"Under Title X of the US Code, the President has plenary authority..."

[Servus]

I've been respectful.

Untrue. See below.

Your evasiveness, non-answers, and bad-faith arguments, on the other hand...

 

[7thKeeper]

Untrue. See below.

How is that disrespectful? It's an accurate description.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

Untrue. See below.

I call a spade a spade. If you find that disrespectful, then there's the ignore button. Now - back on topic?

 

[rjs330]

Clearly not the case.

I agree part 1 doesn't apply.

Also clearly not the case.

I disagree. When citizens are attacking agents attempting to stop them form doing their jobs and are attacking federal buildings where agents are located, surrounding agents and attempting to prevent them from doing their jobs thats rebellion.

Also clearly not the case - ICE is still arresting people and deporting them.

They are able to arrest people, but that doesn't mean they are able to arrest everyone they are trying to. There are areas in Chicago where people are preventing them from executing their authority. Those stories need to be told. I've seen plenty of videos from the people themselves and their testimonies of how rhey have chased ICE off and prevented them from doing their job.

There are neighborhoods where they have organized watches where when ICE is seen they blow whistles summoning crowds of people who rush the agents.

In my opinion these two things are happening.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

There are neighborhoods where they have organized watches where when ICE is seen they blow whistles summoning crowds of people who rush the agents.

That’s wonderful. I love hearing about communities coming together to protect their own.

 

[Servus]

I call a spade a spade. If you find that disrespectful, then there's the ignore button. Now - back on topic?

How is that disrespectful? It's an accurate description.

No it's ad hominem personal attacks which derail threads.

 

[rjs330]

That’s wonderful. I love hearing about communities coming together to protect their own.

Thus the need for military support. Violations of law and rebellion.

 

[7thKeeper]

No it's ad hominem personal attacks which derail threads.

Pointing out that you aren't answering the question and actively avoiding it isn't a personal attack. It's pointing out the lack of an arguement that you have.

 

[Servus]

Pointing out that you aren't answering the question and actively avoiding it isn't a personal attack.

That can be done without being rude and insulting. As a matter of fact if that hadn't happened, this derail wouldn't have occurred. I wouldn't perform the task of cutting and pasting readily available information that took a minute to find, because people were being disrespectful in their demand for such.

It's pointing out the lack of an arguement that you have.

Specify please. Based on posts I've made in this thread, what's my alleged argument?