Another look at the moon landing.

[David Lamb]

If they had been to Mars like they claim they have, I would have expected this to big news also I thought this was just a pipe dream of Elon Musk's.

Who claims they have actually been to Mars? As I understand it, although unmanned spacecraft have been to Mars, nobody has claimed that a human being has been there.

 

[Larniavc]

Who claims they have actually been to Mars?

No one does. This whole thread is just wild claim after wild claim to keep the readers engaged.

 

[d taylor]

-
​

If rockets are going up and leaving a globe earth and going 200,00 mile away. Out into an outer space as exist, as stated and described by science, with CGI illustrations

Then have at lest one actual video example of a rocket going up and showing the earth as the rocket leaves the earth in the distance. With the earth getting further and further away from the rocket, so eventually the whole globe earth is seen and eventually being reduced in size as the rocket over travel distance, gets further and further away from the globe earth.

 

[Hentenza]

-
​

If rockets are going up and leaving a globe earth and going 200,00 mile away. Out into an outer space as exist, as stated and described by science, with CGI illustrations

Then have at lest one actual video example of a rocket going up and showing the earth as the rocket leaves the earth in the distance. With the earth getting further and further away from the rocket, so eventually the whole globe earth is seen and eventually being reduced in size as the rocket over travel distance, gets further and further away from the globe earth.

Sure let’s place a camera in the rocket exhaust so it can film the earth as it leaves. What a non sense request. Like I posted earlier, here is the schedule for future space missions. One is tonight at 8pm and you can watch it.

Launches | Next Spaceflight

Catch the next launches in spaceflight or view all previous launches

nextspaceflight.com

 

[Apple Sky]

Sure let’s place a camera in the rocket exhaust so it can film the earth as it leaves.

Surly they could place a camera somewhere on the rocket ???

 

[Apple Sky]

-
​

If rockets are going up and leaving a globe earth and going 200,00 mile away. Out into an outer space as exist, as stated and described by science, with CGI illustrations

Then have at lest one actual video example of a rocket going up and showing the earth as the rocket leaves the earth in the distance. With the earth getting further and further away from the rocket, so eventually the whole globe earth is seen and eventually being reduced in size as the rocket over travel distance, gets further and further away from the globe earth.

I've yet to see a genuine image of the earth in it's full glory.

 

[David Lamb]

I've yet to see a genuine image of the earth in it's full glory.

Correction - you have yet to see an image of the earth in all its glory that you believe is genuine. A search on Google for "The earth from space" brings up hundreds of images. For example:

 

[Hentenza]

Surly they could place a camera somewhere on the rocket ???

Why? The view would be obfuscated by the exhaust plume anyway.

 

[Apple Sky]

Correction - you have yet to see an image of the earth in all its glory that you believe is genuine. A search on Google for "The earth from space" brings up hundreds of images. For example:

View attachment 371200

Pity it's a CGI ............

 

[Hentenza]

Pity it's a CGI ............

All of them?

 

[Larniavc]

Surly they could place a camera somewhere on the rocket ???

Don’t be silly. The Polaroid picture would slide out of the camera and drift off into space.

 

[Apple Sky]

All of them?

What do you mean, all of them ? There was only one.

 

[Strong in Him]

I'm sorry but at the moment we can only fly in low earth orbit.

Right.
Firstly, I said that A - meaning ONE - video is not evidence. You have not answered that but just gone ahead and posted your video.
If you are prepared to accept that the only evidence you need for something is one YouTube video, then you have a problem. because there are several videos which say, and show, that people DID go to the moon.
Secondly, you have told us several times that you don't trust NASA - the are ALL liars, they are somehow connected with a Hebrew word for "deceiver" or whatever it was. So if NASA, who are ALL liars, are saying they didn't go to the moon - they went to the moon. I mean, it couldn't be a case of you trusting NASA only when they say something that you want to hear, could it? Surely not.
Thirdly, NASA is not saying that it never went to the moon. Why would it; it was NASA that trained the astronauts, launched the rockets etc.

 

[Strong in Him]

What do you mean, all of them ? There was only one.

There have been several photographs of the earth from space/the moon.
They didn't have CGI in 1969.

 

[Apple Sky]

They didn't have CGI in 1969.

You are correct; Computer-Generated Imagery (CGI) was not invented or widely available in 1969, so it could not have been used to create footage of the first moon landing.

The supposed fake footage and photographs from the Apollo missions were supposedly captured using technology such as specialized slow-scan television (SSTV) cameras and film, which were subject to the limitations of the time.

 

[Strong in Him]

The supposed fake footage and photographs from the Apollo missions were supposedly captured using technology such as specialized slow-scan television (SSTV) cameras and film, which were subject to the limitations of the time.

And you say that my posts don't make sense!

Either you meant to say, "the fake footage ...." or "the supposed genuine footage ....".
If you say "the supposed fake footage ...." that means it is supposed to be fake, but you don't believe it is. Which, I think, is the opposite of your position.
If the footage was supposedly captured using technology such as SSTV, that means it was, but you don't believe it.

So is your position; "this footage was captured using SSTV - but this technology had limitations and was not reliable", or "this footage was supposed to have been captured using SSTV, but I don't believe that it was"?

 

[Hentenza]

What do you mean, all of them ? There was only one.

There are millions of pictures of the earth from space. Take your pick.

 

[Hentenza]

You are correct; Computer-Generated Imagery (CGI) was not invented or widely available in 1969, so it could not have been used to create footage of the first moon landing.

The supposed fake footage and photographs from the Apollo missions were supposedly captured using technology such as specialized slow-scan television (SSTV) cameras and film, which were subject to the limitations of the time.

Nope.

 

[Apple Sky]

There are millions of pictures of the earth from space. Take your pick.

 

[Strong in Him]

View attachment 371209


View attachment 371208

Don't be silly.