- Oct 17, 2009
- 43,339
- 13,712
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
And what were those "crimes"?The German citizens kept hearing about the crimes the Jews were committing.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And what were those "crimes"?The German citizens kept hearing about the crimes the Jews were committing.
I did not answer because it has a false premise --> That Hitler wasn't slandering the Jews -->That the Jews were committing crimes --> Jews were eating the cats and the dogs and the pets of the people that live there.I see that you aren't responding to my question as to whether or not they were committing the crimes that the illegals here are committing--and then being released back onto the street after being caught for.
Try answering my question rather than attempting to paint a specific narrative.
And what were those "crimes"?
Then a simple "No" answer would have sufficed. Instead, you avoided the question and attempted to change the narrative.I did not answer because it has a false premise --> That Hitler wasn't slandering the Jews -->That the Jews were committing crimes --> Jews were eating the cats and the dogs and the pets of the people that live there.
If the sentiments he expressed against illegal immigrants who come here and commit violent crimes against Americans are accurate, then why do you have a problem with it?You worry too much. All I said is Trump was expressing the same sentiments against others as Nazi's expressed against Jews, and I don't like slander.
I asked what their crimes were, not what they were accused of.[Opinions expressed are derived from historical Nazi Propaganda.]
Jews were associated with money-lenders, usury and banks, and were portrayed as the enemy of small shopkeepers, small farmers and artisans.[11] Jews were blamed for the League of Nations, for pacifism, for Marxism, for international capitalism, for homosexuality, for prostitution, and for the cultural changes of the 1920s
After six issues devoted to ethnic pride, Neues Volkfeatured an article on the types of the "Criminal Jew"; [including pickpocket, con man, drug dealer, fence and passport counterfeiter] in later issues, it urged no sympathy for victims of the Nuremberg laws, while arguing that its reader could see Jewish life going on about them, unpersecuted.
'Look, those Jews are walking around free, enjoying themselves, despite all their crimes.'
Those were the crimes the Germans were hearing about. The Jews were the enemy of our Volk.I asked what their crimes were, not what they were accused of.
I didn't want to lie and slander anyone. I don't like slander.Then a simple "No" answer would have sufficed. Instead, you avoided the question and attempted to change the narrative.
You've made a mistake here. That's your question not mine.Remember, you originally said:
If the sentiments he expressed against illegal immigrants who come here and commit violent crimes against Americans are accurate, then why do you have a problem with it?
I don't believe the premise that poisoning the blood of our country is a crime. I know it's slander.If the sentiments he expressed against illegal immigrants who come here and commit violent crimes against Americans are accurate, then why do you have a problem with it?
Donald Trump wiederholt beim TV-Duell die Falschbehauptung, eingewanderte Menschen aus Haiti würden Haustiere töten und verspeisen. Woher stammt das Gerücht?'Sie fressen die Katzen und Hunde und vergiften das Blut unseres Landes'.
I read it somewhere.
Then "slander" is more serious to you than crime is? We're talking about violent crimes here.I don't believe the premise that poisoning the blood of our country is a crime. I know it's slander.
I believe in positive prejudice until I'm convinced otherwise.Do you believe in the premise of allowing known criminals into our country and then excusing the crimes they commit?
Slander is when you say something bad about other people without any evidence. If there's evidence presented, it's not slander.Or do you think it's "slander" to label people such as MS13 gang members and those in Tren de Aragua who commit child rape, human trafficking, drug trafficking, and murders as being, well, child rapists, human traffickers, drug traffickers and murderers?
Do the court cases where the illegal was found to be guilty convince you?I believe in positive prejudice until I'm convinced otherwise.
The arrests and convictions are evidence enough, and so are the victims of the crimes that were committed.Slander is when you say something bad about other people without any evidence. If there's evidence presented, it's not slander.
What illegal?Do the court cases where the illegal was found to be guilty convince you?
So why ask if it's slander?The arrests and convictions are evidence enough, and so are the victims of the crimes that were committed.
Illegal aliens. The ones who are in the country illegally.What illegal?
I'm attempting to get you to think about why you refer to something as slander when there is clearly evidence involved.So why ask if it's slander?
I can't claim to have seen any trials, but if a person is found to have committed child rape, human trafficking, drug trafficking, and murder, I'd trust in the verdict of a jury. It makes no difference whether or not they were citizens or legal immigrants or illegal immigrants.Illegal aliens. The ones who are in the country illegally.
Really? Because I'm trying to get you to think about why "poisoning the blood of our country" is evidence of slander <=The spirit of the devil in scripture.I'm attempting to get you to think about why you refer to something as slander when there is clearly evidence involved.