- Feb 10, 2013
- 37,528
- 21,635
- 29
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Celibate
- Politics
- US-Republican
I think the point was sin is sin.You're equating being gay with being a prostitute?
Really?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I think the point was sin is sin.You're equating being gay with being a prostitute?
Really?
Yeah and I’m pointing out an obvious double standard here. The suggestion, I’m guessing, is because she is rumored to have slept around? We know this president has slept around quite a bit, cheated on all his wives, bragged about grabbing women, walked in on changing contestants in a beauty pageant, slept with porno stars but no one even suggests he’s a prostitute for it.It specifically said VP
See post #117Yeah and I’m pointing out an obvious double standard here. The suggestion, I’m guessing, is because she is rumored to have slept around? We know this president has slept around quite a bit, cheated on all his wives, bragged about grabbing women, walked in on changing contestants in a beauty pageant, slept with porno stars but no one even suggests he’s a prostitute for it.
Only a woman gets that kind of treatment.
Jumping in late in the conversation. But I don't think Kamala's VP choice really mattered. She was doomed to lose regardless.![]()
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow confronts Kamala Harris over sidelining Pete Buttigieg ‘because he was gay’
In her book, Harris admitted that Buttigieg, the former US Secretary of Transportation, was her “first choice” to join her ticket as a vice presidential candidate.nypost.com
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow confronts Kamala Harris over sidelining Pete Buttigieg ‘because he was gay’
Buttigieg “would have been an ideal partner — if I were a straight white man,” but he was “too big of a risk,” Harris continued.
Someone said picking JD Vance wouldn't have helpedJumping in late in the conversation. But I don't think Kamala's VP choice really mattered. She was doomed to loose regardless.
Still does as far as I knowDidn't Tim Walls have a wife?
Don't forget that Kamala did not pick Shapiro because he was Jewish.It occurs to me that in explaining why she didn't pick Mayor Pete and some other things that she's said Kamala seems to want credit for what she "almost did "
![]()
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow confronts Kamala Harris over sidelining Pete Buttigieg ‘because he was gay’
In her book, Harris admitted that Buttigieg, the former US Secretary of Transportation, was her “first choice” to join her ticket as a vice presidential candidate.nypost.com
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow confronts Kamala Harris over sidelining Pete Buttigieg ‘because he was gay’
Buttigieg “would have been an ideal partner — if I were a straight white man,” but he was “too big of a risk,” Harris continued.
Married to the same woman 32 years and has two children.Didn't Tim Walls have a wife?
But she almost didDon't forget that Kamala did not pick Shapiro because he was Jewish.
Lol. But she didnt because he was Jewish. So kamala would be both homophobic and antisemitic.But she almost did
Did she honestly? HahaBut she almost did
Pragmatism trumps convictionsAgreed. There's already a segment of the American populace who wouldn't have voted for her simply for being a woman or being of an ethnic minority. Adding a homosexual man as running mate would have compounded the problem.
And there is already a segment of the American populace who would have voted for her simply for being a woman or being an ethnic minority. Which is why Biden nominated her. Unqualified race pandering hireAgreed. There's already a segment of the American populace who wouldn't have voted for her simply for being a woman or being of an ethnic minority. Adding a homosexual man as running mate would have compounded the problem.
And there is already a segment of the American populace who would have voted for her simply for being a woman or being an ethnic minority. Which is why Biden nominated her. Unqualified race pandering hire
That wasn't the first time he did it either. He also pledged to nominate a black woman to the Supreme Court before making a decision.I wouldn't have assumed that was why he picked her, but for the fact that he talked openly on the campaign trail about committing to choosing a minority woman. If he had planned to choose her for those reasons, he absolutely should not have openly announced that he was looking for those qualities in a running mate ahead of time. It looks even more of a DEI selection than it already may have been to an extent.
….i thought her husband is Jewish?Lol. But she didnt because he was Jewish. So kamala would be both homophobic and antisemitic.
Doesnt matter, refusing to nominate a candidate solely because that person is Jewish is antisemitic. No different than me demonstrating racism as a black man by refusing to hire someone because he was black.….i thought her husband is Jewish?