Johannesburg would come closest to passing over the Antarctic continent, but again would be taking a longer route if it were to do so.