The Art of (Epstein) Distraction

[Say it aint so]

Some of these posts are just mind boggling.

 

[Hans Blaster]

No, your acceptance of illegal wrongdoing perpetrated on citizens of the US because they have different political leanings from you is disgustjng.

Haven't seen any that needs "accepting".

All of what I said was right.

It was not even close to right.

So the FBI was sent to harass parents at a school board meeting because they, what?, threatened to vote them out of their position on the school board? That’s hilarious. Really.

Threats of violence, etc., and as I said before, many of those threats were coming from non-parents and sometimes even non-locals. What a overblown complaint about a relatively limited "event".

When the left has tried on multiple occasions to assassinate Trump because of inciting language by Biden, and shot Steve Scalise because of incitement by Bernie Sanders? You just can’t make all this up.

You are really grasping at straws. I understand that being as wrong as you are is difficult to cope with, but seriously, cut your losses while your still just behind.

There were some that did not have charges filed against them, just because you refuse to listen to the truth because you don’t want to hear what they have to say doesn’t make it so. Many who were arrested and kept in jail for years ended up being charged with misdemeanors and were refused bail

Name EVEN ONE OF THEM. I dare you. Who was kept in jail without charges? Who are these misdemeanor defendants w/o bail? Do tell. If you can't name names, then you don't know what you are talking about. (I do.)

(and compared to the many that set cities on fire during the summer of 2020, who were arrested and immediately released without bail to continue rioting (because the left supported their activity, we see, again, how the DoJ was weaponized against the right.))

Squirrel!

And nobody said it was illegal to use credit cards around the Capitol, what I said was they used credit card receipts to track down people who were there, just to arrest them for being there. And yea, that is true, too. Again, you just can’t make this up.

House GOP investigating Bank of America for ‘voluntarily’ giving FBI list of customers related to Jan 6

EXCLUSIVE: House Republicans are investigating whether Bank of America "voluntarily" turned over to the FBI a list of customers who made transactions in the days on and around the Jan.

judiciary.house.gov

You linked to Gym Jordan's committee press office, they absolutely can "just make things up".

 

[Hans Blaster]

Some of these posts are just mind boggling.

The thread wasn't an invitation to provide distractions from Trump's long friendship with Jeffery Epstein.

 

[perplexed]

Are you trying to say that these files have sat on a shelf or stuffed into a file cabinet and NO Democrat has looked at it to see if they implicated Trump?

I'm noy buying that in light of everything they have done in order to destroy him, remove him or keep him from being elected. They have have shown no such restraint. No stone unturned, except they just forgot about the Epstien files. There was really damning evidence on Trump there, but its the one thing they totally forgot about.

Its baloney and you know it. The reason I dont have names is because I wasnt involved and the fact that no one came out means one of two things. Either the Democrats are so totally incompetent not to access the one thing that could destroy Trump or they accessed it and found nothing they could really use.

Its baloney and you know it. The reason I dont have names is because I wasnt involved and the fact that no one came out means one of two things. Either the Democrats are so totally incompetent not to access the one thing that could destroy Trump or they accessed it and found nothing they could really use.

I reject this oversimplification but surely total Democrat incompetence is plausible, I double dog dare you to say otherwise.

 

[A New Dawn]

Haven't seen any that needs "accepting".

It was not even close to right.

Threats of violence, etc., and as I said before, many of those threats were coming from non-parents and sometimes even non-locals. What a overblown complaint about a relatively limited "event".

You are really grasping at straws. I understand that being as wrong as you are is difficult to cope with, but seriously, cut your losses while your still just behind.

Name EVEN ONE OF THEM. I dare you. Who was kept in jail without charges? Who are these misdemeanor defendants w/o bail? Do tell. If you can't name names, then you don't know what you are talking about. (I do.)

Squirrel!

You linked to Gym Jordan's committee press office, they absolutely can "just make things up".

Please link some of these threats from school parents. I watched dozens of videos trying to discern anything threatening in them, and it was just ‘we’ll vote you out of office’. Maybe your sources have something better. I’m willing to say I’m wrong on this issue, but even when called in to be questioned in front of Congress they came up with nothing.

Just demonstrating your two-faced-ness on the same issue with left compared to right. And that two-faced-ness is part of the problem with a weaponized DoJ.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Please link some of these threats from school parents. I watched dozens of videos trying to discern anything threatening in them, and it was just ‘we’ll vote you out of office’. Maybe your sources have something better. I’m willing to say I’m wrong on this issue, but even when called in to be questioned in front of Congress they came up with nothing.

