Sure, but then those who supported that shouldn't be eyerolling or suggesting it's "ridiculous" when conservative locales do it for one of their folk heroes.
I have never complained about what local folks do for one of their heroes. I will complain if it is a federal thing.
Some states certainly did.
There were jurisdictions that ordered the flags lowered:
Jurisdiction | Details |
---|
Oregon | Governor Kate Brown ordered all state flags lowered from 11 a.m. until sunset on June 4, 2020. (opb) |
New Mexico | Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham ordered state flags to fly half-staff through sundown on June 5, 2020, to honor George Floyd (Governor Lujan Grisham) |
North Carolina | Governor Roy Cooper ordered all North Carolina flags at state facilities to be lowered from sunrise to sunset on June 6, 2020, in honor of George Floyd, who was a native of the state. (NC DOA) |
Birmingham, Alabama (City) | Mayor Randall Woodfin ordered the city’s flag to be lowered to half-staff on May 29, 2020. (https://www.wbrc.com) |
And that is their choice for those locales. Was it ordered federally?
3 different bills were named after him
View attachment 371019
Recognition of what was a murder by a police officer, that the officer felt he was doing what he was allowed, by writing legislation is a sensible thing to do.
There are too many folks killed by police and Floyd'd death was on TV. Those on the right are free to write bills as needed.
There were cities that renamed parks and streets in his honor...
View attachment 371020
They both had very public high profile memorial services attended by high-ranking politicians.
So?? Again, that is the decision of a local community.
I thought Floyd's funeral was overdone, but it was also a civil rights issue and he represented things that were happening.
So we can't pretend if as if these 2 sets of responses to a high-profile wrongful death are lightyears apart in their intent or their response.
(to where one would be seen as completely reasonable, and the other merits an eyeroll reaction)
At best, one may be able to say the "political Pander-o-meter" from the GOP on Kirk's case was at a 9, and the Democrats on Floyd's case was at a 7.5.
The difference is that the federal government didn't vote for a day of remembrance for Floyd. They passed a bill banning chokeholds, but a bill for police reforms did not pass.
Following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, politicians across the U.S. have advanced efforts to permanently memorialize him, including through coins, statues and official holidays. Congress designated Oct. 14, 2025, as the National Day of Remembrance for Kirk — who was shot and killed in Utah on Sept. 10 — and two House Republicans introduced legislation that would create commemorative silver dollars bearing his image. Meanwhile, state lawmakers in Pennsylvania, Oklahoma and Illinois moved to establish state holidays in Kirk’s honor, while proposals in Arizona and Florida would rename highways after him. And, in Oklahoma, a bill has been put forward that would require all public universities in the state to erect a statue of Kirk. Most of these efforts, though, are opposed by a majority of Americans, according to a new YouGov poll.
I don't care about local decisions as long as they are not opposed by the majority. I do care about federal actions. And as the poll referenced above, most oppose all these actions.