• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

What does the Temple in Ezekiel 40-41 represent?

Mercy Shown

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2019
852
240
65
Boonsboro
✟96,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In my reading of the bible I have come to Ezekiel 40 and 41. Here I read about a detailed description of a temple that does not exisit and never has. I began thinking about this and wondering if this is a failed prophecy or something else. These are my thoughts on it so far. Which one do you subscribe to?

The Context

Ezekiel 40–48 presents a remarkable vision of a temple given to the prophet in 573 BC, after Jerusalem and the first temple had been destroyed by Babylon. Ezekiel and the people were in exile, cut off from their land, their king, and the visible presence of God that had dwelled in the temple. Into that despair, God gave this vision to restore hope. The detailed description of architecture and measurements in chapters 40–42, the renewed worship and priesthood in 43–46, and the life-giving river and redivided land in 47–48 together form a picture of restoration and divine presence returning to a renewed people.

Main Views of the Temple’s Significance

Literal / Millennial Temple (Futurist View)

Some interpreters, especially within dispensational theology, see Ezekiel’s temple as a literal structure that will be built in a future millennial kingdom when Christ reigns on earth. They point to the extraordinary precision of the measurements as evidence that this is a real architectural plan. The sacrifices described are viewed not as atoning, since Christ’s sacrifice was once for all, but as memorial or symbolic acts of worship that look back to the cross. This view draws heavily on passages such as Ezekiel 43:7, where God calls the temple “the place of My throne,” and on the reinstated offerings in Ezekiel 43:18–27, interpreting them as part of a renewed worship system under Christ’s earthly rule.

Symbolic / Spiritual Temple (Typological View)

Others interpret the temple as a symbolic representation of God’s restored presence among His people, ultimately fulfilled in Christ and His Church. In this view, the detailed measurements and perfect symmetry signify holiness and divine order rather than literal construction. The New Testament supports this interpretation when Jesus identifies His own body as the true temple (John 2:19–21), and when Paul says that believers are “built together for a dwelling place of God in the Spirit” (Ephesians 2:19–22). The vision finds its ultimate fulfillment in Revelation 21–22, where the New Jerusalem has no temple because “the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple.” Thus, Ezekiel’s temple points forward to the reality of God dwelling fully and eternally with His redeemed people.

Idealized Vision for Israel’s Restoration (Historical View)

A third interpretation sees Ezekiel’s temple as an idealized theological blueprint rather than a literal plan for construction. According to this view, the vision was meant to inspire holiness, hope, and repentance among the exiles by presenting a perfect image of worship and order under God’s rule. The post-exilic temple built under Zerubbabel and later expanded by Herod did not match Ezekiel’s plan, suggesting it was never intended as a physical design. Instead, it was a call for spiritual renewal, demonstrating that God’s presence would once again dwell among a sanctified people who obey His laws (Ezekiel 43:10–11).

Theological Themes

The first great theme of the temple vision is the restoration of God’s presence. In Ezekiel 10, God’s glory departed from the temple because of Israel’s sin, but in Ezekiel 43 His glory returns from the east, symbolizing reconciliation and renewed fellowship. Second, the precise measurements and divisions throughout the vision underscore holiness and order, teaching that God is transcendent and pure, and that access to Him must be rightly ordered. Third, the temple represents the renewal of true worship. The reestablished priesthood and offerings point to the principle that worship must conform to God’s holiness — a principle later fulfilled in worship “in spirit and truth” (John 4:23–24). Finally, the river flowing from the temple in chapter 47 symbolizes new creation and life, echoing the Garden of Eden and anticipating the river of life in Revelation 22. The temple thus becomes a picture of creation restored and sanctified by God’s presence.

Summary

In summary, the temple of Ezekiel 40–41 can be understood through three main lenses. The literal or futurist view sees it as a physical temple yet to be built in the messianic age. The symbolic or spiritual view understands it as a figure of Christ and His body, the Church, through whom God now dwells with His people. The ideal or historical view treats it as a visionary blueprint expressing God’s holiness and desire to restore His people after exile. Each view, in its own way, points toward the same ultimate truth — that God intends to dwell once again among a holy and renewed people.

My Take (Synthesis)

Taken together, Ezekiel’s temple is best understood as a vision of God’s presence restored to a sanctified people in a perfectly ordered creation. It carries both a spiritual fulfillment in Christ and His Church today, and a future consummation when God’s glory fills the new heavens and new earth. The temple’s meaning is not limited to architecture; it reveals the heart of God’s redemptive plan. In essence, Ezekiel’s temple signifies the full return of God’s presence to dwell among His people forever — the ultimate restoration of holiness, worship, and life.
 

