Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How would he know that Noem would respond to a question with violence?
She could have restrained them with a word. She didn't. Because she tends to respond to frustration with violence.
Oh good grief. He had a meeting a few doors down and dropped in on the Noem presser while waiting for his other meeting. Then Noem said they were there to "liberate" California, which is straight-up authoritarian.
lol typical left unfounded accusations. No one there committed violence. The security detail responded appropriately to what they saw as a treat. The senator continued to resist even as he was being removed from the room.
It appears to me you are the one in denial. Anyone who barged in the room in an aggressive manner like the senator would receive the same treatment. It was their job to keep order in that press conference. I amazed that so many liberals cannot see what is right in front of them. The senator was out of line and got what he wanted , a video taken by his staff showing him on the ground being cuffed. Hey it worked on you!
The nature of the security team's response is actually beside the point when you consider two salient facts:
Nope, she just let them do their job. And they did it professionally and quickly. Exactly as they should have.
He dropped in looking for an opportunity to be disruptive and gain some press, standing up for California's against the big mean machine. He got his moment of fame.
Their job is to assault someone asking questions at a press conference? You sure about that?
In the minds of MAGA, asking the wrong questions is "disruptive." Mussolini said so.
Maybe, and maybe not. One thing we can be sure of is that he had the authority to be there, and besides the "threat" he supposedly represented she had no authority to remove him.
Yes but he could be there but being there doesn't give him a RIGHT to disrupt the press briefing and act the way he did. I dont know that Noem was paying him any attention. She barely looked up when he started being loud and disruptive. She just let the team do their thing, as she should have. That was neither the time nor place to get into some sort of argument over what was going on. It wasnt a congressional meeting or committe meeting. I guess we are just going in circles now.
She did not give the security detail permission to remove him. The security detail removed him because they believed that he posed a threat. The security detail never asked Noem if she wanted him removed.
