• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Art of (Epstein) Distraction

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hans Blaster

On August Recess
Mar 11, 2017
21,742
16,397
55
USA
✟412,702.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
That would most likely be Merrick Garland, most likely early on in the Biden administration, when they weaponized the DoJ.
You think the AG looked through 100,000 pages of documents, plus the apparent pile of CSAM early in his appointment when there was a 2-month old mega-investigation into the biggest insurrection in 140 years? This is not credible.
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
70,871
7,883
Western New York
✟148,746.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You think the AG looked through 100,000 pages of documents, plus the apparent pile of CSAM early in his appointment when there was a 2-month old mega-investigation into the biggest insurrection in 140 years? This is not credible.
Firstly, he would have assigned it to someone, but the order would have still come from him.

Secondly, there was no insurrection. There was a lot of people protesting the election (within their rights), there were DC cops shooting rubber bullets into the crowd from above on scaffolding causing mass panic from trying to escape being shot, there were people being given a tour of the Capitol, and there were a couple people who got into scuffles with the cops. Let’s not forget that the only people shot/killed was a female Trump supporter killed by a Capitol cop and a female Trump supporter trampled to death when the DC cop shot into the crowd. Both unarmed.

Let’s also not forget that in the weaponizing of the DoJ that hundreds of people were thrown in jail for years with no due process, some the the left in so worried about with the criminal illegal aliens.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

On August Recess
Mar 11, 2017
21,742
16,397
55
USA
✟412,702.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Firstly, he would have assigned it to someone, but the order would have still come from him.
You keep speculating instead of providing information.
Secondly, there was no insurrection.
O great, your one of *those* people. SMH.
There was a lot of people protesting the election (within their rights), there were DC cops shooting rubber bullets into the crowd from above on scaffolding causing mass panic from trying to escape being shot, there were people being given a tour of the Capitol, and there were a couple people who got into scuffles with the cops.
The Capitol was closed due to COVID. There were no tours that day (or month). The rioting happened *before* the rubber bullets and tear gas. The leading edge was being controlled by the "Proud Boys". It wasn't a "couple people" in scuffles with cops, it was a couple *HUNDRED* and many of them were using weapons that they brought with them.
Let’s not forget that the only people shot/killed was a female Trump supporter killed by a Capitol cop
As she was about to leap through a broken window into the hall behind the House chamber that had Representatives exiting to safety through it.
and a female Trump supporter trampled to death when the DC cop shot into the crowd.
No cop "shot into the crowd". (A rioter did fire a gun into the air from a scaffold, but it is unlikely anyone noticed at the moment.) The rioters that stepped on and fell on the poor woman were engaged in fighting cops, not running from them. (And her death does not seem to be related to the rioter(s) on top of her, but were tied to her medication.)
Both unarmed.
The maniac that was shot was armed with a knife, but the cops weren't aware of it.
Let’s also not forget that in the weaponizing of the DoJ that hundreds of people were thrown in jail for years with no due process, some the the left in so worried about with the criminal illegal aliens.
They had tons of due process. All had bail hearings within a day or two of arrest. All had lawyers and court hearings. At no point did the number of Jan 6th prisoners under detention pre-trial reach 100 reaching a maximum during the first couple months. Those under pre-trial detention that spend the longest time in that state were because *THEY* kept delaying their own trials.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: A2SG
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,613
15,055
PNW
✟965,331.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You think the AG looked through 100,000 pages of documents, plus the apparent pile of CSAM early in his appointment when there was a 2-month old mega-investigation into the biggest insurrection in 140 years? This is not credible.
What 1885 insurrection are you referring to? The Tacoma Riot?
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,613
15,055
PNW
✟965,331.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
So the some members of the Biden administration are lizard people with special document reading powers ?
Why would it require "lizard people" to do a keyword search for "Trump" and whatever else someone might be searching for?
 
  • Like
Reactions: A New Dawn
Upvote 0

perplexed

Senior Member
Jun 22, 2005
2,451
709
52
✟160,418.00
Faith
Seeker
Why would it require "lizard people" to do a keyword search for "Trump" and whatever else someone might be searching for?
What would you do if you were working at the department of Justice investigating Epstein and got an email from Merrick Garland to search for anything that would make Trump look bad?
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,613
15,055
PNW
✟965,331.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
What would you do if you were working at the department of Justice investigating Epstein and got an email from Merrick Garland to search for anything that would make Trump look bad?
I'm just saying it would be easy for an investigator using a computer to look for and find particular information in a file.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A New Dawn
Upvote 0