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,477
11,972
Georgia
✟1,107,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
1. Moses told Israel that they had two paths before them , a success path the ends in greatness and and fail path that they could choose.
2. At the dedication of Solomon's temple, king Solomon told Israel that they had two paths before them , a success path the ends in greatness and and fail path that they could choose which would leave them the the temple desolated
3. Jesus said in Matt 23 "behold your house is left unto you desolate", which is the curse of Solomon
4. Jesus then said "you will NOT see me again until you say blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord"
5. Rev 1:7 says that some of the Jews that pierced him 2000 years ago would be raised to see His appearing in Rev 19 at the start of the 1000 year millennium.
6. the Gog and Magog of Ezekiel show up in Rev 20 --- after the 1000 year literal millennium and try to attack the New Jerusalem, the holy city, city of the saints and are destroyed
7. In Heb 8:1-2 we see "The Third Temple" fully functional, in Heaven, with Christ as functioning High Priest. This is already the case in 65 AD (the date the book of Hebrews was written" and it is true even while the second temple in Jerusalem was still functional with priests and animal sacrifices ( as we are reminded in the book of Hebrews). In addition - the Veil of the Jewish temple was torn from top to bottom at the crucifixion of Christ signalling the end of that temple service.

Heb 8: 1 Now the main point in what has been said is this: we have such a high priest, who has taken His seat at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens, 2 a minister in the sanctuary and in the true tabernacle (temple), which the Lord pitched, not man
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
11,461
9,482
65
Martinez
✟1,178,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In my reading of the bible I have come to Ezekiel 40 and 41. Here I read about a detailed description of a temple that does not exisit and never has. I began thinking about this and wondering if this is a failed prophecy or something else. These are my thoughts on it so far. Which one do you subscribe to?

The Context

Ezekiel 40–48 presents a remarkable vision of a temple given to the prophet in 573 BC, after Jerusalem and the first temple had been destroyed by Babylon. Ezekiel and the people were in exile, cut off from their land, their king, and the visible presence of God that had dwelled in the temple. Into that despair, God gave this vision to restore hope. The detailed description of architecture and measurements in chapters 40–42, the renewed worship and priesthood in 43–46, and the life-giving river and redivided land in 47–48 together form a picture of restoration and divine presence returning to a renewed people.

Main Views of the Temple’s Significance

Literal / Millennial Temple (Futurist View)

Some interpreters, especially within dispensational theology, see Ezekiel’s temple as a literal structure that will be built in a future millennial kingdom when Christ reigns on earth. They point to the extraordinary precision of the measurements as evidence that this is a real architectural plan. The sacrifices described are viewed not as atoning, since Christ’s sacrifice was once for all, but as memorial or symbolic acts of worship that look back to the cross. This view draws heavily on passages such as Ezekiel 43:7, where God calls the temple “the place of My throne,” and on the reinstated offerings in Ezekiel 43:18–27, interpreting them as part of a renewed worship system under Christ’s earthly rule.

Symbolic / Spiritual Temple (Typological View)

Others interpret the temple as a symbolic representation of God’s restored presence among His people, ultimately fulfilled in Christ and His Church. In this view, the detailed measurements and perfect symmetry signify holiness and divine order rather than literal construction. The New Testament supports this interpretation when Jesus identifies His own body as the true temple (John 2:19–21), and when Paul says that believers are “built together for a dwelling place of God in the Spirit” (Ephesians 2:19–22). The vision finds its ultimate fulfillment in Revelation 21–22, where the New Jerusalem has no temple because “the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple.” Thus, Ezekiel’s temple points forward to the reality of God dwelling fully and eternally with His redeemed people.

Idealized Vision for Israel’s Restoration (Historical View)

A third interpretation sees Ezekiel’s temple as an idealized theological blueprint rather than a literal plan for construction. According to this view, the vision was meant to inspire holiness, hope, and repentance among the exiles by presenting a perfect image of worship and order under God’s rule. The post-exilic temple built under Zerubbabel and later expanded by Herod did not match Ezekiel’s plan, suggesting it was never intended as a physical design. Instead, it was a call for spiritual renewal, demonstrating that God’s presence would once again dwell among a sanctified people who obey His laws (Ezekiel 43:10–11).