Here is a contemporary story about the incidents

https://www.npr.org/sections/back-to-school-live-updates/2021/09/30/1041870027/school-boards-federal-help-threats-violence

I note that it doesn't have anything to do with Jeffery Epstein recruiting HS girls because he was already dead in 2021.

Just demonstrating your two-faced-ness on the same issue with left compared to right. And that two-faced-ness is part of the problem with a weaponized DoJ.

Pull back on the insults and assumptions there. Now would be a good time to stop that.

 

[perplexed]

Why did all the whistleblowers remain silent when asked to do opposition research on Trump but speak out when there was threat tag placed on people arguing with school boards?

 

[Hans Blaster]

Why did all the whistleblowers remain silent when asked to do opposition research on Trump but speak out when there was threat tag placed on people arguing with school boards?

What does this have to do with Epstein? (I'm not even sure what it is in the first place.)

 

[perplexed]

What does this have to do with Epstein? (I'm not even sure what it is in the first place.)

People keep telling me if there was incriminating evidence linking Trump and Epstein it is OBVIOUS some deep state stooge would have leaked it with 100% certainty.

 

[Hans Blaster]

People keep telling me if there was incriminating evidence linking Trump and Epstein it is OBVIOUS some deep state stooge would have leaked it with 100% certainty.

I wouldn't believe that. There is a lot of bad info on this site.

 

[rjs330]

Oh my goodness, you're so emotional! Outrage is an emotion, not logic.

You forget, logic is not the same thing as emotion. It was a logical conclusion to yout posts. Seems that you may be the one responding with emotions.

How so, as he didn't possess them?

The following article was put into the congressional record:

Yet, still no pictures. Even your article doesn't say the non-existent pictures were of topless under 18 year olds.

 

[DaisyDay]

You forget, logic is not the same thing as emotion.

Pointing out your response is based on emotion rather than logic is hardly "forgetting" that they are not the same as it is essential to the sense of the sentence that they not be. This is basic.

It was a logical conclusion to yout posts. Seems that you may be the one responding with emotions.

No, it was an emotional outburst on your part.

Yet, still no pictures.

This article has another mention of the photos.
You may note (or not, horse/water) that Wolff says the photos were kept in Epstein's safe and presumably would now be in custody of the DOJ who raided the safe. What were you expecting to see?

Even your article doesn't say the non-existent pictures were of topless under 18 year olds.

The article does not say the pictures don't exist. That is your own desperate conclusion. Can you tell what the article did say?

Wolff shared the tape with the Daily Beast ahead of discussing it on his Fire and Fury podcast on Monday. Last Thursday he caused shockwaves by revealing a few seconds of a separate recording in which Epstein spoke in detail about the inner workings of the Trump administration. Wolff also said Thursday that the pedophile showed off photos of Trump with topless young women sitting in his lap.

 

[A New Dawn]

Here is a contemporary story about the incidents

https://www.npr.org/sections/back-to-school-live-updates/2021/09/30/1041870027/school-boards-federal-help-threats-violence

Wow. That’s so scary. I’m sorry, but this is a nothing report. Just a bunch of vague hearsay, but since it matches the agenda of the left, just feel free to go in and strip those parents of their rights to make their complaints known.

Pull back on the insults and assumptions there. Nowwould be a good time to stop that.

I’m sorry, but your lack of concern that people on the right have experienced much worse than this but yet prop up hearsay and hoax reports to support violence from your side of the aisle makes me not respect your position. You support the violence against the right, as evidenced by your defense of the violence against the right, because of your supposed moral high ground, when in reality the violence demonstrates that you have no moral high ground. That is called hypocrisy, or two-faced-ness. So, I am sick of your fake moral high ground claims and you are tired of me pointing them out. I guess we are even. Because now would be a good time for you to pull back on your acceptance of violence and hateful rhetoric for the right. But I’m not holding my breath.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Wow. That’s so scary. I’m sorry, but this is a nothing report. Just a bunch of vague hearsay, but since it matches the agenda of the left, just feel free to go in and strip those parents of their rights to make their complaints known.


I’m sorry, but your lack of concern that people on the right have experienced much worse than this but yet prop up hearsay and hoax reports to support violence from your side of the aisle makes me not respect your position. You support the violence against the right, as evidenced by your defense of the violence against the right, because of your supposed moral high ground, when in reality the violence demonstrates that you have no moral high ground. That is called hypocrisy, or two-faced-ness. So, I am sick of your fake moral high ground claims and you are tired of me pointing them out. I guess we are even. Because now would be a good time for you to pull back on your acceptance of violence and hateful rhetoric for the right. But I’m not holding my breath.

