Trump calls Epstein disclosures battle ‘a Democrat hoax’

[Always in His Presence]

Well then all the more reason the release these files. Right?

Wouldn't bother me in the least - I wish they would

What did this person say yesterday?

Look it up - it is searchable.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Look it up - it is searchable.

I tried and didn't find anything.

AI Overview

no victim of Jeffrey Epstein has publicly identified Bill Clinton as an abuser

 

[Servus]

didn't promise to release them to a obsessed randos.

Whatever the excuse is, the Democrats did not want to release them. They had ample opportunity and refused.

 

[wing2000]

Whatever the excuse is, the Democrats did not want to release them. They had ample opportunity and refused.

Trump could have showed up those Democrats....but for some reason he isn't....

 

[Servus]

Trump could have showed up those Democrats....but for some reason he isn't....

Look at it this way. The Republicans were pressuring the Democrats to release the files. And the Democrats refused for 4 years.

Since then in the 8 months that Republicans have been in control, now they are the ones refusing to release the files.

Could it be the Democrats had a good reason for not releasing them, and now the Republicans have seen it too? Could it be that both parties share the same reason for not releasing the files?

 

[Servus]

Are the same Democrats who refused to release the files, the same Democrats who are now asking for the files to be released?

Something doesn't seem to add up here.

 

[CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN]

Whatever the excuse is, the Democrats did not want to release them. They had ample opportunity and refused.

Because the judge sealed them. Biden wasn't allowed to break the law and unseal them.

 

[wing2000]

Are the same Democrats who refused to release the files, the same Democrats who are now asking for the files to be released?

Something doesn't seem to add up here.

...you seem to be ignoring it wasn't the Democrat's base calling for their release.

And it isn't the Democrats, and for that matter, most Republicans, calling it a "hoax."

Trump is.

And for some reason he continues to fan the flames.

 

[Servus]

...you seem to be ignoring it wasn't the Democrat's base calling for their release.

That doesn't follow the question I asked. Read it again.

And it isn't the Democrats, and for that matter, most Republicans, calling it a "hoax."

Trump is.

And for some reason he continues to fan the flames.

 

[CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN]

Trump calls Epstein disclosures battle ‘a Democrat hoax’​

When Trump is guilty, he tries to brainwash people . Into blaming the Democrat's . If a Republican or Democrat tells the truth about Trump. Trump turns people against them. And they turn against good people.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Whatever the excuse is, the Democrats did not want to release them. They had ample opportunity and refused.

Nobody refused. I've been around this little red herring before.

It's not typical to release investigative files. Biden doesn't need a reason NOT to release the files. That's standard. He needs a reason TO release them. A few rightwing nuts clamoring for them is not a sufficient reason.

 

[durangodawood]

Whatever the excuse is, the Democrats did not want to release them. They had ample opportunity and refused.

If so, then lets release them and see what if anything is so embarrassing to the D's.

Right?

 

[Always in His Presence]

GROK CONVERSATION

No, there is no hard evidence—such as an explicit statement from Trump himself, official White House directives, or documented actions by his administration—directly confirming that Trump opposes the release of Epstein-related files

 

[essentialsaltes]

GROK CONVERSATION

No, there is no hard evidence—such as an explicit statement from Trump himself, official White House directives, or documented actions by his administration—directly confirming that Trump opposes the release of Epstein-related files

Trump: DOJ has ‘done its job’ on Epstein files​

President Trump said Friday that the Justice Department had “done its job” on the Jeffrey Epstein case and called for an end to the push from bipartisan lawmakers for more disclosures related to the convicted sex offender.

The president asserted that the DOJ “has done its job, they have given everything requested of them. It’s time to end the Democrat Epstein Hoax"

 

[Always in His Presence]

Trump: DOJ has ‘done its job’ on Epstein files​

President Trump said Friday that the Justice Department had “done its job” on the Jeffrey Epstein case and called for an end to the push from bipartisan lawmakers for more disclosures related to the convicted sex offender.

The president asserted that the DOJ “has done its job, they have given everything requested of them. It’s time to end the Democrat Epstein Hoax"

GROK CONVERSATION:

Hard evidence refers to tangible, objective, and verifiable proof that directly supports a claim or fact in an investigation, legal case, or argument. It is typically physical or concrete, leaving little room for doubt or interpretation. Examples include:

• Physical objects: DNA, fingerprints, weapons, or documents.
• Digital records: Video footage, audio recordings, or timestamped data.
• Scientific data: Test results, measurements, or forensic analysis.

Unlike circumstantial evidence, which requires inference to connect it to a conclusion, hard evidence is direct and conclusive. For instance, a video showing a person committing a crime is hard evidence, while a witness's testimony is softer, as it relies on subjective recollection.

 

[wing2000]

GROK CONVERSATION:

Hard evidence refers to tangible, objective, and verifiable proof that directly supports a claim or fact in an investigation, legal case, or argument. It is typically physical or concrete, leaving little room for doubt or interpretation. Examples include:

• Physical objects: DNA, fingerprints, weapons, or documents.
• Digital records: Video footage, audio recordings, or timestamped data.
• Scientific data: Test results, measurements, or forensic analysis.

Unlike circumstantial evidence, which requires inference to connect it to a conclusion, hard evidence is direct and conclusive. For instance, a video showing a person committing a crime is hard evidence, while a witness's testimony is softer, as it relies on subjective recollection.

....hmm. Who in this thread is claiming otherwise?

 

[essentialsaltes]

GROK CONVERSATION:

On your first turn at bat, GROK wrote

No, there is no hard evidence—such as an explicit statement from Trump himself

I provided an explicit statement from Trump himself. DOJ did its job, now it's over, let's end this.

I'm not sure why I'm supposed to provide fingerprints or DNA of Trump's statement. He posted it to TruthSocial for everyone to see.

 

[Always in His Presence]

....hmm. Who in this thread is claiming otherwise?

this poster

On your first turn at bat, GROK wrote

No, there is no hard evidence—such as an explicit statement from Trump himself

I provided an explicit statement from Trump himself. DOJ did its job, now it's over, let's end this.

I'm not sure why I'm supposed to provide fingerprints or DNA of Trump's statement. He posted it to TruthSocial for everyone to see.

 

[wing2000]

this poster

...a quote of Trump stating the DOJ did its job?

 

[Always in His Presence]

...a quote of Trump stating the DOJ did its job?

yeah, I know he thinks it equate to hard evidence that he opposes their release