Theological Themes

The first great theme of the temple vision is the restoration of God’s presence. In Ezekiel 10, God’s glory departed from the temple because of Israel’s sin, but in Ezekiel 43 His glory returns from the east, symbolizing reconciliation and renewed fellowship. Second, the precise measurements and divisions throughout the vision underscore holiness and order, teaching that God is transcendent and pure, and that access to Him must be rightly ordered. Third, the temple represents the renewal of true worship. The reestablished priesthood and offerings point to the principle that worship must conform to God’s holiness — a principle later fulfilled in worship “in spirit and truth” (John 4:23–24). Finally, the river flowing from the temple in chapter 47 symbolizes new creation and life, echoing the Garden of Eden and anticipating the river of life in Revelation 22. The temple thus becomes a picture of creation restored and sanctified by God’s presence.

Summary

In summary, the temple of Ezekiel 40–41 can be understood through three main lenses. The literal or futurist view sees it as a physical temple yet to be built in the messianic age. The symbolic or spiritual view understands it as a figure of Christ and His body, the Church, through whom God now dwells with His people. The ideal or historical view treats it as a visionary blueprint expressing God’s holiness and desire to restore His people after exile. Each view, in its own way, points toward the same ultimate truth — that God intends to dwell once again among a holy and renewed people.

My Take (Synthesis)

Taken together, Ezekiel’s temple is best understood as a vision of God’s presence restored to a sanctified people in a perfectly ordered creation. It carries both a spiritual fulfillment in Christ and His Church today, and a future consummation when God’s glory fills the new heavens and new earth. The temple’s meaning is not limited to architecture; it reveals the heart of God’s redemptive plan. In essence, Ezekiel’s temple signifies the full return of God’s presence to dwell among His people forever — the ultimate restoration of holiness, worship, and life.
Doesn't Ezekiel 43 10-11 explain the meaning of this vision? It strongly links the physical temple vision to the spiritual condition of the people's hearts and their obedience to God's law.
Not a physical temple.

Ezekiel 43:10-11
"Son of man, describe the temple to the house of Israel, that they may be ashamed of their iniquities. Let them measure the pattern, and if they are ashamed of all they have done, show them the form of the house, and its fashion, and its exits and its entrances, and all its forms, and all its ordinances, and all its forms, and all its laws, and write it in their sight, that they may keep the whole design and all its ordinances, and perform them."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mercy Shown
Upvote 0

Mercy Shown

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2019
852
240
65
Boonsboro
✟96,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Doesn't Ezekiel 43 10-11 explain the meaning of this vision? It strongly links the physical temple vision to the spiritual condition of the people's hearts and their obedience to God's law.
Not a physical temple.

Ezekiel 43:10-11
"Son of man, describe the temple to the house of Israel, that they may be ashamed of their iniquities. Let them measure the pattern, and if they are ashamed of all they have done, show them the form of the house, and its fashion, and its exits and its entrances, and all its forms, and all its ordinances, and all its forms, and all its laws, and write it in their sight, that they may keep the whole design and all its ordinances, and perform them."
I agree. Having a temple in the future would seem to deny Christ's sacrifice.
 
Upvote 0

Mercy Shown

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2019
852
240
65
Boonsboro
✟96,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
1. Moses told Israel that they had two paths before them , a success path the ends in greatness and and fail path that they could choose.
2. At the dedication of Solomon's temple, king Solomon told Israel that they had two paths before them , a success path the ends in greatness and and fail path that they could choose which would leave them the the temple desolated
3. Jesus said in Matt 23 "behold your house is left unto you desolate", which is the curse of Solomon
4. Jesus then said "you will NOT see me again until you say blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord"
5. Rev 1:7 says that some of the Jews that pierced him 2000 years ago would be raised to see His appearing in Rev 19 at the start of the 1000 year millennium.
6. the Gog and Magog of Ezekiel show up in Rev 20 --- after the 1000 year literal millennium and try to attack the New Jerusalem, the holy city, city of the saints and are destroyed
7. In Heb 8:1-2 we see "The Third Temple" fully functional, in Heaven, with Christ as functioning High Priest. This is already the case in 65 AD (the date the book of Hebrews was written" and it is true even while the second temple in Jerusalem was still functional with priests and animal sacrifices ( as we are reminded in the book of Hebrews). In addition - the Veil of the Jewish temple was torn from top to bottom at the crucifixion of Christ signalling the end of that temple service.