perplexed

Senior Member
Jun 22, 2005
2,451
709
52
✟160,418.00
Faith
Seeker
I'm just saying it would be easy for an investigator using a computer to look for and find particular information in a file.
Exactly why are sure such a thing happened.? I would blow the whistle if asked to do something so blatantly corrupt and so would you . Sure some people unfairly prosecuted Trump but just that means it could have happened it does not mean it certainly happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
70,871
7,883
Western New York
✟148,746.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So the some members of the Biden administration are lizard people with special document reading powers ?
Your words, not mine.
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
70,871
7,883
Western New York
✟148,746.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What would you do if you were working at the department of Justice investigating Epstein and got an email from Merrick Garland to search for anything that would make Trump look bad?
As part of the swamp, I’d do it.
If I wasn’t part of the swamp, I’d still do it and then become a whistleblower.
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,959
2,045
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟556,062.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Like I said we all.know. And we all know if there was anything there that incriminated him or linked him to underage sex it would have been front page news.
A long time ago.
 
Upvote 0

ozso

Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
27,613
15,055
PNW
✟965,331.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Exactly why are sure such a thing happened.? I would blow the whistle if asked to do something so blatantly corrupt and so would you . Sure some people unfairly prosecuted Trump but just that means it could have happened it does not mean it certainly happened.
I'm just addressing the idea that it would take "lizard people with special document reading powers" to extract specific information out of a large file, when all one would need to do is click Ctrl+F.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
41,736
19,793
Finger Lakes
✟306,556.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Pardon me, I was just pointing out a logical conclusion to your posts, including your statements regarding the non-existant pictures.
Oh my goodness, you're so emotional! Outrage is an emotion, not logic.

Interesting that he didnt produce them either.
How so, as he didn't possess them?

The following article was put into the congressional record: https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08/20250227/117951/HHRG-119-JU08-20250227-SD006-U6.pdf
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
70,871
7,883
Western New York
✟148,746.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Exactly why are sure such a thing happened.? I would blow the whistle if asked to do something so blatantly corrupt and so would you . Sure some people unfairly prosecuted Trump but just that means it could have happened it does not mean it certainly happened.
Why did Merrick Garland send a fully armed and outfitted FBI SWAT team to the house of pro-life activist Houk, in the early hours when everyone was at home, after he said he would surrender himself without giving him the chance to do that?

Why did Merrick Garland send agents to investigate parents asking questions at a school board meeting and accusing them of being terrorists?

Why did Merrick Garland jail hundreds of Jan. 6ers without even filing charges for YEARS, merely for walking through the building? Some didn’t even enter and were jailed just for Boeing there. He told the credit card companies to look through their transactions to see who was in the area and give them the names so they could arrest them. Just for being in the area.

It’s things like this, harassing people who dare to speak out against the leftist agenda, which is their right, and treating them as criminals (or worse), or invading someone’s home, who has the right to turn himself in and depriving people of their rights of due process, ignoring the US stance on justice of innocent till proven guilty. THIS is what we call weaponizing the DoJ. Especially when it is done only to persons on the opposing political side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johansen
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

On August Recess
Mar 11, 2017
21,742
16,397
55
USA
✟412,702.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Why did Merrick Garland send a fully armed and outfitted FBI SWAT team to the house of pro-life activist Houk, in the early hours when everyone was at home, after he said he would surrender himself without giving him the chance to do that?
That sounds like the decision of an FBI official, not the AG. Perhaps the FBI director or deputy, but probably the SAIC of the local field office. (Was he known to be armed?) I suspect this also happened right after agents were killed in a raid during a Florida CSAM case (I think that case was in 2021.) so they might have been a bit more cautious or overzealous.
Why did Merrick Garland send agents to investigate parents asking questions at a school board meeting and accusing them of being terrorists?
Because they were making threats against public officials (school board members). (Again this is probably within FBI and not at the top.) Some of these "threateners" that get wrapped up in the RW complaint weren't actually parents or in the communities, but roving bands of PBs and their ilk who went from school to school getting shouty school board meetings because the school had the temerity to treat LGBT children as humans.
Why did Merrick Garland jail hundreds of Jan. 6ers without even filing charges for YEARS, merely for walking through the building?
I already told you that the "jail for years w/o charges" was a lie someone told you. Everyone was charged *before* they were arrested. You should stop repeating it. Now I will add that misdemeanor trespass (the walking through the building crime you mention) didn't get anyone more than a few months sentence (after conviction), and I am aware of anyone in that category (out of about 1000) who was even detained for more than a couple days after arrest.

