Director of National Intelligence Gabbard calls for prosecution of Obama

[NxNW]

Your link to the "20 others" is broken.

Whoops, fixed.

Regarding Flynn, what he admitted to was lying about his contacts. His supposed "collusion" had nothing to do with the election. He was, essentially, conducting diplomacy between Russia and the incoming Trump administration that had different opinions on sanctions.

Sounds like you're nitpicking the timing of the collusion while admitting it happened.

 

[BCP1928]

I wonder if the administration will have the guts to bring him to trial. If I were Obama I would demand it.

 

[NxNW]

Bottom line is neither Trump nor any if his people were convicted of it.

Over 20 of Trump's criminal operatives were convicted of it, or crimes related to it. Trump Jr attempted it, but was too stupid. I guess that's a defense.

And Obama knew there wasn't anything there, but he told his agencies to alter their assessments

Never happened.

and keep pushing the narrative. Now we find out the Russia thing was a hoax perpetrated by the Obama administration itself.

It's not a hoax when they got 20+ convictions, all admitted to.

 

[ozso]

By "tactics", you mean prosecuting criminal acts?

I mean lawfare.

 

[NxNW]

I wonder if the administration will have the guts to bring him to trial. If I were Obama I would demand it.

He should invoke his right to a speedy trial, too, so the world can see how pathetic Trump's accusations are.

 

[DaisyDay]

What would Saul Alinsky do?

More like, what would Roy Cohn do?

 

[iluvatar5150]

Sounds like you're nitpicking the timing of the collusion while admitting it happened.

No, I’m also addressing the substance of your accusation.

 

[rjs330]

Over 20 of Trump's criminal operatives were convicted of it, or crimes related to it. Trump Jr attempted it, but was too stupid. I guess that's a defense.

Never happened.

It's not a hoax when they got 20+ convictions, all admitted to.

Your link doesn't list the 20 people not eaht they were convicted of. So I dismiss the claim. Its a false claim. Just like Obamas.

Never happened.

Yes it did.

It's not a hoax when they got 20+ convictions, all admitted to.

All a hoax. There were no convictions of working with Russia to affect the election. A hoax. I dismiss your false claims.

 

[rjs330]

While this is a bombshell, I honestly expect nothing will come of it. Ive learned not to have any expectations of these things.

 

[chevyontheriver]

More like, what would Roy Cohn do?

Very Alinskyite of you to say so.

 

[NxNW]

No, I’m also addressing the substance of your accusation.

I appreciate your confirming the fact that 20+ Trump criminal operatives were convicted.

 

[wing2000]

This is the first time that Obama has been directly implicated. I think they should more forward with trials. As to Obama, presidential immunity may come into play.

....say, did you ask yourself why this Obama "finding" wasn't raised from 2016-2020?

 

[wing2000]

I mean lawfare.

What is lawfare?

 

[ozso]

What is lawfare?

✦ AI Overview ​

In politics, lawfare refers to the strategic use of legal systems and processes to undermine, attack, or delegitimize a political opponent or their policies. It involves employing lawsuits, investigations, or other legal actions not primarily to achieve justice, but rather to achieve political goals, such as hindering an adversary's ability to govern, damaging their reputation, or creating political instability.

 

[Hans Blaster]

What is lawfare?

A really solid news and analysis site:

https://www.lawfaremedia.org

 

[DaisyDay]

Very Alinskyite of you to say so.

Sure, Roy.

 

[Akita Suggagaki]

It really pains me that we have such a lack of character and leadership now so high in administration.

 

[wing2000]

Former President Obama responds via his spokesman:

“Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,” Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesman for Mr. Obama, said in a statement in response to Mr. Trump’s claims. “But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one.

Mr. Rodenbush continued: “These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/22/us/politics/obama-trump-russia-response.html

 

[Valletta]

....say, did you ask yourself why this Obama "finding" wasn't raised from 2016-2020?

We can't have individuals within the government putting out false information in order to try and con the American people into supporting their candidates. Call it treason, call it whatever. I don't know if the have enough to convict Obama or not before a jury of his peers, but they have enough on others.

 

[DaisyDay]

We can't have individuals within the government putting out false information in order to try and con the American people into supporting their candidates. Call it treason, call it whatever. I don't know if the have enough to convict Obama or not before a jury of his peers, but they have enough on others.

No, they don’t. This is purely to distract from the Epstein fiasco.