Eric Trump on Charlie Kirk’s Legacy and the Radical Left – “This Could Have Been the Greatest Mistake These People Have Ever Made” (VIDEO)

[Servus]

Sorry, not sure your reference here. In Japan? Sounds like you're referring to the US? But then again I am not sure how Japan handles secondary gun transfers.

If there's a law against it, laws get broken.

 

[Say it aint so]

If there's a law against it, laws get broken.

Doesn't help me.

 

[Servus]

Doesn't help me.

I'm saying no gun purchasing regulation is going to keep people from getting guns. Just like drug laws don't keep people from getting illegal drugs.

 

[Servus]

I already did.

Do you think it’s helpful for the president’s son to further politicize Charlie’s death and try to attach it to millions of people not involved with the crime?

Your answer:

Charlie Kirk's assassination was politically charged. Lot's of those millions publicity thanked and praised the assassin on social media. There's no escape from that for the left. No matter how much they try to gaslight and deflect.

I'll ask again, is it helpful for our country to have the president's son and, yesterday, the Vice President, further politicizing Charlies death?

If it's the truth, which is likely, the truth shouldn't be kept under a bushel, but exposed to the light.

 

[Say it aint so]

I'm saying no gun purchasing regulation is going to keep people from getting guns. Just like drug laws don't keep people from getting illegal drugs.

There are countries who are able to do just that.

 

[Servus]

There are countries who are able to do just that.

What country has been able to keep everyone from taking illegal drugs, is 100% drug free, especially one as large and diverse as the US?

 

[Say it aint so]

What country has been able to keep everyone from taking illegal drugs, is 100% drug free, especially one as large and diverse as the US?

Guns.

 

[Servus]

Guns.

What country has been able to keep everyone from having a gun, is 100% gun free, especially one as large and diverse as the US?

 

[Say it aint so]

What country has been able to keep everyone from having a gun, is 100% gun free, especially one as large and diverse as the US?

No one is saying 100% other than you. What I am saying is there are countries where they are far more successful than the wild wild west here in the states. Heck, even back then in some cities guns were down right illegal.

 

[Servus]

No one is saying 100% other than you. What I am saying is there are countries where they are far more successful than the wild wild west here in the states. Heck, even back then in some cities guns were down right illegal.

I said no gun purchasing regulation is going to keep people from getting guns.

You said There are countries who are able to do just that.

But there aren't. China has the strictest policy, that's been in effect since 1949 or earlier. But that doesn't mean it's impossible for a citizen to get a gun.

I'm actually all for certain gun ownership restrictions. But at the same time I know there are a lot of people get and own guns off the record and radar. Robinson used a standard hunting rifle, and it would be pretty hard to ban those in the US.

 

[wing2000]

If it's the truth, which is likely, the truth shouldn't be kept under a bushel, but exposed to the light.

I'll take that as a "yes" to the question asked.

 

[Say it aint so]

I said no gun purchasing regulation is going to keep people from getting guns.

You said There are countries who are able to do just that.

But there aren't. China has the strictest policy, that's been in effect since 1949 or earlier. But that doesn't mean it's impossible for a citizen to get a gun.

I'm actually all for certain gun ownership restrictions. But at the same time I know there are a lot of people get and own guns off the record and radar. Robinson used a standard hunting rifle, and it would be pretty hard to ban those in the US.

Obviously Japan, and Australia. Rather than musing "what's possible" given those countries. The results are in.

 

[Larniavc]

Balderdash. The transgenderism agenda comes from the far left.

What exactly does this imaginary agenda want do you imagine?

 

[Vambram]

Not proof. Evidence.

Fuentes and his Groypers hated Kirk and they repeatedly disrupted his events. That's evidence, too.
The extreme left hated him as well. But left-wing extremists are much less likely to shoot people they hate. None of that is overwhelming proof. But the preponderance of evidence remains.


And in the end, you have nothing but denial. In a way, that's evidence, too.

NEW: Accused Charlie Kirk Assassin Tyler Robinson Confessed to Discord Group Two Hours Before Arrest: 'It Was Me at UVU Yesterday' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old accused of assassinating conservative icon Charlie Kirk, confessed in a Discord group chat to his friends shortly before turning himself in.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Vambram]

What exactly does this imaginary agenda want do you imagine?

There's nothing imaginary about the heinous truth of the transgenderism agenda.

 

[Larniavc]

There's nothing imaginary about the heinous truth of the transgenderism agenda.

That you decline to elucidate.

 

[The Barbarian]

kids are being exposed to seeing not just other people, but there fellow classmates shot and killed.

Here's a collection of photos of school shooters:

The bad news is that the Supreme Court says that police can now racially-profile for certain law enforcement purposes.

I just wish these same people upset and angered about the shooting of Kirk were as half as upset and angered come schools shootings and the sure fire the next school shooting. But they won't. Because after all, in the words of Kirk himself a few negligible deaths of innocents are tolerable for the sake of unfettered access to guns. I would assume he or his family would have never thought he was going to be one of those negligible.

Today's winner.

 

[The Barbarian]

There's nothing imaginary about the heinous truth of the transgenderism agenda.

That you decline to elucidate.

For reasons we all understand.

 

[Pommer]

Here's a collection of photos of school shooters:
View attachment 370123
The bad news is that the Supreme Court says that police can now racially-profile for certain law enforcement purposes.


Today's winner.

Not all pictured are “school shooters”.

 

[probinson]

"I'm curious. What gun regulation do you think would have prevented the Kirk school shooting?"

Sure. Substitute any shooting you want. What regulation do you think would prevent them?

You can still own guns, you still have that right, but it's for more regimented.

That's awfully vague. "Regimented" how?