You have been fed some very nonsense falsehoods about Jan 6th and the prosecution of the crowd. You should treat your sources as if they are lying to you, because they are.
Some didn’t even enter and were jailed just for Boeing there.
Who?
He told the credit card companies to look through their transactions to see who was in the area and give them the names so they could arrest them. Just for being in the area.
Using a credit card near the Capitol was not a crime and no one was charged for it. There was no place to use the cards on the grounds since everything was closed. Hotels and CC companies, etc., were given data retention orders, but the FBI was not just given a list of credit cards used near the Capitol to comb through. What they did get, through a warrant, was the list of all cell phones that were geolocated inside the closed Capitol grounds. These were used in many charging documents, but only with additional photographic evidence of the suspect inside the Capitol.
It’s things like this, harassing people who dare to speak out against the leftist agenda, which is their right, and treating them as criminals (or worse), or invading someone’s home, who has the right to turn himself in and depriving people of their rights of due process, ignoring the US stance on justice of innocent till proven guilty.
Here's the thing, even if everything you said was completely right (and basically none of it is, but let's put that aside), it would not justify the violation of anyone else's civil rights, including due process.
THIS is what we call weaponizing the DoJ. Especially when it is done only to persons on the opposing political side.
Your narrative is completely false.
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

Bind my wandering heart to thee!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2004
70,871
7,883
Western New York
✟148,746.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That sounds like the decision of an FBI official, not the AG. Perhaps the FBI director or deputy, but probably the SAIC of the local field office. (Was he known to be armed?) I suspect this also happened right after agents were killed in a raid during a Florida CSAM case (I think that case was in 2021.) so they might have been a bit more cautious or overzealous.

Because they were making threats against public officials (school board members). (Again this is probably within FBI and not at the top.) Some of these "threateners" that get wrapped up in the RW complaint weren't actually parents or in the communities, but roving bands of PBs and their ilk who went from school to school getting shouty school board meetings because the school had the temerity to treat LGBT children as humans.

I already told you that the "jail for years w/o charges" was a lie someone told you. Everyone was charged *before* they were arrested. You should stop repeating it. Now I will add that misdemeanor trespass (the walking through the building crime you mention) didn't get anyone more than a few months sentence (after conviction), and I am aware of anyone in that category (out of about 1000) who was even detained for more than a couple days after arrest.

You have been fed some very nonsense falsehoods about Jan 6th and the prosecution of the crowd. You should treat your sources as if they are lying to you, because they are.

Who?

Using a credit card near the Capitol was not a crime and no one was charged for it. There was no place to use the cards on the grounds since everything was closed. Hotels and CC companies, etc., were given data retention orders, but the FBI was not just given a list of credit cards used near the Capitol to comb through. What they did get, through a warrant, was the list of all cell phones that were geolocated inside the closed Capitol grounds. These were used in many charging documents, but only with additional photographic evidence of the suspect inside the Capitol.

Here's the thing, even if everything you said was completely right (and basically none of it is, but let's put that aside), it would not justify the violation of anyone else's civil rights, including due process.

Your narrative is completely false.
No, your acceptance of illegal wrongdoing perpetrated on citizens of the US because they have different political leanings from you is disgustjng. All of what I said was right. So the FBI was sent to harass parents at a school board meeting because they, what?, threatened to vote them out of their position on the school board? That’s hilarious. Really. When the left has tried on multiple occasions to assassinate Trump because of inciting language by Biden, and shot Steve Scalise because of incitement by Bernie Sanders? You just can’t make all this up.

There were some that did not have charges filed against them, just because you refuse to listen to the truth because you don’t want to hear what they have to say doesn’t make it so. Many who were arrested and kept in jail for years ended up being charged with misdemeanors and were refused bail (and compared to the many that set cities on fire during the summer of 2020, who were arrested and immediately released without bail to continue rioting (because the left supported their activity, we see, again, how the DoJ was weaponized against the right.))

And nobody said it was illegal to use credit cards around the Capitol, what I said was they used credit card receipts to track down people who were there, just to arrest them for being there. And yea, that is true, too. Again, you just can’t make this up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johansen
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
28,190
9,074
65
✟430,816.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Which particular democrat politician or member of the democrat media looked through all the governments material on Epstein looking for dirt on Trump? when did they did do it ?
Are you trying to say that these files have sat on a shelf or stuffed into a file cabinet and NO Democrat has looked at it to see if they implicated Trump?

I'm noy buying that in light of everything they have done in order to destroy him, remove him or keep him from being elected. They have have shown no such restraint. No stone unturned, except they just forgot about the Epstien files. There was really damning evidence on Trump there, but its the one thing they totally forgot about.

Its baloney and you know it. The reason I dont have names is because I wasnt involved and the fact that no one came out means one of two things. Either the Democrats are so totally incompetent not to access the one thing that could destroy Trump or they accessed it and found nothing they could really use.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: A New Dawn
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.