- Oct 17, 2011
- 43,576
- 46,643
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There actually are some indicators that could point a little bit in that directionWho knew MAGA would be the legalization party?
There actually are some indicators that could point a little bit in that direction
![]()
Cannabis Market Explodes on Trump’s Surprise CBD Endorsement
Cannabis stocks rallied Monday after President Donald Trump said cannabidiol could “revolutionize senior healthcare” and signaled support for reclassifying marijuana.wibc.com
If it turns out, after decades and decades of pot reform discussions, that the Blue team lets the Red team beat them to legalizing weed at a federal level, that could produce some very interesting voter blocs in the coming years.
More "bro science" in line with MAHA, I am afraid. Another excuse to gut real healthcare.
The medical benefits of CBD for pain management may be real, but there's also alot of nonsense marketing marijuana as a panacea.
Possibly...
But that wasn't the tune legalization advocates were singing back in the 2000's when they were using cancer patients and chronic pain sufferers as fodder to try to get their legal weed.
And Trump's signaling that there's consideration to re-schedule at at the federal level still accomplishes a few things (if he goes through with it)
1) removes barriers to doing further actual research on it
2) eases future federal sentencing, and establishes a precedent for currently incarcerated people to petition for relief on their existing sentencing
(which are two ideas that are still popular with both 18-25 and minority demographics)
As far as "gutting real healthcare"...I'd argue that we haven't had "real" (by "real", I mean comprehensive) healthcare in quite some time.
The status quo has been very little to no focus on nutrition/prevention, and a lot of focus on developing new drugs to help compensate for poor choices.
MAHA offers a boutique, individualized, and gimmicky view of healthcare as a smokescreen from addressing more systemic problems that contribute to high healthcare costs and poor health. Cardiometabolic disease's solutions can be reduced to gimmicks like grass fed beef and substituting beef tallow for vegetable oil in junk food, measles can be handled with a little cod liver oil, etc.
On the other hand, deporting people who commit less crime, leaves a population that commits more crime, the rates of crime will go up, just based on that.Imagine that. Diverting federal resources from illegal drug investigations will naturally lead to less prosecutions. It will be interesting to see the annual data for 2025...
The reason those gimmicks exist is because there's a "nutritional guidance vacuum" of sorts with most doctors. Not because they don't know many of the answers, but probably because they're tired of fighting/arguing with their patients about it.
When there is legitimate nutrition information provided, people don't seem to like the answer.
It's not a particularly tough code to crack, but it does involve exercising some judgment and willpower. We all know that fast food, cake, soda, and sitting in front of a TV all day isn't healthy.
The...
"you can be healthier by cooking your tater tots in tallow instead of wesson oil"
is appealing the to same mindset as...
"you can lose weight with this Ozempic injection"
"you can lower your cholesterol with a statin"
etc...
That mindset being: "I want to achieve this better health outcome, but I don't want to sacrifice any of the foods I like, and I still want to be able to eat until I feel stuffed every meal"
The issue with fad diets and wellness trends (that make them look more credible than they should) are that they are less unhealthy than the "standard American diet" in most cases.
In discussing the "carnivore/keto diet" and similar ones on here before, I've used a smoking analogy to compare it to.
If someone was smoking 40 cigs per day, and cuts that back to 5 cigs per day... they're going to feel better, cough a little less, not get quite as easily winded. That fact that the feel better now compared to before doesn't mean smoking 5 cigs per day is a "health tip the medical establishment doesn't want you know"
Likewise if a person was eating pizza & fast food 5 times a week and eating a bunch of sugary snacks and sodas... if that person switched to the "Shawn Baker/Paul Saladino" diet, they probably will lose weight and feel like they have more energy. That doesn't mean eating steak, butter, and eggs at every meal is a good idea or optimal, but when looked at along side the "norm", it's probably going to feel like an improvement in comparison.
But it's the main reason....Diet alone isn't the only reason Americans are obese and have poorer health.
A) No they don't, I've provided the screenshots before of the caloric differences between USA foods and their UK counterparts, if their version of the same junk food has 40-70% fewer calories, that's a game changer.People in England eat almost as lousy diets as Americans do, but they walk several thousand steps more on average, and have proportionally lower rates of obesity.
Also, MAHA is more than diet. They promote dubious notions like cod liver oil for measles instead of vaccination, or tylenol causing autism, etc.. You have not only a lack of understanding of systems theory and high order thinking, but basic lack of critical thinking.
Blowing up the shipments on the way to the US may prove to be more effectiveImagine that. Diverting federal resources from illegal drug investigations will naturally lead to less prosecutions. It will be interesting to see the annual data for 2025...
Blowing up the shipments on the way to the US may prove to be more effective
Or legalize drug use and regulate it.Then we have to adjust as well
You want to legalize fentanyl?Or legalize drug use and regulate it.
Them that want to continue to take drugs will be taking the drugs, why make it more dangerous and illegal than it needs to be?