Violence is never a solution.
These are dark times in our country.
It's especially concerning given the type of free speech advocate he was.
From what I can tell, Charlie wasn't a guy who only sling controversial viewpoints in a "bubbled environment", and then sign off for the day.
He was one of the few people who give anyone who was opposed to him ample opportunity to challenge him through debate.
And while I obviously don't agree with all of his views, his approach was something that you can't say for every pundit. A lot of times, they go and get in their 30-second soundbytes and jabs on a "safe network" with no opposition and preach only to the amen corner.
I've been watching some of his clips, seems like his approach was "here's an open mic, if you disagree with me, by all means state your case"
Seems as if some hyper-partisan people see "disagrees with me + I can't beat them in a debate" as a double threat.
For all the scummy stuff that Alex Jones has done and said, I'm not aware of anyone trying anything like this with him (likely because he's easy enough to beat in the marketplace of ideas)
Possible that people see "Ideas I disagree with" + "sliver of truth in some of it, so they're convincing in some aspects" as a particularly "enraging" type of political opponent?
Political discourse (like any other game)... If someone has to "cheat" or "rig the game", that's likely emblematic of being frustrated because they can't win fair and square.