Christians Have No Right To Be Adultists

[Photon Guy]

Christians have no right to be adultists.

 

[Maria Billingsley]

Christians have no right to be adultists.

Elaborate?

 

[Hentenza]

What’s an adultist?

 

[Delvianna]

What is an adultist to you? Because:

"He who spares his rod hates his son,
But he who loves him disciplines him promptly." Proverbs 13:24

And

"Train up a child in the way he should go,
And when he is old he will not depart from it." - Proverbs 22:6

Which goes against the basic definition of "adultist".

 

[Gregory Thompson]

Looks like it's an "age" related "ism."

 

[Gregory Thompson]

As far as I recall, the only "right" cited in the bible is the right to be sons of God. . .

 

[Godcrazy]

OP you have to explain your thoughts.
If you mean beating your child or show control obedience stuff it is wrong. I was beaten badly and abused and worse by my parents. I know from first hand experience how damaging that is. Those who think that is okay have lost it.
It is the same thing as it say about wives to be obedient but next verse it say men love your wives and be kind and do not show bitterness roughly said. So that means, everything with love. Love does not beat.

 

[seeking.IAM]

I did not know what an adultism meant. Given the explanation offered, I'll observe that adultism is rampant in the church. An example might be churches that extend full membership to minors yet not full voice by not including their participation on church committees. Even young adults have trouble with that sometimes as some places seemingly require a certain amount of grey hair among decision influencers.

 

[Servus]

Sounds like a liberal pejorative for treating kids like kids instead to treating them like adults.

 

[stevevw]

What’s an adultist?

Its like communist or socialist. An adultist. Or adultism lol. Any restriction or exploitation of people because of their youth, as opposed to their ability, comprehension, or capacity, may be said to be adultist.

I think the poster meant Adulterous person. Someone given over to adultery.

In saying that why is adultery called adultery. The Ai overview mentions

Adultery is called adultery because the word comes from the Late Latin verb adulterare, meaning "to alter" or "to corrupt," which is a combination of ad ("towards") and alter ("other"). The name reflects the act of "making other" or corrupting the exclusive nature of the marriage bond, essentially altering the marriage by bringing in an "other" person.

To alter or corrupt the marriage bond that God made between man and women. Its interesting that it mentions corrupting the exclusive nature of the marriage bond.

Like its in our nature or in nature that marriage is between one man and one women for life. Like a committment and bondage that can never be broken.

This as opposed to the unnatural redefining of marriage as like either s business contract that can be broken or not having any natural or God give nature but as a socially constructed definition that reflects social norms. Whatever they may be. But always a human determination which is usually based on individual happiness and fullfillment as the main priority.

 

[Hentenza]

Its like communist or socialist. An adultist. Or adultism lol. Any restriction or exploitation of people because of their youth, as opposed to their ability, comprehension, or capacity, may be said to be adultist.

I think the poster meant Adulterous person. Someone given over to adultery.

In saying that why is adultery called adultery. The Ai overview mentions

Adultery is called adultery because the word comes from the Late Latin verb adulterare, meaning "to alter" or "to corrupt," which is a combination of ad ("towards") and alter ("other"). The name reflects the act of "making other" or corrupting the exclusive nature of the marriage bond, essentially altering the marriage by bringing in an "other" person.

To alter or corrupt the marriage bond that God made between man and women. Its interesting that it mentions corrupting the exclusive nature of the marriage bond.

Like its in our nature or in nature that marriage is between one man and one women for life. Like a committment and bondage that can never be broken.

This as opposed to the unnatural redefining of marriage as like either s business contract that can be broken or not having any natural or God give nature but as a socially constructed definition that reflects social norms. Whatever they may be. But always a human determination which is usually based on individual happiness and fullfillment as the main priority.

lol who knows. The OP did not return so I guess your answer is as good as any other.

 

[Gregory Thompson]

So like, what's the difference between Adultism and Adultery?

Is this just a case of teenage angst?