Watch: CNN Cuts Tulsi Gabbard Off as She Lays Out the Inconvenient Facts of the Russia Hoax

[GoldenBoy89]

I have posted already relevant links that answer those questions.

I must have missed it.

Has Obama has been charged with treason?

 

[Hans Blaster]

Your link is another political hit piece filled with lies about the Director of National Intelligence.

Russia's Girlfriend? That Tulsi?

Russian TV calls Tulsi Gabbard ‘our girlfriend.’ Can she keep US secrets?

We've known where her loyalties lie for years.

 

[DaisyDay]

Read the article, please, and it will answer your questions.

Who put the documents in the 'burn bag'? The article said that documents were in the bags, but who put them there?

And what's a 'burn bag'? The article said, "Sources told Fox News Digital that the "burn bag" system is used to destroy documents designated as classified or higher."

What wasn't the stuff in the 'burn bags' burned? The article doesn't say.

Did Patel or Bongino have anything to do with it? The article doesn't say.

One out of four questions answered. Not great.

Your link is another political hit piece filled with lies about the Director of National Intelligence.

What in that piece do you consider to be lies and why specifically?

 

[DaisyDay]

Poor Donald J Trump answers Russiagate question with Epstein pablum:

Tl;dr: The burn bag story is a Democratic hoax and not a man named "Burnbag". No cognitive decline in evidence, not at all.

 

[iluvatar5150]

syntax is king

It is about censorship - cutting off a live broadcast so their low information listeners believer their propaganda and not hear the whole story.

Do you agree with CCN's decision to censure?

Lol, yes, it's the CNN viewers who are "low information listeners believ[ing] their propaganda" and not the folks buying into claims about a public official being censored because a news org didn't carry their entire press conference about a story that was several days old.

 

[DaisyDay]

Lol, yes, it's the CNN viewers who are "low information listeners believ[ing] their propaganda" and not the folks buying into claims about a public official being censored because a news org didn't carry their entire press conference about a story that was several days old.

And patent nonsense.

 

[iluvatar5150]

And patent nonsense.

There's that, too.

 

[Say it aint so]

syntax is king

It is about censorship - cutting off a live broadcast so their low information listeners believer their propaganda and not hear the whole story.

Do you agree with CCN's decision to censure?

It's about the same ol nonsensical claim of a Russian hoax.
All news orgs make decisions to move from one press conference or another. Like this one:

​

Fox News quickly changed segments as members of the House Intelligence Committee began tearing into Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth following the US military breach scandal, cutting away from the hearing before Democrats could call for the Trump ally's resignation.​

​

That doesn't mean censorship.

CNN cut it off and fact checked the bogus claims by noting every other bipartisanship report, special counsel report, IG report, contradicts the claims Gabbard made using the partisan, no Democrat,s GOP house report written to downplay Putin's desire to help Trump.
All news orgs should have done the same less this canard would be put to bed without threads like this.

 

[Vambram]

I must have missed it.

Has Obama has been charged with treason?

He has not yet been officially charged with treason.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Censure - to express severe disapproval of (someone or something), especially in a formal statement.

I think you meant censor but that didn’t happen either as we are all here talking about Gabbard’s accusations.

I almost forgot about the Grammar Police still being active - but you were intelligent enough to understand my point.

It did indeed happen the very moment they cut the feed.

 

[Vambram]

Who put the documents in the 'burn bag'? The article said that documents were in the bags, but who put them there?

And what's a 'burn bag'? The article said, "Sources told Fox News Digital that the "burn bag" system is used to destroy documents designated as classified or higher."

What wasn't the stuff in the 'burn bags' burned? The article doesn't say.

Did Patel or Bongino have anything to do with it? The article doesn't say.

One out of four questions answered. Not great.


What in that piece do you consider to be lies and why specifically?

The article very clearly states that the "burn bag" in a secret office was filled before Patel and Bongino were in the FBI and that it's existence was revealed by FBI Director Patel.

 

[Vambram]

It's about the same ol nonsensical claim of a Russian hoax.
All news orgs make decisions to move from one press conference or another. Like this one:

​

Fox News quickly changed segments as members of the House Intelligence Committee began tearing into Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth following the US military breach scandal, cutting away from the hearing before Democrats could call for the Trump ally's resignation.​

​

That doesn't mean censorship.

CNN cut it off and fact checked the bogus claims by noting every other bipartisanship report, special counsel report, IG report, contradicts the claims Gabbard made using the partisan, no Democrat,s GOP house report written to downplay Putin's desire to help Trump.
All news orgs should have done the same less this canard would be put to bed without threads like this.

Unlike the liberals mainstream media, we refuse to sweep the lies and scandals of the Obama administration under the rug.

 

[DaisyDay]

The article very clearly states that the "burn bag" in a secret office was filled before Patel and Bongino were in the FBI and that it's existence was revealed by FBI Director Patel.

Yeah, uh-uh "discovered".

Who put the documents in the 'burn bag'? How long were they there, since which administration? Obama has been out of office for nearly a decade now.

Why wasn't the stuff in the 'burn bags' burned?

Did Patel or Bongino have anything to do with it, before this miraculous "discovery"?

Unlike the liberals mainstream media, we refuse to sweep the lies and scandals of the Obama administration under the rug.

Lies & scandals - those are the hallmarks of both Trump's administrations, short as this one has been.

 

[iluvatar5150]

Unlike the liberals mainstream media, we refuse to sweep the lies and scandals of the Obama administration under the rug.

Well yeah, you guys are in charge of sweeping under the rug the lies and scandals of the Trump administration.

 

[DaisyDay]

Well yeah, you guys are in charge of sweeping under the rug the lies and scandals of the Trump administration.

They are emptying the vacuum bag on the rug and writing Obama's name in it. Anything to distract from the Epstein scandal.

 

[public hermit]

They are emptying the vacuum bag on the rug and writing Obama's name in it. Anything to distract from the Epstein scandal.

This is basically an Epstein-adjacent thread. If it isn't about Epstein, then it's about Epstein.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

It did indeed happen the very moment they cut the feed.

No, censored would mean her message doesn’t get out at all.

No network is required to air the administration’s communications and she was not censored just because CNN has other stories to cover throughout the day.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

He has not yet been officially charged with treason.

Then I don’t really see the need for the press to keep covering this non story. They aired her announcement. They’ll be there for any new developments.

What more do you want?

 

[GoldenBoy89]

Unlike the liberals mainstream media, we refuse to sweep the lies and scandals of the Obama administration under the rug.

Right. The point is this whole Obama story is just distracting from the much more current scandals of the Trump administration.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

This is basically an Epstein-adjacent thread. If it isn't about Epstein, then it's about Epstein.

Basically. Ever since they tried putting the kibosh on the Epstein story everything has felt like a diversion away from that whole mess.