durangodawood
re Member
- Aug 28, 2007
- 27,852
- 19,515
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
Its plain as day Trump wants this whole thing to go away before any docs get released.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Maybe it's not a D or an R but someone else altogether.If so, then lets release them and see what if anything is so embarrassing to the D's.
Right?
Maybe!Maybe it's not a D or an R but someone else altogether.
You'd think this would be big news by now, if true.Look it up - it is searchable.
I'm wondering why there's such an obsession over it.Maybe!
Im just trying to understand the pushback this issue is getting.
Seriously? What country are you from? Underage sex trafficking operation involving the rich and powerful, with evidence that implicates a president?I'm wondering why there's such an obsession over it.
Those dang liberals are getting so crafty with their hoaxes!The Justice Department on Thursday scrambled to address alleged revelations about the Epstein files published by James O’Keefe—founder of the far-right Project Veritas, known for its hidden-camera stings, in which individuals are secretly filmed disclosing information about the organizations that employ them.
For those of you who didn't stop reading right there.
DOJ Responds to Secret Tape of Official Detailing Epstein Files Plan
“They’ll redact every Republican or conservative person in those files, leave all the liberal, Democratic people in those files,” the official said over lunch [with someone he allegedly met on a dating site]. He also noted that Maxwell was “transferred to a minimum-security prison too recently, which is against [Federal Bureau of Prisons] policy because she’s a convicted sex offender.” He added, “They’re offering her something to keep her mouth shut.”
Then why didn't the Biden administration do anything about it?We all know Trump was involved with Epstein
If only people shared that view with human traffickers south of the border. Especially ones that got blown up by navy warships.We all know Trump was involved with Epstein. I want the papers and names released, but I don’t think it will matter. The people always knew won’t be surprised and the ones who don’t want to believe it or have made peace with their guy being an associate of a human trafficker and a pedophile won’t care. It’ll be “it was different times” and “but look at how he’s atoned since” and “he’s still doing great work for the country” or “yeah but so-and-so and so-and-so were listed too.” The status quo is maintained, nothing changes, we all just end up looking at the people who defend it with more distrust and skepticism, and then move on with life.
I wish they had. Again, not that it will matter, but it would have been nice to have it all come out.Then why didn't the Biden administration do anything about it?
If the Biden Administration had proof that Trump was a pedophilic client of Jeffrey Epstein they would have unleashed it to the media ASAP. Because that story would have stopped Trump from obtaining his second term.I wish they had. Again, not that it will matter, but it would have been nice to have it all come out.
The implication being I don’t have an issue with human traffickers in other countries? Not sure where you got that lie from, but it certainly wasn’t me.If only people shared that view with human traffickers south of the border. Especially ones that got blown up by navy warships.
I don’t think it would have stopped it. We all know he’s on it, and those who don’t believe it would justify or excuse it once it was confirmed. The man has no ethics, a convicted felon, a multiple adulterer, somebody who patronizes sex workers (home and abroad), and was found liable for one assault already. The same people who were able to put aside their ethics to elect him in view of all that would have no problem doing the same when it comes out he was tied to Epstein and raping and trafficking girls.If the Biden Administration had proof that Trump was a pedophilic client of Jeffrey Epstein they would have unleashed it to the media ASAP. Because that story would have stopped Trump from obtaining his second term.
I think I understand now. Going after white human traffickers is protecting American integrity. But going after Hispanic human traffickers is intolerance to people south of the border. Is human trafficking part of some South American cultural identity that I am unfamiliar with and should be protected?The implication being I don’t have an issue with human traffickers in other countries? Not sure where you got that lie from, but it certainly wasn’t me.
As for the war he’s trying to start with yet another country by flouting yet more laws and oversight, I don’t support the death of democracy and American integrity, thanks.
I personally have no qualm throwing elites under the bus who frequented Epstein Island regardless of which side of the aisle they're on politically. I know I'm not alone either. Trump's support base took a hit when he became a convicted felon so it stands to reason IF he was truly guilty of pedophilia he would have NOT been granted another term.I don’t think it would have stopped it. We all know he’s on it, and those who don’t believe it would justify or excuse it once it was confirmed. The man has no ethics, a convicted felon, a multiple adulterer, somebody who patronizes sex workers (home and abroad), and was found liable for one assault already. The same people who were able to put aside their ethics to elect him in view of all that would have no problem doing the same when it comes out he was tied to Epstein and raping and trafficking girls.
More like Jeffrey Epstein was arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced, whereas the boat that was attacked by us was not in the US or US waters, did not involve a trial for the occupants, wasn’t during an active conflict, and was an act of aggression to another country.I think I understand now. Going after white human traffickers is protecting American integrity. But going after Hispanic human traffickers is intolerance to people south of the border. Is human trafficking part of some South American cultural identity that I am unfamiliar with and should be protected?
The man admitted he went into a room with underage girls to leer at them. He’s a convicted sex abuser. We all know he’s an associate of Epstein. We suspect it’s how he met his latest wife. It wouldn’t have made a difference to the election.I personally have no qualm throwing elites under the bus who frequented Epstein Island regardless of which side of the aisle they're on politically. I know I'm not alone either. Trump's support base took a hit when he became a convicted felon so it stands to reason IF he was truly guilty of pedophilia he would have NOT been granted another term.
Because they were legally legitimate military targets in international water, they neither are entitled to due process, nor deserving of due process. No different than any other enemy combatant.More like Jeffrey Epstein was arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced, whereas the boat that was attacked by us was not in the US or US waters, did not involve a trial for the occupants, wasn’t during an active conflict, and was an act of aggression to another country.
But if you want to make it about race so we can really drive home you feel a certain type of way about our neighbors to the south, fine, but unnecessary as we’ve spoken before and I know your views on the matter.
I admire your commitment to being spectacularly wrong in all scenarios where you could be found to be wrong.Because they were legally legitimate military targets in international water, they neither are entitled to due process, nor deserving of due process. No different than any other enemy combatant.