Heb 8: 1 Now the main point in what has been said is this: we have such a high priest, who has taken His seat at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens, 2 a minister in the sanctuary and in the true tabernacle (temple), which the Lord pitched, not man
How does this fit with your view? Ez 40:38 A room with a doorway was by the portico in each of the inner gateways, where the burnt offerings were washed. 39 In the portico of the gateway were two tables on each side, on which the burnt offerings, sin offerings[n] and guilt offerings were slaughtered. 40 By the outside wall of the portico of the gateway, near the steps at the entrance of the north gateway were two tables, and on the other side of the steps were two tables. 41 So there were four tables on one side of the gateway and four on the other—eight tables in all—on which the sacrifices were slaughtered. 42 There were also four tables of dressed stone for the burnt offerings, each a cubit and a half long, a cubit and a half wide and a cubit high.[o] On them were placed the utensils for slaughtering the burnt offerings and the other sacrifices. 43 And double-pronged hooks, each a handbreadth[p] long, were attached to the wall all around. The tables were for the flesh of the offerings.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,477
11,972
Georgia
✟1,107,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
How does this fit with your view?


Ez 40:38 A room with a doorway was by the portico in each of the inner gateways, where the burnt offerings were washed. 39 In the portico of the gateway were two tables on each side, on which the burnt offerings, sin offerings[n] and guilt offerings were slaughtered. 40 By the outside wall of the portico of the gateway, near the steps at the entrance of the north gateway were two tables, and on the other side of the steps were two tables. 41 So there were four tables on one side of the gateway and four on the other—eight tables in all—on which the sacrifices were slaughtered. 42 There were also four tables of dressed stone for the burnt offerings, each a cubit and a half long, a cubit and a half wide and a cubit high.[o] On them were placed the utensils for slaughtering the burnt offerings and the other sacrifices. 43 And double-pronged hooks, each a handbreadth[p] long, were attached to the wall all around. The tables were for the flesh of the offerings.
It points to a time future to the days of Ezekiel where God would still have been promoting animal sacrifices as being a type pointing forward to the time when Christ would come and die for our sins, the once for all sacrifice for sins.

Since the temple described was never built before Christ died (and ended all sacrifice and offerings,) then this text above describes one of the two future scenarios (the success path) that did not happen due to God's people rejecting his purpose for them, similarly to what we see them doing in Luke 7.

Luke 7:
30 But the Pharisees and the lawyers rejected God’s purpose for themselves, not having been baptized by John.

Notice that Heb 10 declares the end of all animal sacrifice and offerings

Heb 10:
5 Therefore, when He comes into the world, He says,

“Sacrifice and offering You have not desired,
But a body You have prepared for Me;
6 In whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You have taken no pleasure.
7 “Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come
(In the scroll of the book it is written of Me)
To do Your will, O God.’”

8 After saying above, “Sacrifices and offerings and whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You have not desired, nor have You taken pleasure in them” (which are offered according to the Law), 9 then He said, “Behold, I have come to do Your will.” He takes away the first in order to establish the second. 10 By this will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

The text clearly says all animal sacrifices and offering lose their legitimacy at the cross because they were taken over by the once for all sacrifice of Christ on the cross.

Heb 10 goes on to say this.
11 Every priest stands daily ministering and offering time after time the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins; 12 but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God, (NASB)

It says animal sacrifices were still going on in Jerusalem as of the writing of Heb 10 but they did nothing. The Heb 8 third temple , in heaven, with Christ as High Priest
 
Upvote 0

RandyPNW

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
3,710
838
Pacific NW, USA
✟172,516.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I suppose I take Ezekiel's temple as your 3rd choice, the idealized temple, that was not built and was never meant to be built. It utilized the then-current Temple structure in the Law to convey how it was supposed to operate until its purpose is complete in the nation of Israel.

We know it is a vision because we are basically told so. It was high up on a mountain, which is not where the Temple was. It illustrated a more perfect Temple worship in order to convict Israel who had not been operating in proper faith under the Temple Law. In fact, their sins had become so bad that the Temple was destroyed by the Babylonians.

We see the same kind of thing in Rev 11 where John sees the Temple being measured to illustrate how true Temple worship is being exercised in the NT era. It is purely symbolic of true NT worship.
 
Upvote 0

Mercy Shown

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2019
852
240
65
Boonsboro
✟96,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It points to a time future to the days of Ezekiel where God would still have been promoting animal sacrifices as being a type pointing forward to the time when Christ would come and die for our sins, the once for all sacrifice for sins.

