Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Local tax officials in both states told Reuters that claiming more than one home as a primary residence isn’t generally allowed in their jurisdictions and could be punishable by fines or back taxes. After Reuters contacted tax officials in Bloomfield Township, Michigan, to inquire about the dual claims, Darrin Kraatz, director of assessing, on Thursday said the township “as of today” would revoke the exemption on the Pultes’ residence there.
What is funny is that Bill Pulte's parents had two primary residences, though not since Pulte raised this accusation.
Bill Pulte, President Donald Trump’s appointee as director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency since 2020, has accused Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook of fraud, alleging that the former Michigan State professor improperly claimed her primary residence on two properties -- one in Ann Arbor and the other in Atlanta.Based on the allegations, Trump tried to fire Cook, hoping to have her removed from the board so he could push through lower interest rates. A federal judge has ruled that her removal is illegal.Interestingly, Reuters, citing public records, reports that Pulte's father, Mark Pulte, and stepmother, Julie Pulte, have done the same thing Cook is accused of. The Pulte parents have claimed primary residences in wealthy neighborhoods in both Michigan and Florida.....
That is as it should be. . .and I suspect Pulte would agree.HIs parents may have to pay back taxes thanks to Pulte making his accusations against Cook, who clearly told bankers that the home in Florida is a vacation home.
And wavers (or pardons) for ”friends”, yes.This is exactly what authoritarian regimes do, heavy-handed policing of the law against ones political opponents.
You have to take into consideration that Trump tried to fire her before, but he was blocked because SCOTUS said, in this case, that he couldn't fire her without cause, so he had his underling find a cause. Turns out to be a bogus cause, but it's nevertheless "a" cause.So let me understand this. The Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency made what appears to be inaccurate claims regarding Cook.
And based on those claims alone, not any kind of investigation, Trump fires Cook.
The SCOTUS should have no business taking up this case or therefore lack of case. It's Roberts himself who has said the Fed Reserve has a special protection status from Trump's authoritarian firing that same Robert's court granted Trump. But then again, it's the Roberts court, so who knows.A divided federal appeals court on Monday night ruled Cook can keep her job, turning aside an appeal by the Trump administration that sought to fire her ahead of the central bank’s key meeting this week.
Trump has accused Cook of mortgage fraud — a charge she denies — and has sought her dismissal, but the three-judge panel said the president violated Cook’s rights by not giving her a chance to defend herself against the accusations.
“The government does not dispute that it failed to provide Cook even minimal process — that is, notice of the allegation against her and a meaningful opportunity to respond — before she was purportedly removed,” the majority wrote in the 2-1 ruling.
The Trump administration is expected to appeal the case to the US Supreme Court.
This is pure governmental overreach. The investigators are not supposed to start with a person and then find a crime to charge them with. Going after the president’s enemies has the appearance of corruption.Top Trump administration officials are pressuring federal prosecutors in Virginia to bring charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James for mortgage fraud, despite investigators so far failing to find sufficient evidence supporting such charges, according to sources familiar with the investigation.
I'd go so far as to say we're well past the appearance of that.This is pure governmental overreach. The investigators are not supposed to start with a person and then find a crime to charge them with. Going after the president’s enemies has the appearance of corruption.
Same guys who lied to get FISA warrants?Trump officials pressuring federal prosecutors to bring criminal charges against NY AG Letitia James: Sources
Top Trump administration officials are pressuring federal prosecutors in Virginia to bring charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James for mortgage fraud, despite investigators so far failing to find sufficient evidence supporting such charges, according to sourcesfamiliar with the investigation.
Kevin Clinesmith resigned. I doubt he has any involvement in this. Now back to the topic.Same guys who lied to get FISA warrants?