I can't help you with your paranoia or your media diet. That your view of Jan 6th is so horribly wrong is a real strong sign. Either you need treatment/therapy for the paranoia, or to stop consuming RW propaganda media. Until then, your views on these things are horribly wrong.

 

[A New Dawn]

I can't help you with your paranoia or your media diet. That your view of Jan 6th is so horribly wrong is a real strong sign. Either you need treatment/therapy for the paranoia, or to stop consuming RW propaganda media. Until then, your views on these things are horribly wrong.

Right, coming from someone who won’t even look at the full evidence provided because, heaven forbid, it doesn’t support your agenda, I’ll take that summation and advice with a grain of salt. But thanks.

 

[rjs330]

Pointing out your response is based on emotion rather than logic is hardly "forgetting" that they are not the same as it is essential to the sense of the sentence that they not be. This is basic.

Your claim is utterly baseless and you know it. So does everyone else. Over and over again your posts have shown to little more than an emotional rants rather than based upon logical conclusions surrounded by facts because of your dislike or Trump. Which is an emotion. Pointing out the fact rhat my conclusion was logical based on your posts was the proper thing to do. How on earth you deemed that as emotional is quite a head scratcher.

No, it was an emotional outburst on your part.

Lol. I guess you are entitled to believe what you

You may note (or not, horse/water) that Wolff says the photos were kept in Epstein's safe and presumably would now be in custody of the DOJ who raided the safe. What were you expecting to see?

Hmm... which was under control of the Democrats for rhe last four years. STILL no photographs though.

The article does not say the pictures don't exist. That is your own desperate conclusion. Can you tell what the article did say?

Of course it didn't because thats what Wolff said. And you know what he didnt say in that article? That the photos were of under 18 year old topless girls with Trump.

You know good well what the article said. You posted it. I hope you read it. Even your second article doesn't say they were under 18 year old topless girls on his lap.

And guess what. Still no pictures. Your claim and Wolffs claim have no evidence. In fact according to that article Wolff doesn't even claim what you do.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Right, coming from someone who won’t even look at the full evidence provided because, heaven forbid, it doesn’t support your agenda, I’ll take that summation and advice with a grain of salt. But thanks.

The "evidence" you have provided for *any* of this has been a single link to a press release from a partisan congressional committee. That is it. Not one mention of the "model parties" Epstein threw with a dozen or more teen models and only a couple middle-age male guests including his friend Donald Trump.

 

[A New Dawn]

The "evidence" you have provided for *any* of this has been a single link to a press release from a partisan congressional committee. That is it. Not one mention of the "model parties" Epstein threw with a dozen or more teen models and only a couple middle-age male guests including his friend Donald Trump.

Like I said, you don’t even look at the evidence because you don’t like who it is from. No matter who it is from, it details that the DoJ demanded the credit card companies illegally turn over information on specific individuals. Jim Jordan is trying to find out why and if they complied. You learn a lot sometimes even from “partisan sources”. I find out a lot from leftist partisan sources. You should be more open. You might even learn to see people who disagree with you as people instead of deplorables, or any of the other names your leaders have called us.

And why don’t you post a year that Donald Trump went to a party with Epstein? Probably because it happened before Donald Trump unfriended Epstein when he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago. We already know that Trump was once a friend of Epstein’s, that is until Epstein revealed his true colors.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Like I said, you don’t even look at the evidence because you don’t like who it is from. No matter who it is from, it details that the DoJ demanded the credit card companies illegally turn over information on specific individuals. Jim Jordan is trying to find out why and if they complied. You learn a lot sometimes even from “partisan sources”. I find out a lot from leftist partisan sources. You should be more open. You might even learn to see people who disagree with you as people instead of deplorables, or any of the other names your leaders have called us.

Gym Jordan is doing nothing but running exactly the same kind of "distraction' mentioned in the thread title. He's got his own "looking the away" when *he* saw systematic sexual abuse.

And why don’t you post a year that Donald Trump went to a party with Epstein? Probably because it happened before Donald Trump unfriended Epstein when he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago. We already know that Trump was once a friend of Epstein’s, that is until Epstein revealed his true colors.

By beating him out for a mansion in PB?

 

[A New Dawn]

Gym Jordan is doing nothing but running exactly the same kind of "distraction' mentioned in the thread title. He's got his own "looking the away" when *he* saw systematic sexual abuse.

By beating him out for a mansion in PB?

Why didn’t you care about ANY of this during the 4 years Biden’s shadow government was in charge?

Like I said, I am sure the DoJ tried their darndest to find something (and by “something” I mean something incriminating) on Trump in the files (because we all know how much hate they all carried (and still carry) for Trump) and came up with nothing.