Since the temple described was never built before Christ died (and ended all sacrifice and offerings,) then this text above describes one of the two future scenarios (the success path) that did not happen due to God's people rejecting his purpose for them, similarly to what we see them doing in Luke 7.

Luke 7:
30 But the Pharisees and the lawyers rejected God’s purpose for themselves, not having been baptized by John.
Are there any other prophecies you can think of that promised something conditionally, but the conditions were never mentioned? It would make this option more plausible if there are such conditional promises given without explicitly stating the condition.


Another question: do you believe in the unlimited omniscience of God or in limited omniscience? This connects to the prophecy in the sense that if God has unlimited omniscience, then He would have known that the sacrifices would end before this temple was ever built.
Notice that Heb 10 declares the end of all animal sacrifice and offerings

Heb 10:
5 Therefore, when He comes into the world, He says,

“Sacrifice and offering You have not desired,
But a body You have prepared for Me;
6 In whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You have taken no pleasure.
7 “Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come
(In the scroll of the book it is written of Me)
To do Your will, O God.’”

8 After saying above, “Sacrifices and offerings and whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You have not desired, nor have You taken pleasure in them” (which are offered according to the Law), 9 then He said, “Behold, I have come to do Your will.” He takes away the first in order to establish the second. 10 By this will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

The text clearly says all animal sacrifices and offering lose their legitimacy at the cross because they were taken over by the once for all sacrifice of Christ on the cross.

Heb 10 goes on to say this.
11 Every priest stands daily ministering and offering time after time the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins; 12 but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God, (NASB)

It says animal sacrifices were still going on in Jerusalem as of the writing of Heb 10 but they did nothing. The Heb 8 third temple , in heaven, with Christ as High Priest
This tends to lead me toward the metephore interpretation of the passage.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,477
11,972
Georgia
✟1,107,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Are there any other prophecies you can think of that promised something conditionally, but the conditions were never mentioned?

Moses clearly states the conditions in Deuteronomy 30:15-20, and in even greater detail in Deut 28:15-68
Solomon clearly states the conditions in 1 Kings 9:7
Christ confirms Solomon's curse in Matt 23:38
It would make this option more plausible if there are such conditional promises given without explicitly stating the condition.
see the above texts.
Another question: do you believe in the unlimited omniscience of God or in limited omniscience?
God knows all.

For example in Gen 2 God knew what would happen in Gen 3 but does not say to Adam in Gen 2 "you are doomed to fail" or 'you must fail"

In fact in Gen 6 God says "I REPENT that I have made mankind" even though He knew full well what would happen.
 
Upvote 0

Mercy Shown

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2019
852
240
65
Boonsboro
✟96,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Moses clearly states the conditions in Deuteronomy 30:15-20, and in even greater detail in Deut 28:15-68
Solomon clearly states the conditions in 1 Kings 9:7
Christ confirms Solomon's curse in Matt 23:38

see the above texts.

God knows all.

For example in Gen 2 God knew what would happen in Gen 3 but does not say to Adam in Gen 2 "you are doomed to fail" or 'you must fail"

In fact in Gen 6 God says "I REPENT that I have made mankind" even though He knew full well what would happen.
These texts show the condition. I was wondering about prophecies that have no conditions attached to them but they still never happened.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,866
3,094
45
San jacinto
✟214,751.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
These texts show the condition. I was wondering about prophecies that have no conditions attached to them but they still never happened.
Even when there aren't explicit conditions, there is always an implicit condition within prophecies that they are contingent upon either repentance of those who are under the threat of judgment or obedience of those who are receiving benefits. Prophecy was given, at least in large part, to warn or encourage covenental adherence. Of course, there are exceptions, but as a general rule all prophecy was contingent.
 
Upvote 0

Mercy Shown

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2019
852
240
65
Boonsboro
✟96,397.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Even when there aren't explicit conditions, there is always an implicit condition within prophecies that they are contingent upon either repentance of those who are under the threat of judgment or obedience of those who are receiving benefits. Prophecy was given, at least in large part, to warn or encourage covenental adherence. Of course, there are exceptions, but as a general rule all prophecy was contingent.
what, if any, is the difference between a prophecy and a promise?
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,866
3,094
45
San jacinto
✟214,751.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
what, if any, is the difference between a prophecy and a promise?
A prophecy is a specific statement about future events and how they will unfold, a promise is an unqualified statement of what God intends.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mercy Shown
Upvote 0